Just Human Profile picture
Sep 19, 2023 14 tweets 8 min read Read on X
Trump v. Clinton and her Cohorts
Civil RICO case.
District Court, S.D. Florida

March 4th, 2022
Trump files a Civil RICO case against Hillary Clinton and her Cohorts.
It is assigned to Judge Middlebrooks.
courtlistener.com/docket/6318430…
Image
April 4th, 2022
Trump team files a motion to disqualify Judge Middlebrooks.
storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco…
Image
April 6, 2022
The motion to disqualify is DENIED.
storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco…
Image
September 8th of 2022
Judge Middlebrooks granted motions to dismiss from the defendants.
storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco…
Image
October 11, 2022
Trump team appealed the dismissals to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit.
courtlistener.com/docket/6669588…
Image
November 10th, 2022
Judge Middlebrooks began granting motions for sanctions against Trump.


storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco…
storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco…

Image
Image
February 3, 2023
Trump team filed an unopposed motion asking for a STAY pending appeal at the 11th Circuit.
storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco…
Image
June 9th, 2023
Trump team files their opening brief with the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals
storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco…
Image
And also files a motion asking the Court to take Judicial Notice of "The Durham Report."
storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco…

Image
Image
July 13, 2023
The motions were GRANTED.
storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco…
Image
July 27, 2023
Back in the District Court for S.D. Florida, Trump filed for an Indicative Ruling Based on New Evidence.
That "New Evidence" was The Durham Report.
storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco…

Image
Image
August 14th, 2023
Trump team files another Motion to Disqualify Judge Middlebrooks.
storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco…
Image
September 15th, 2023
Judge Middlebrooks DENIES the Motion to Disqualify
storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco…
Image
September 15th, 2023
In the Court of Appeals, 11th Circuit

"Appellants plan to promptly file a notice of appeal for both of these denial orders. Further, Appellants plan to move to consolidate that appeal with this current consolidated appeal."

storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco…

Image
Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Just Human

Just Human Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @realjusthuman

Sep 12
I wonder if the shooter injured himself dropping from the building like that?
I just finished reviewing updates from today. Good stuff.

Leaving a palm print is great and maybe they got DNA (huge!).

Hitting the grass hard left an identifiable shoe print (Converse), nice!

And we learned earlier they know both the route the shooter took through the neighborhood and back. THAT can lead to finding the transportation the shooter used. From there they can track via traffic cams, plate readers, and of course cameras on homes and businesses.

And they have the weapon used. DNA can be lifted from that plus finger prints, palm prints, arm prints, track purchases of the gun, scope, ammo, etc.

This is not a pro shooter or “hit” as some knuckleheads and disinfo clowns are spreading. This guy left the same way he came in, left foot prints, hand prints, the weapon, his DNA, his face on multiple cameras, etc.

Pros do not leave these behind.

Ignore the disinformation, the dumbasses, and black pillers.

Focus on the positives and on being the light and good in the world.

Pray for the Kirks, Law Enforcement, and our Nation.
BTW: I don't fault anyone for initially wondering if a professional was behind the rifle; that's fair enough. Just like people wondered if it was a trans activist. There was no evidence either way initially.

But the clues that it wasn't a pro have been present since the moment it happened.

You could tell by the sound, number one.

A pro would have used a suppressor.

Second, a pro would NOT have been that close, and the sound bouncing around the buildings gave away that the shooter was very close.

There are many accounts, usual suspects I'd say, who immediately jumped to narratives of it being a professional, it being a false flag, etc etc.

This is all so they can get clicks and views and build a bridge from the event to a conspiracy that blames the Jews or blames the CIA or whatever bogeyman they happen to prefer. The same thing happens every time (Baltimore Bridge, Butler PA, Rudy car accident, etc).

THOSE are the disinfo clowns and knuckleheads I am referring to.
Read 4 tweets
Aug 25
🪤 Image
This is frivolous, unconstitutional, and dumb, but it will get a lot of America haters to act out publicly, and the Dems will encourage/support them.

I think that's the point of doing it.

whitehouse.gov/presidential-a…
Also, if you want to penalize people burning flags, any flag, just enforce laws and ordinances already on the books against burning anything on public property without a permit.
Read 5 tweets
Aug 22
Flashback: November 2020

NSA General Counsel Michael Ellis reviews Bolton’s memoir and determines it contained classified material.

The New York Times
web.archive.org/web/2020111123…

h/t/ @nimkef x.com/realjusthuman/…Image
Read 13 tweets
Aug 21
"19 CF bank accounts obtained by LAFO during a separate Campaign Finance Fraud Investigation."
Read 8 tweets
Aug 20
🧵Update on DOJ's efforts to unseal Epstein and Maxwell grand jury material:

Judge Berman has DENIED DOJ's motion to unseal the grand jury materials in the Epstein case. Image
The reasons for the denial are the same as in Maxwell—no exceptions to Rule 6e and not a "special circumstance" case.

A judge CANNOT unseal grand jury materials UNLESS an exception under Rule 6e is met OR the case can be qualified as a "special circumstance" case. Image
In my thread on the denial to unseal grand jury materials in Maxwell I broke down the reasons for that denial and they are largely the same in this case.

Read 37 tweets
Aug 15
According to an HPSCI whistleblower 302, and my own sleuthing, the "system" for leaking classified information to media was "established" by Minority Staff Director Michael Bahar.

**That's if I am correct on what's under the redaction block.** Image
Still not sure who the network admin that set up the stand alone computer in HPSCI offices is.
Tribute to Michael Bahar Image
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(