Dr. Laura Robinson Profile picture
Sep 26 11 tweets 2 min read Twitter logo Read on Twitter
Okay, so, storytime.
I used to go to a church that had a "sex trafficking activism" group (which I've since learned is a thing, I cover it in my Hypersexuality article) where a group of guys there would go to strip clubs and ask women there if they needed help.
I don't know if
they went in or if they just waited menacingly in the parking lot when shift changes happen, but I remember joking with a friend "I bet they started that group in a hurry when their wives caught them at a strip club."
But then this interview with Radio Free Mormon dropped
yesterday of a former camera worker with Operation Underground Railroad who said that he documented a mission where a bunch of volunteers in the DR did *literally that,* just started going to strip clubs, getting lap dances, and going into private rooms to get "intel"
(there was no intel before the mission, this was just what the intel gathering process looked like).
This fits pretty well with Jimmy Rex's podcast this week where he described *his* work with OUR and said that about half the time they went to a city they were never able to
actually find anyone selling kids.
So, some thoughts.
1) The fact that people can spend days and weeks apparently slumming it in bars and clubs overseas while pestering people for trafficking information without turning up a thing almost makes you think that trafficking humans
isn't the most widespread thing ever and no one cares about it but Americans.
2) It's hard to not feel like this is just another manifestation of "but do you want to hinder the gospel" when a church leader is called out for bad behavior.
This is just the NGO version of it.
"But this is such a big problem," "do you want to criticize people doing the work," "maybe you should be criticizing the criticizers, not the people who actually do something," and the classic one, "but at least people were helped" -- this is the same "ends justify the means"
thinking that is ENDEMIC to Christian churches and politics, and apparently also NGOs and volunteering.
You might not be ethically opposed to going to strip clubs and getting lap dances. But you should have some ethical questions about 1) questioning a sex worker who hasn't been
accused of a crime while she's in the position of providing sexual services 2) using donor money to spend a night out that is indistinguishable from a bachelor party 3) approaching sex workers in parking lots after hours 4) doing any of this in a global south context where
a white guy with a handful of money has a lot of coercive power just by walking in the room.
And if your answer to this is "Well, the ends justify the means," I have to ask what makes any of this a distinctly Christian practice. If Christian churches, politics, and NGOs have
no discernibly Christian ethics and simply get the job done no matter who or what has to be done, why is this still Christian? And maybe this should be left up to non-Christian orgs, who seem to be able to organize effectively without doing this?

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Dr. Laura Robinson

Dr. Laura Robinson Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @LauraRbnsn

Sep 27
I know I've said this a million times, but:
I'm not claiming "trafficking isn't a big deal." I'm claiming that the term "trafficking" is creating more confusion than help.
The term is used to describe a range of phenomena that are caused by different underlying issues and
are solved in different ways.
Here are some widespread problems that are huge issues:
Drug addiction, which, secondarily, leads people to exploitative and dangerous sexual behavior to access drugs and money.
Drug addiction, which, secondarily, leads people
to pressuring their partners into exploitative and dangerous sexual behavior to access drugs and money.
Wage theft.
Undocumented immigrants being subject to inhumane work conditions.
Homeless children, which, secondarily, leads those kids to accepting abuse in exchange
Read 11 tweets
Sep 26

1/There’s a part in this pod where Megan draws attention to a truly ugly passage in the book For Women Only in which a pastor is described as saying about his wife that when he gets home from work he doesn’t want to hear about things like her housework,
gardening, or the kids – and this is strongly suggested to be a thing men generally feel. Basically, that the kinds of things women get up to to take care of their households aren’t interesting to their husbands, and husbands shouldn’t be expected to hear about or deal with it.
What Megan notes is that there’s a pretty ugly logic to this idea that women ought to be at home taking care of kids and this is the most important thing women do – in fact, they shouldn’t do anything else if it interferes with this most important work — but also their work is
Read 17 tweets
Sep 25
Okay, so here's something I heard in @sheilagregoire 's podcast.
There's a huge natural theology problem here between what claims are being made about men and whether it is good/by design and what is socialized and problematic (short thread).
Let's say you follow this book where it wants to go (don't, but) and arrive at the conclusion, produced by a Christian publisher, that men are filled with constant sexual desire, and it is incredibly difficult for any one man to be satisfied by a relationship with one woman,
and men are always on the lookout for sex with more women and that's why women need to help their husbands (being sexually available) and others (being sexually unavailable, covered up).
What's really bizarre about this is that it doesn't seem that Feldhahn arrives at the
Read 10 tweets
Sep 19
Answering objections from my Tim Ballard/Operation Underground Railroad series.
Okay. If you’re reading reports from @annamerlan et al and thinking “hey, at least kids were saved,” you’re actually not right and I’m going to explain why.
One thing that comes up again and
again in Lynn Packer’s writing is how much it seems like OUR’s intelligence is coming from newspapers- ie, this place has a lot of trafficking. They then clearly go there (this is extensively filmed) and make it very clear they will pay for kids, and insist on very young ones.
I think people are hearing this like you’re going into Old Navy and they don’t have a shirt in your size and you ask if they can check in the back. THE TRAFFICKERS DO NOT JUST HAVE THE KIDS. They talk in the footage about going to recruit them- from parents,
Read 8 tweets
Sep 18
Okay, I know I'm way too far down the hole on this one, but some today wrap up thoughts.
I started writing about Tim Ballard and OUR at the beginning of the summer because I was worried about the way Christians were digesting stories about the global south and social issues in
a way that was sentimentalized, flattened, emotionalized, and ultimately, not helpful. It turned into the writing project that filled the void the dissertation left in my life.
I have watched people, including very conservative people, get called p*dophiles to their faces if
they disliked a *freaking movie.* I heard multiple journalists get faced with the sincere question if they actually might support sex trafficking because they wanted to look at an organization's finances. Among people who latched onto this idea of Tim Ballard as an American
Read 14 tweets
Sep 13
Theory:
A lot of American Christianity is really good at producing scrupulosity but bad at producing repentance, and I think they are two sides of the same coin.
One thing I've been wondering about lately is, why do so many churches encourage thinking that fixates on being
"good enough" around largely inconsequential things (clothes, dating, thinking other people are attractive), but also -- when the chips are down, why does this scrupulosity so rarely translate into outrage against major offenses (abuse, infidelity, financial mismanagement?)
Why do so many of the same systems treats looking at porn three times a year a huge deal, but abusing a child is a minor issue that needs to be handled in house?
And I think it's a collision of bad theological instincts around justification theory.
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(