Conservatives love to say “We’re not a democracy we’re a constitutional republic” but of course that’s not really true and it gets less true by the day
When the will of the people is your legitimating mechanism mass democratization will slowly consume everything 🧵/1
The dialectical energy always moves in the direction of removing restrictions and expanding benefits
There’s always a political incentive to expand the franchise and remove barriers to the popular will /2
Conservatives think that allowing illegal immigrants to vote or removing the electoral college are ridiculous proposals, but they have no real argument against them because they’ve already bought into the logic of mass democracy /3
The US has vastly expanded the franchise, removed the fundamental differentiation from their two legislative houses by mandating the direct election of senators, and altered the election of presidential candidates through the primary process /4
The electoral college will inevitably fall because it can’t withstand the universal acid of popular will, which conservatives have completely bought in to /5
Illegals will inevitably receive amnesty and the franchise will be extended to them because conservatives have already bought into the idea that hat mass participation in government is the essence of America, it would contradict their own ideology to deny it /6
Democracy will inevitably consume itself because it has to
Once you embrace the tenets of mass democracy there’s no real argument against letting it destroy any limiting institutions /7
Conservatives are in bad spot because their goals and their ideology do not align, and they have been told that looking outside that ideology a betrayal of their values
But nothing could be further from the truth 8/8
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The problem with "climate change" isn't the idea that we should honor our land and preserve it, the GOP approach of "Who cares about tomorrow burn it all down for money now" is as boomer as it gets, but conservatives are right to doubt the motives of environmentalists 🧵/1
The problem is the notion that the climate is just another system over which we have gained perfect knowledge and can exercise total control
Even the phrase "climate change" is an obvious piece of newspeak /2
The environmentalists used to talk about global warming, there was at least a logic to this because there was an argument about man made pollution and how it impacted the planet's temperature /3
The GOP has no plan to deal with the ballot harvesting scam and no hope of catching up with the party that implemented it in the first place
In the classic cycle Dems change the rules and benefit from being the first mover
The left already laid the groundwork and controls the infrastructure, allowing them to manipulate the procedure
The GOP refuses to call legitimacy into question so it has no option but to play a game that’s already rigged without even having a team ready to play
This is why the GOP is doomed, they can’t even imagine pulling a stunt like the Dems did, funding and organizing a complete transformation and takeover of the electoral system during a national emergency
"A democracy is nothing more than mob rule, where 51% of the people may take away the rights of the other 49%." — Thomas Jefferson
"Democracy never lasts long. It soon wastes, exhausts, and murders itself. There never was a democracy yet that did not commit suicide." — John Adams
"Democracies have ever been spectacles of turbulence and contention; have ever been found incompatible with personal security or the rights of property; and have in general been as short in their lives as they have been violent in their death." — James Madison
For those who need it spelled out for them: The purpose of popularizing a holiday no one had ever heard of which focused on slavery a few weeks ahead of Independence Day was always to replace July 4th
Conservatives, who refuse to understand how this works, rush forward to get "free" leftist points by showing how against slavery they are, like that was ever a real question
Formal religions were essentially banned from being adopted by government organizations, taught in schools, and eventually from even participating in the public square 2/
Because progressivism, or wokeness if you prefer, has no holy book or formal church it faces no such restrictions, and because humans are deeply narrative and religious creatures we will inevitably adopt such a framework 3/