Ryan Denton Profile picture
Sep 27 10 tweets 2 min read Twitter logo Read on Twitter
Why it’s time to bring back the robe 🧵 Image
1. Every Sunday, ministers make a conscientious decision on how they'll present themselves to the church. This could mean skinny jeans & t shirt; business suit/tie; rolled up sleeves & tattoos; Hawaiian shirt & flip flops; NFL jerseys; or dress shirt and slacks.
2. But the informality of fashion has affected how we see the preaching office & how we approach God in the divine service. Has informal dress led to weaker pulpits? Weakened views of the pulpit? Diminishing respect for the regular worship service? Absolutely.
3. The robe hides the person behind the office of minister. The man recedes; the office comes to the fore. Pastors are dads, husbands, buddies. But when preaching the Word, leading services, & administering the sacraments, they are ambassadors & ministers of God. 1 Thes. 2:13
4. Every vocation & office uses clothing to distinguish itself: police officers, doctors, judges, construction workers (vests & hard hats), etc. This shows they don't act/speak for themselves. They are under orders. They are competent. The Genevan robe helps convey the same.
5. The Genevan robe obscures the fashion preference of the minister: nice tie, ugly suit, bling bling, cool tats, etc. The robe draws attention away from the person and towards the office of minister.
6. The robe reminds the minister of his duty. Psychologically, it is harder to be a clown or comedian in the pulpit when garbed in the robe.
7. It sets the tone of the service. The robe creates a healthy solemnity & reverence that is missing in most churches today. The congregation is reminded of what the divine service is about.
8. Clothing & calling go together. Is it coincidence that as the Genevan robe was discarded, the church became more loose in doctrine and practice? Considering the looseness of our pulpits & the flippancy of most congregations, isn’t time for a sturdy dose of the old way?
Conclusion: The Genevan robe has been the garb of choice for Reformers & Presbyterians for 500 years. Even the Baptists used to wear them. This opinion is more a matter of practicality & sanctified wisdom, not something binding, but its time to make the Genevan robe great again. Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Ryan Denton

Ryan Denton Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @TexasPreacher

Jul 27
Why paedocommunion is unbiblical, unwise, and not Reformed. 🧵
Baptism vs. Lord’s Supper

Baptism is passive: “be baptized,” meaning something done to the recipient. Baptism is sign of initiation into church; God’s promise to us

Lord’s Supper is active: take & eat; examine; do this “in remembrance.” Calvin: requires “the mouth of faith”

1/
Baptism vs Lord’s Supper cont…

WLC 177: Baptism is to be administered but once, with water, to be a sign and seal of our regeneration and ingrafting into Christ, and that even to infants;

2/
Read 12 tweets
Mar 24
🧵 Part 2: why I went from 1689 to WCF; from baptist to presby; from credo to paedobaptism. (See part 1 from last week)

Still love my 1689 brothers & would go to war w/them any day of the week.🔥😤👊🧨But the WCF is simply more consistent.
Jer 31:31: "new" means "a new iteration of something previously existing."

There are options Jer could've used: brand new, etc. He picks the word that means an updated version, a better version. NOT brand new. Same thing in Hebrews.

1 covenant of grace; 2 administrations
Mosaic Cov part of C.O.G.:

1) God maintains His covenant w Abraham, Isaac, Jacob in spite of Israel’s repeated unfaithfulness (Ex 32; Psa 106:23; Num 16:45–50)

2) a formal gospel preaching was offered continually by symbols/ types: Christ revealed!

3) ppl saved by faith alone
Read 12 tweets
Mar 17
🧵on why I went from 1689 to 1646; from baptist to presby; from credo to paedobaptism…

If you’re not a presby when you reach the other end, are you really being honest😤Love my Baptist brothers👊
1

God works in households; this is the general paradigm…

1. Noah’s family spared bc of his faith
2. God tells Abraham He will be God to him & his seed
3. Passover: whole family is spared by faith of one person applying blood to doorpost
4. Rehab’s family spared bc of her faith
2

Of the 9 baptism narratives in the NT, 6 of them are household baptisms. The other 3?

1. Paul, who had no family
2. Ethiopian eunuch, who had no family
3. Simon the magician…family unknown

Although an argument “from silence,” the silence is deafening. God works in houses.
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(