Share this page!

Enter URL or ID to Unroll

You can paste full URL like: https://x.com/threadreaderapp/status/1644127596119195649
or just the ID like: 1644127596119195649

How to get URL link on X (Twitter) App

  1. On the Twitter thread, click on or icon on the bottom
  2. Click again on or Share Via icon
  3. Click on Copy Link to Tweet
  4. Paste it above and click "Unroll Thread"!
  5. More info at Twitter Help
Josh Guetzkow Profile picture
@joshg99
Sep 22 • 7 tweets • 3 min read Twitter logo Read on Twitter
Scrolly
Remember how the COVID vaccines contaminated with endotoxin & plasmid DNA that Pfizer/BioNTech sold to the world were only tested on 252 people, but they said they'd compare them w/the ~20K subjects who got higher quality ones?

New FOIA proves they never did that!
But I did.🧵 Image
The adverse event rate among the subjects who got the new 'Process 2' doses was 2.5x higher than the AE rate of all other treatment subjects in the same age group & 2x higher than other treatment subjects at the same sites -- controlling for sex, obesity and comorbidities.
Image
Image
Only 4 of the process 2 subjects were tested for neutralizing antibody titers (aka immunogenicity) -- all of them aged 22 and younger.

Only 3 out of the 4 showed presence of antibody titers 1 month after second jab.

None were tested for neutralizing titers before vaccination. Image
What was the excuse Pfizer/BioNTech gave in Sep. 2022 for shirking their responsibility to do the comparison study by Feb 2021 as stated in their protocol?

No need due to the "extensive usage of vaccines manufactured via 'Process 2'" as of Sept 2022.

Make it make sense!
For background and more information on the Pfizer/BioNTech bait-and-switch scandal, see this thread. 👇
x.com/joshg99/status…
The FOIA was obtained by Perseus Group member @NickHunt5, who also writes for the Daily Sceptic. Here is the cover page of the MHRA response to his request (FOI# 23/510): Image
An easy way to remember the key difference between process 1 and 2: Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
　

Keep Current with Josh Guetzkow

Josh Guetzkow Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @joshg99

Josh Guetzkow Profile picture
Jun 29
WHO to declare Aspartame a possible carcinogen?

"The enemy is not Aspartame. Our foe are nations who have failed us."

Those are the words of Prof. Woodrow Monte who has been trying to raise the alarm about Aspartame for 30 years - almost since is FDA approval in 1981.

Why?🧵
Aspartame is made from methanol, a form of alcohol that can cause severe toxic syndrome in humans (but not in lab animals) at low doses due to human genetic mutations.

Methanol itself is metabolized into formaldehyde, which is also toxic.

And cancer isn't the only problem!
Prof. Monte has linked Aspartame to many other health issues, including diabetes (which in turn increases risk of Alzheimers and Autism), multiple sclerosis, birth defects & breast cancer.

You can read more about his work at his aptly named website: whilesciencesleeps.com
Read 17 tweets
Josh Guetzkow Profile picture
May 27
Series of illuminating talks (if I do say so myself) from last week's conference on Propaganda and Mental Health. Here is mine on Censorship & Suppression of COVID-19 Heterodoxy.

See 🧵for other talks on censorship, propaganda, the WHO & mass formation.
odysee.com/@MartaGB:2/Jos…
@NAffects, who has been working with @mtaibbi and Racket News, gives the lowdown on the #TwitterFiles and their discovery of a massive and growing anti-disinformation industry consisting of NGO, government, academic and military players.

odysee.com/@MartaGB:2/And…
@PiersRobinson1 Gives a concise but sweeping overview of propaganda (aka Public Relations) -- what it is and how it works.
odysee.com/@MartaGB:2/Pie…
Read 11 tweets
Josh Guetzkow Profile picture
May 16
Was the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine clinical trial a bait-and-switch?

There were >44,000 people in the trial, but only ~250 of them were given doses made with a new manufacturing method ('process 2') that was used to make enough doses to sell around the world. From the trial protocol: https://www.nejm.org/doi/suppl/10.1056/NEJMoa2034577/suppl_file/nejmoa2034577_protocol.pdf
To our knowledge, the safety and efficacy comparison they planned to do with those 250 subjects has never been published and has not been released in the FOIA'd documents that Pfizer submitted to the FDA. Was the comparison ever done? Where are the results?
@RetsefL and I explore the importance of this comparison and the potential impact of variability in the the production process of COVID-19 mRNA vaccines on efficacy and safety in a newly published rapid response in the @bmj_latest.
bmj.com/content/378/bm…
Read 19 tweets
Josh Guetzkow Profile picture
May 16
This is too crazy.

Today in the waiting room at a clinic of Israel's largest HMO, I see out of the corner of my eye I see "Pfizer" written on one of the screens they have dotting the walls. What's this all about? 🧵

(See alt text for translation.) Reads "Public Service....
Had to wait for the selfless and generous "public service announcement" paid for by Pfizer to play again.

It starts out with this startling warning: "Atrial fibrillation increases the risk of stroke by 5 times." Image
"Do you have high blood pressure? With atrial fibrillation?" Image
Read 8 tweets
Josh Guetzkow Profile picture
May 4
Comirnaty or Comirnaughty?

Fishy Findings from the Pfizer/BioNTech COVID Vaccine Clinical Trial Data

A🧵summarizing my collaborative investigation with @canceledmouse

(See tweets at end of thread for links to podcast discussion & blog post with more info & details.) Image
1/ Many trial subjects had positive PCR tests but were not counted as COVID cases for efficacy calculations.

We found that vaccinated subjects with positive PCR tests were *LESS* likely to be counted as a COVID case compared to the placebo group, at every step of the way: Image
2/ Why?

To be counted as a COVID case required you be symptomatic & have a positive PCR test result from Pfizer's *CENTRAL* lab.

But vaccinated subjects with a positive *LOCAL* test result were more likely to have a negative or missing central test result. Image
Read 16 tweets
Josh Guetzkow Profile picture
Apr 13
Interesting! The very first study that used the self-controlled case series (SCCS) method to study vaccine safety (from 1995) found that MMR vaccination greatly increased rate of aseptic meningitis (brain inflammation) by 10-14x among children 12-24 months old. Image
The SCCS method is widely used in vaccine safety studies, including by the CDC and @FLSurgeonGen.

The problem is that nowadays researchers usually only compare risk of adverse events soon after jab (like 1-21 days) vs. later risk post-jab (like 22-42 days).
It doesn't take a genius to realize that if vaccination increases the risk of an adverse event beyond 21 days, then this method is not likely to find anything.

It makes sense to compare to pre vs. post jab periods. The SCCS method allows this. But it's rarely done anymore.
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Send Email!

:(