Tweet

More from @RichardHanania

Richard Hanania

@RichardHanania

Sep 24

I write about whether cancel culture has peaked. The phrase itself is from a monoculture that not longer exists.

We see a great bifurcation. On the right, it's almost impossible to get canceled for being un-PC. Left-wing institutions are as bad as ever.🧵 richardhanania.com/p/how-to-not-g…

Up until about a decade ago, elite institutions had an ability to cancel people even on the right. This was done through a handful of conservative gatekeepers that granted legitimacy. This was killed by greater polarization and social media and other new market forces.

15 years ago, right wingers would talk about how National Review personally hurt them. A young person reading today would probably be completely puzzled by this. Who cares about one magazine? It was a tiny intellectual and media ecosystem that could easily exclude people.

Read 11 tweets

Richard Hanania

@RichardHanania

Sep 15

New York City just released a report titled "Crime and Enforcement Activity in New York City" for 2022. It tracks the identities of victims, suspects, and arrestees. Here are some of the highlights.

For context, NYC is about 32% white, 29% Hispanic, 23% black, and 14% Asian🧵

Let's start with "Misdemeanor Criminal Mischief." Here, the numbers are relatively even given what we'll see below. Black are only 50% of suspects and a smaller portion of arrestees.

In the area of murder, blacks are 63.8% of suspects, 57.8% of arrestees. Whites are only 2.9% of suspects. Interestingly, Asians commit murder at a higher rate than whites in NYC, a pattern we'll see in other crimes. I would guess this has something to do with age distributions

Read 15 tweets

Richard Hanania

@RichardHanania

Sep 15

From 1936-1939, the federal government interviewed 2,300 ex-slaves in 17 states.

2/3 were over 80. By 1936, it had been 71 years since emancipation, so most had been young when they became free.

🧵on what was found, and how historians have used the interviews.

What’s most shocking to modern ears is the fact that many remembered slavery fondly. In the words of one interviewee: “Right now, I loves my marster an' his wife in de grave. Dey raised me an' showed me kindness all dey lives. I was proud of dem."

Another talked about having plenty to eat, including sausages, beef, and possum, and enough clothes to wear.

Read 21 tweets

Richard Hanania

@RichardHanania

Jul 31

People talk about bureaucracy and the slowdown in scientific and medical progress. Here's the story of one important piece of that reality: the HIPAA privacy rule, and the damage that it has caused, along with the concept of privacy more generally.🧵richardhanania.com/p/privacy-vers…

In 1996, President Clinton signed HIPAA. It required healthcare providers to make sure they safeguard "protected health information."

The government then created around 700 pages of dense legalese to figure out what that meant. Keeping up became a full-time job.

Most medical researchers says this significantly added to their burdens. One study that was ongoing during the Privacy Rule debate went from recruiting 12 pregnant women per week to 2-6.

The University of California lost the free access to the cancer registry it used to have.

Read 11 tweets

Richard Hanania

@RichardHanania

Jul 21

People know about affirmative action in universities, medicine, etc, but what about in government?

What does it mean when constituencies are more worried about their politicians looking like them than performance?

Here's the story of Eddie Jordan, New Orleans DA, 2003-2007 🧵

Jordan was at first a federal prosecutor. He oversaw the prosecution of Louisiana governor Edwin Edwards for corruption.

At the same time, he refused to prosecute politician Cleo Fields, even though the FBI had him on video stuffing $25K from Edwards into his pocket

Why prosecute Edwards and not Fields? We may never know.

Read 15 tweets

Richard Hanania

@RichardHanania

Jul 20

A lot of people have argued that the Supreme Court ruling on affirmative action won't matter.

Here's the first case showing it does, from the Eastern District of Tennessee.

Special preferences for minority-owned businesses are found unconstitutional.🧵 storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco…

A business owned by a white woman sued the Department of Agriculture and the Small Business Administration.

The Section 8(a) program is based on a 1979 bill.

"Disadvantaged" businesses received privileges in contracting, and minority-owned businesses qualified automatically

SFFA v Harvard was decided on Fourteenth Amendment grounds. The reasoning of the decision applies to whenever the government discriminates based on race. That's clearly what's going on here, and the program must be judged under strict scrutiny.

Read 10 tweets

Share this page!

Enter URL or ID to Unroll

Richard Hanania

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

More from @RichardHanania

Richard Hanania

Richard Hanania

Richard Hanania

Richard Hanania

Richard Hanania

Richard Hanania

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Send Email!