You know, one positive things I actually can say about Kirk is I can't imagine that he would want a database of people to track people who failed to praise him effusively enough after his death on pain of losing their livelihoods.

https://twitter.com/NathanJRobinson/status/1967280294282907803

I actually don't think threatening people into complimenting him was the kind of thing he invested his time in.
The witch hunt, if you look at the posts, has fully moved into trying to get people fired for insufficient grief or suspected insincerity when they say things

I don’t like bringing this up because we don’t know who did it and it doesn’t excuse violence either way.
But Kirk got his start by making a list of private citizens for supports to harass.
Remember the professor watch list?
I strongly favor civil dialogue but I truly am

https://twitter.com/realdailywire/status/1966238479005954530

struggling to think of a single person who has consistently modeled it.
I think the fantasy is much more along the lines of “monopolized chaos.” The dream of the day where WE are doing the attacking, but no defending.
That’s not peace. That’s not civility.

1/So, thinking about the economic news/price increases, and how this will impact how people see Trump.
My honest answer is "it won't."
I was definitely one of those people who followed all the NYT think pieces about trying to get out of my bubble and build bridges in 2016. It's been ten years. At this point, I think there's only three kinds of people who still really like Trump.
I’m not talking about low information, low participation voters who voted for him in Arkansas and didn’t really think about it because they didn’t think it mattered.

I think one odd aspect of Christian apologia for passages about wives in the NT that rankle is that we actually really overplay the oppression of women in the first century outside of Christian contexts.
It's obviously not entirely wrong but there's still a fair amount of data showing women doing things like initiating divorces, arranging their own marriages, and managing their own financial affairs.
In my last article I tried to not overly play the role of the "Rome apologist" but I do think a flattening narrative doesn't really serve anyone well.

So, two things to note.
1) When you look at the full context, there's a curtain in front of her. The guys don't know what she looks like. That's not a variable here either way.
2) The comments of "women have been lied to their whole life about what men want, we don't care about

https://twitter.com/FearedBuck/status/1955635262169723144

their hobbies or interests" are, I really hope, representative of Twitter guys only, because that is grim.
If you aren't interested in your girlfriend's hobbies, job, or interests... then what do you care about?
"Does it vagina?" Yes, I'm sure she vaginas, but also if your plan

I also think it's worth noting that whatever you're calling "Christianity" in the US basically rolls over completely every 10-15 years.
When I was a kid *the* Christian hangup was the objectification of women on TV and ads that sexualized them.
Now it's that women aren't

https://twitter.com/WalshFreedom/status/1954170962238193950

sexualized enough.
See also the frantic effort to eradicate dating in the 2000s, now replaced with the fear that boys aren't getting enough sex.

One historical myth I think has surprisingly long legs is the idea that for most of human history marriage was between a very young girl and a much older man.
We kinda get that idea laundered to us even through fantasy (Game of Thrones did this a lot) but the reality is just way more complicated in the west.
Yes, in the Roman Empire, you do see some urban records of older men marrying younger girls, but that was usually in contexts where those men's primary sources of income were estates they owned that were run by slaves or lending.

First, this story is horrible.
Second, I think what's even stranger about Trump is that in Trump's case, people usually have to repent on his behalf.
Trump can't actually bring himself to say "I did something awful but Jesus forgives me," so someone like Franklin Graham

https://twitter.com/RancidGinger/status/1948177785052385520

has to go out and say "Trump did something awful but he's so incredibly sorry and has asked Jesus for healing and cleansing." Then Trump strenuously denies he ever did such a thing if he's ever asked about it.
This has happened like nine times.
And, it's more than enough for MAGA

Off the top of my head, here's a list of ideas in Eddington that Eddington is 100 percent right about.
1) Some people who think they aren't racist, are racist and just haven't thought about it yet (A number of supposedly enlightened characters are incredibly quick to blame the

https://twitter.com/MadisonRaeGun/status/1946053876484043066

town's only black guy for a murder.)
2) People who are more interested in personal gain than their convictions are extremely easy to draw into and out of ideological movements (Brian goes from performative protestor to right wing politician).
3) More societal change is driven by

Another thing about the Mary-Joseph thing as I'm blogging about it.
One of the arguments I've also seen flying around is that men would usually be older than their wives in the ancient world, so the idea of Joseph being an old/older man is historically plausible.
1) Sort of. The pattern of girls marrying men ten-fifteen years older than them tended to be more of an urban phenomenon. In rural areas, though, wives and kids are workers. There's not really a normal rural channel to go work into your 30s and save up for a house so you can take

So, real quick, here's a list of things that are never stated in the Bible but often assumed when it comes to the "Jesus's siblings were all older half-siblings from Joseph's first marriage" thing.
1) "Joseph was much older than Mary." No. No ages are given of either Mary or

https://twitter.com/Sola_Requiem/status/1946338638255522047

Joseph, though Mary was probably in her teens if this was her first marriage. He doesn't appear in sequences in later part of Jesus's life where Mary appears, which has led to some speculation that he was dead. If he was dead, though, this doesn't mean he died in his 80s.

Yeah so Trump is all over these and is extremely incriminated. If his story is that the records were made by his enemies and we need to all move on, then I think it's pretty straightforward what's in there.
Why didn't Biden release it? Same reason Biden didn't fire Garland - the sense that the civil, decent thing to do, which the voters want to see, is everyone getting along. And, almost certainly some people personally close to that administration were also implicated/other favors were called in (Clinton, Andrew, maybe Gates.)

Couldn't get all these comments in one screenshot so unfortunately I'm just retweeting this guy.
Anyway - a few years ago when I reviewed Beautiful Union, one thing I kept running into is the fact that the agricultural metaphor for human reproduction isn't just biologically

https://twitter.com/ofcrdeonjoseph/status/1939560079776514511

wrong, it's that it actually does some really particular work to devalue motherhood -- and in fact, when you look at early Greek texts, this is ALWAYS how it functions. (One seed v two seed theories, look it up).
The one-seed agricultural metaphor posits that sperm is like a

I keep thinking about those studies like "65 percent of women under 30 are depressed" or "70 percent of college students are depressed" and I keep thinking there actually has to be some element of privilege there because everyone I know knows someone who would be called "depressed" if they were a white woman.
"Depression" is a state of affairs where you actually can pursue treatment options or talk about how you're feeling to manage your symptoms.
For guys who barely made it through high school and sit at home all day because there's no

Okay, I'm just going to put this out there as some free advice for people:
It's not good for a movement to have the stereotype that its members are all dumb hysterical psychos.
It's almost never completely true but if you put together some really unflattering images of public demonstrations and social media presence, some of you are definitely more of your own worst enemy than others.
And this is just something I want to put out there for people: When you are arguing for something, whether it's on the phone to your state legislature or to your

Okay, so, let's break this down.
Adriana Smith is braindead. That means there is no chance of recovery. She has no function in her entire brain, including the brain stem.
That means that all functions that keep Adriana alive are entirely artificial. Heart,
nbcnews.com/news/us-news/f… lungs, hormones -- it all has to come from doctors. This isn't a coma. She's not unconscious. She's dead - except for machines.
When Smith died, she was nine weeks pregnant.
Now, the situation is that she is being kept on all those machines, against the wishes of her family,

Yeah so let me walk you through how this goes:
1) Companies won't itemize their bills and will simply raise their prices. This means Trump can keep pretending, and telling you, that he's not taxing you, it's just that pesky Bidenflation
2) Trump cuts deals with some of his

https://twitter.com/JakeSherman/status/1917295552292643104

favorite billionaires so they don't pay import taxes. They do, though, keep prices high. You don't know about it, because your bill isn't itemized. Meanwhile Mom and Pop shops fold because they can't keep up with Trump's taxes. Darn Bidenflation, they say, and of course, Trump

So here's a thing I got asked when I was talking about teen birth rates and the national birth rate generally:
"If girls/women are most fertile from 15-30, why are we losing more than a decade to that for education for no good reason?"
I'm not going to entertain "why 15-17 year olds shouldn't have babies" because I think it's self explanatory, but I want to make one thing really clear.
If the reason a woman doesn't have babies until she's in her 30s is "because she wants to," that is not only an excellent reason, but the only reason that matters.

Things I Have Been Told Tariffs Do by Twitter
1) Raise IRS revenue by raising prices
2) Raise IRS revenue by charging other countries money, which US consumers don't pay
3) Bring back unionized manufacturing jobs
4) Bring back non unionized manufacturing jobs but hey at least it's a job right
5) Create jobs for STEM grads on the coasts, but that's really it, yeah
6) Protect small businesses
7) Wipe out small businesses but that's good because we don't need them
8) Replace the income tax (there is no plan for this)
9) Replace property taxes (literally

There's some interesting online pieces of data showing the extent to which it really does seem men think that the point of tariffs is to cause economic hardship *specifically for American women.*
Most of the articles I've read where women business owners are talking

https://twitter.com/maxlugavere/status/1908646961764589937

about the fear they will have to close up shop are besieged with comments like "you should make an OnlyFans" or "get married."
Not to be Freudian about this but I really do think the sub rational reason for a lot of this (and why no one can articulate a rational reason) is the

Hi Victoria.
One thing you and I don't have in common is -- I actually grew up in Indiana and I know what Hoosiers look like.
Crunchy Hoosiers are in Bloomington and, ten years ago, maybe Broadripple. They don't look like this. These are Waffle House Hoosiers. They were

https://twitter.com/RepSpartz/status/1906062431421714508

yelling because they are mad at you because you're doing a bad job. Go to a sports bar during the NCAA tournament and you'll see them doing the same thing at basketball coaches. They're not mad because they're far left plants, they're mad because you suck and they know it.