🧵A draft would be imperial suicide

The army war college, neo-con publications, think tanks...

All of them have their knickers in a knot trying to talk the American regime up into reinstituting a draft.

Part of this collapsing recruitment with most US armed services now 10-25% below their annual recruitment targets.

Which combined with the hard DC consensus that under no circumstance, in no scenario, not to save the republic... will an Infantry Private EVER make more than an entry-level DC paper pusher with a master's degree nor will VA benefits ever be more reliable than that DC paper-pusher's...

(No way they're going to try to tempt the oil rig workers, lumberjacks, or crab fishermen away with pay and benefits commiserate with hard, dangerous, outdoors work)

That problem isn't going to be solved.

.

Now this would not be a problem, America rules the waves, and the international financial system, and has two oceans and two allies providing security for nearly 10,000 miles around...

(Or well OK Mexico is a massive security hole... but DC doesn't care and considers that a benefit, so same difference)

EXCEPT: Washington wants a war with China.

Now this wouldn't be a problem since America again controls the Waves, the Financial system, has bases in 150 out of 200ish countries, has allies all over the world with billions of potential troops, oh and is almost entirely internally self reliant with all the oil, natural gas, food production, and resources it'd need to weather decades of blockade (if it could somehow lose the sea) directly within North America...

Whereas China has almost no natural resources, a supply line for oil and fertilizer that stretches tens of thousands of miles through the straits of Malacca, Hormuz and other key choke points America could shut down in an instant, is surrounded by enemies... and has an economy and population that are both in terminal decline (both are about to start shrinking in absolute terms like Japan in the 90s, if indeed they haven't already)

So this should be the easiest war ever... park an aircraft carrier by Singapore, let the sailors bankrupt themselves trying to hire a prostitute in the most expensive city on earth... and point and laugh as China desperately tries and fails to reroute all of its international energy and food base trade through the Trans-Siberian railway as the last of the Mainland Han Chinese go bankrupt from their failure to build a domestic market, and die-out of Blue-Balls from their failure to breed.

Hell Putin might even negotiate a lasting peace with NATO at the end of it, he'd so enjoy the highway robbery prices he'd charge.

It should be the easiest war ever... Any old-school royal navy captain would be salivating at the risk-free merchant prize money he'd rake in by the BILLION...

Except America doesn't want that war.

America doesn't want to play Britain to China's Napoleonic France. America doesn't want to get rich picking off China's trade whilst funding any one of China's dozen of enemies it's likely to lash out at as it flounders and drowns...

America wants a high-casualty war over Taiwan.

And when they saw Ukraine, and how deadly peer ground-war is against a technologically advanced enemy... They didn't ask if they should fight an even deadlier war over Taiwan, they salivated and asked HOW.

America WANTS thousands of Marines, Sailors, and Soldiers to die daily fighting in ruthless trench and urban warfare in the middle of a tropical island 7000 miles from home as its ships and carriers are sunk with thousands of hands onboard, under a rain of hypersonic ballistic missiles, 200 miles from the Chinese mainland and 7000 miles from Los Angeles, with its supply lines under constant danger of being severed and the threat of Nuclear escalation around every corner...

WHY!?

BECAUSE WASHINGTON DC WANTS IT.

Taiwan has zero strategic value, its chip manufacturing is easily destroyed by a US strike and nothing about the tech could not be replicated by the US whilst the US wins the easy geo-economic war...

Except America doesn't WANT to win an easy economic war, Washington DC want a million dead in a tropical Verdun + Stalingrad against a country with a population of 1.4 billion.

And if America's young won't volunteer to die like this then they'll draft their teenage boys and make them die with a gun pointed at their back.

.

This is how much America hates it boys.

Never forget this. Never feel you owe these people a thing. Buy a gun. Practice tax [redacted].

.

Except of course, a draft wouldn't work.

Set aside the fact that 70+% are completely unfit to be conscripted... set aside the fact that we just had a "medical emergency" which taught everyone they should bribe and fake medical wavers as soon as possible... Set aside the fact that the border patrol is at its breaking and there are now millions of Americans who've spent an inordinate amount of time contemplating the tissue paper security of land and sea borders...

Set all that aside... Americans hate the government and have vastly more arms than the federal government could hope to command against them.

Black, white, latino, man, woman, gay, straight, Democrat, republican... Americans are unified in one sentiment:

That the American government is illegitimate and set up to screw them and their group specifically.

Ask as democrat about the electoral college or 2016, ask a Republican about voter ID or 2020...

Turns out that when you implement inconsistent and capricious rules the groups that benefit are not nearly as grateful as the group that suffers comes to loath you... repeat that enough times and everyone hates you.

.

Of course, a suitably tyrannical and totalitarian state could overcome this... And if you think the US is anywhere near being able to even potentially enforce this with authoritarian methods you are completely delusional and out of touch with the numbers.

.

I've read almost a dozen paper now suggesting the US reinstitute a draft or that it would need a draft in a war with China...

I've not seen a single paper suggest how that could be achieved. My ctrl-F on "Press Gangs" is strangely somehow always 0/0 in these pieces.

Strange.

.

America's compliance rate most things is shockingly low compared to most countries... And its crime rate is consistently high. Whether its the homicide rate or vaccination rate, America's compliance with rules of any kind, legitimate and illegitimate, ten commandments or tax code, drops off massively around 3 groups of people: African Americans, Latinos, and Whites of Scots-Irish ie. borderer (Hill billy) descent (a double-digit percentage of all whites).

These people will not comply, in massive numbers, and unless you're willing to start a hot civil war enacting violence against them for their non-compliance (and immediately start wars in America's cities, forests, and a war with cartels seeing an opening)... If you're not willing to do that then their non-compliance will immediately cripple every effort to force compliance on the rest of the population the same way Vax-Mandates had little coercive power in the US compared to elsewhere.

Also, remember any institutional penalties meant to extort compliance with bureaucracy will be completely zapped of their sting, both because Jimmy Carter was the president... We KNOW draft dodging will be pardoned within a decade of the end of the crisis (sooner if the draft dodging and protests are effective and America loses quickly)... AND because right now dozens of Amercian cities and states are setting up infrastructure to create entirely new identities and live off the grid as an illegal.... sorry, "undocumented" immigrant.

.

So I ask: Why when I hit ctrl-F do none of these supposedly serious commentators mention PRESS GANGS!?

Masked men with guns Grabbing Americans and immigrants off the street kicking the crap out of them and throwing them in the back of unmarked white vans to become "soldiers" such as we've seen in Ukraine is basically the only way a draft could be effectively enforced in this country....

And of course because of federalism, the US does not even have the men, vans, or ski masks.

Local counties and states control their police forces and the disproportionately obese and elderly men who'd be called upon to kidnap teenage boys off the streets or out of their parents homes...

And as has been clearly established with sanctuary state laws, California's Drug Legalization, and all the "Second Amendment Sanctuary" laws now working their way through red states...

These non-federal police forces are under ZERO (0) obligation to cooperate or assist with federal law enforcement like immigration enforcement, or drug enforcement, or draft enforcement.

That leaves the police forces the federal government controls itself... Yes. The Feds.

Nazi Germany had 32,000 employees of the Gestapo and 100,000 SS members before they expanded to become another armed forces on the eastern front...

This for 70 million people or about 1 secret policeman for every 530 people.

the Postwar East German Stasi had 91,000 regular secret police 174,000 informal secret police for a population of 18 million...

About 1 for every 68 people.

And this was to control the famously high trust, high morale, rules-following Germans.

By contrast the FBI has 35,000 employees. The DEA 5000 agents. The Border Patrol 21,000 (and they'd be pretty busy keeping people in). The ATF 5000. 7000 secret service.

Hell throw in the US Coast Guard (who'd be damned busy in a naval war) for 47000 (active and reserve).

For maybe 121,000 federal "enforcement" personnel... and probably half to a third of that accessible.

But taking 121k, that's 1 potential secret policeman for 2727 Americans. And realistically closer to a third of that.

This is why I laufgh at Online right wingers who think there's a fed listening to everything they say and do and trying to infiltrate their circles at every opportunity... man per man they're some of the least surveilled people to exist in history.

And I'll remind you, Americans have guns, lots of them. Many Americans everyday-carry a hidden gun or two on their person.

Sure you might think ordinary Americans would just comply with being dragged off to die in some miserable pointless war and no parent would seek out revenge on the federal agent who nabbed them...

but one need only look at American policing today to know that the very fact the guns are out there makes American cops A) A little jumpy, B) Aggressive in how they move C) Rather likely to just back off and take an L or fail to enforce and D) Unlikely to do much of anything without a sizeable number of fellow officers backing them up.

You can watch videos where routine evictions are enforced by a half dozen cops! American police do very little without numbers... And that cripples the number of enforcement actions you can take.

If you need a partner with you to do anything your force can do half the things. If you need a 4 man team 25%.

Considering there were numerous shootouts in America over mask mandate enforcement, and Teenage American boys in certain neighborhoods regularly shoot each other over rap lyrics and Nike shoes... and Teenage girls in Apalachia murder each other all the time over boys...

So ya America's hypothetical fed-powered press-gangs would basically be helpless to conscript any of the numbers they'd need.

Meanwhile, the attempt to do so would almost certainly start a civil war.

When the first shootout happens between federal press-gangers what do you expect regime media and their clapping seal congressmen to do?

Call for a gun ban.

What do you think the Supreme Court would do in the midst of a war where they've repeatedly shown they'll stay mum on absolutely everything labelled "national security"?

Nothing.

How do you think the federal government will enforce its new gun ban when everyone is already stretched thin fighting a war or fighting Americans to force them to fight the war?

Very very poorly.

.

The US military and foreign policy establishment seems hellbent on taking a geostrategic trade and proxy war that a third-rate British admiral would be able to win without firing a shot...

And turning it into a hot Amphibious war in southeast Asia they have no way to win, whilst pre-commiting that they'll double down and start a civil war over it which they're guaranteed to lose.

.

Functionally America is an hourglass-shaped empire.

It's really two empires barely connected.

It is a 19th century land empire conquered by American settler populace,

and it is a 20th century Maritime and global empire conquered by the US Navy and barely closeted communist bureaucrats along with the foreigners they funded.

These two empires barely interact, indeed America is is amongst the most autarkic economies in the world with 90% of its trade flows isolated to North America.

The place they meet, the narrow center of this hourglass is Washington DC.

And here's the thing, whereas Washington is consistently able to push about its overseas maritime empire sending troops and its agents into Afghanistan or Korea or Vietnam or Ukraine whilst all of its bureaucrats and tax collectors remain safe behind the twin moats of its oceans, and the mountain that is the curvature of the earth, the north pole on its other... and its completely open border with Mexico on its fourth, but no one cares about that...

Whilst Washington remains completely safe from any threat to its 20th-century Maritime empire...

Washington's 19th-century land empire has it by the throat.

Bin Laden is the only one of Washington's Maritime enemies to actually strike the Imperial city. And all his followers involved paid with their lives to do so.

The Jan 6th protestors showed up to change the result of an election, forced their way into Capitol... and then left, the vast majority of them never facing any consequence... and they didn't even have to bring guns.

The only shot that day killed Ashley Babbit, an unarmed protestor.

Something the Kaiser, Hilter, and Moa Tse Tung never dreamed, was achieved in one afternoon by ticked-off TrumpenProletariot driving in a few hours from the surrounding states.

If the 19th-century American land empire feels at all threatened by the 20th-century American Maritime empire... Most likely they'll descend on DC and severe their only connection with it.

.

So ya, implementing a draft to fight a war with China is about the dumbest military idea imaginable. One of those things that could actually cause the country to just implode.

So expect the Military and think tank establishment to keep promoting it!

You don't signal your usefulness and loyalty by proposing restrained smart ideas, you get that promotion by showing your willingness to say the dumbest thing possible if you think it fits your boss's agenda.

Just pray to god our leaders aren't so senile as to believe the yes men around them...

...

sweet Jesus.
Image
P.S. Follow me!

Keep hearing from people that they were following me and then they're mysteriously unfollowed.

I blame the feds.
P.P.S.

Checkout my blog:

"Reaper Drones over Houston: War in Mexico Would Mean War in America"

On why a US military intervention against the Mexican Cartels is a horrible idea that would possibly spell the end of the Republic.

tinyurl.com/ReaperDronesOv…
Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with CatGirl Kulak 😻😿 (Anarchonomicon)

CatGirl Kulak 😻😿 (Anarchonomicon) Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @FromKulak

Sep 26
Thanks to boomer-funded feminism and employment law, white women are now at the point where they have to approach men and live through the hell of dating as sales...

Or they'll die alone after their ovaries explode into dust.

Sounds drastic but there's basically no societal way out of it now that white men approaching women is treated on a par with a criminal sex offense by 10-15% of the population.

.

Also ditch your fat feminist friends, they're trying to ensure you die alone so they'll have company for the last hellish 50 years of their life.
Image
Like seriously where do women think men will approach them?

I frequent used bookstores... these are kind of uncommon... A guy can't approach me at a used bookstore lest I turn out to be a feminist, make a scene/they side with the screeching woman and ban him, and now he has to drive another 40 min to the nearest used book store... FOREVER!

Do you think a guy's cute that you see at your favourite coffee shop every day?

Guess what, it's his favorite coffee shop too! He might actively dream about you, but not want to ask you out lest you screech and now he's lost his favorite coffee shop!

This is why men pick up women at bars! There are hundreds of them!

it doesn't matter if a woman has moment, worse case some white knight punches him in the face and he looks kinda chadly next time he asks
Image
Read 5 tweets
Sep 16
🧵1/
It's hard to grasp Nietzschean Master morality. In our sickly guilt-poisoned era the instinctual values of healthy ubermenchean man are almost entirely Alien

However, shockingly, America has produced a perfect artifact of healthy noble natural values:

The Disney Princess. Image
2/

The Disney Princess is the perfect archetype of easy natural inherent nobility and morality.

She is an artifact of inborn virtue, a born noble, irrespective of parentage.

With the naive careless values that come from an easy mastery of her domain Image
3/
From this metaphysical nobility (occasionally paired with political nobility) she is reduced to the lowest station, a servant, a wanderer, a cripple, an enlistee

Only for her innate nobility to reveal itself and for her to win her rightful station and an apex man with it Image
Read 19 tweets
Sep 8
🧵Why no one wants to Join the Military🧵

I've been reading "The Second World War" by Sandhurst military Historian John Keegan...

It explained a ton about 19th century/early 20th century military culture I didn't get.

The Edwardians were patriotic as hell. the Military was massively popular.

The Average person ate 1200 calories a day, whereas soldiers in Garrison ate 1400 and higher quality food at that, it was a massive education and networking opportunity for people of all classes, and produced bonds that would be necessary for social advancement.

Conscription was massively popular and demanded from the population during peacetime, less because they wanted to make sure no one was shirking, and more because they didn't want lower class people left behind and all the opportunity in the army horded by the connected who'd be able to get into a volunteer force.

In Britain which had always abhorred conscription and had Whig (proto-libertarian) objections to it... the populace practically rebelled and formed illegal regiments and militias and drilled to participate in martial life... this was a phenomenon across europe and after the treaty of Versailles restricting Germany to a scant 100,000 strong army, the country was flooded with Freikrops, non-government paramilitaries and militias to either advance some political movement or just be part of militiary life.

This was after WW1! Millions of young men had just died as part of regiments many little different than this. And yet there was this much demand from young men to be part of the martial world.

This is because the Military and military life was ACTUALLY a good career move, and ACTUALLY formed life long bonds in the early 20th century.

Amidst the population boom of the early 20th century and all the excess young men with little inheritance... the military and militia life was a major vehicle for social mobility and aspiration and forming social connections...

.

So what changed? Why is it almost completely the opposite in early 21st century America?

These attitudes survived the world wars, even the western front of WW1...

But they were devoured by Vietnam and the Civil Rights era.

Implicit in a lot of 19th and 20th century militarism was the vision of "Every Soldier a Citizen, Every Citizen a Soldier" this ethos was first expressed during the french revolution... It was aspirational. The subjects divorced from the state and military were now armed and able to participate in civic and military life, they were now citizens... of course by the early 20th century this sounds very menacing... Soldiers must obey orders, every day... if every citizen is a soldier, and bound to obey, on pain of death, that's Totalitarianism.

Indeed a friend recently said "You know the Weimar Republic may have been the only true democracy in history. We talk about how your vote matters and you're deciding your government, but really the public has little say. Barrack Obama vs. John McCain was literally the option presented to America, that was their spectrum of options... whereas Weimar Germany? They had Monachism, Liberalism, Communism, Fascism All RIGHT THERE on the Ballot, and any of them could win! And one of them did"

It wasn't a coincidence that this seeming pinnacle of democracy, exactly coincided with, and produced, the era when the most men were in uniform (and many women in Auxillaries)

The ethos of universal suffrage and universal conscription went hand in hand... with the contradiction it implies: Are you master of your country? Or is every other person in your country now master of you? Are you empowered with your rife to move the politics of europe? Or have you been enslaved to your state, people, and their fate?

One might think this is the source of the disillusionment, but America had conscription and its 1940s martial ethos through the 50s and into the 60s...

But of course there's a contradiction between UNIVERSAL suffrage and this masculine martial conception of the citizen... Why is the vote of a woman or disabled man who've never served equivalent to a man who's been taxed years of his life and often extraordinary risk and effort? How exactly does racial equality work when some groups are underrepresented in military life, or are perceived to be underrepresented in the most dangerous roles?

These Questions were papered over with discrimination.

"What did you do during the war?" was an interview question that made or broke your entire economic life in a world where a massive percentage of people had served... This was a massive inducement to do so, and indeed you could still hear concerns about "missing" a war in the 50s and being shut out of the aspirations and opportunities available to other "Luckier" cohorts of young men. Obviously even though there was little legal barrier to women fulfilling most corporate and professional roles, this fact of life was a massive barrier.

But then the 64 Civil Rights Act was passed and the logic of it necessitated Affirmative action to women, and underrepresented minorities, whilst at the same time a new generation of upper-middle-class young men, insulated by one of the most abundant and forgiving economies in world history were encouraged by family and friends to either avoid the draft with bogus medical excuses , hide out in university, or indeed dip out of the country for a spell...

And far from suffering a fatal blow to their career and social prospect for, what previous generation would have called, Cowardice... they were rewarded.

Military service became increasingly a marker of the lower class... and the Liberal Educated non-serving class, already critical of the war out of self-serving concern to not be draft... Latched onto tales of war crimes in Vietnam, often going so far as insulting and aspitting (literally or figuratively) on returning soldiers not wealthy enough to dip into university. There were no return parades, GI benefits were often non-existent (with some unable to healthcare for even Malaria (a disease a new yorker probably didn't catch at home))... And not only were they not given priority in employment, lacking both the right ethnicity and the university degrees which are the only qualifications protected from a disparate impact assessment... many fell to the bottom of the economic ladder.

America's Recruitment Capacity really has never recovered. Total US military personnel shrank from 3.5 in 1969, to 2 million in 1985 to 1.3 million today, even as the US population has increased from 200 million to 330 million.

America has gone from over 1% of the population actively serving at any one time to nearly a third of that.

The "Professionalization" of the US military to an "All Volunteer force" has in effect just been a cover for this collapse in recruiting capacity.

America's military isn't significantly structurally different. These aren't really professionals.

Your average 3 year contract private isn't making some obscene Yuppie amount of money for his ambitious professional commitment. A private makes under 30k a year. A Second Lieutenant, with a university degree and years of professional development, who may have had to plan out his career from 16 years old getting a Congressman's letter of recommendation to attend West Point or another service academy... Makes 40-60k a year.

US GDP per capita is 72k. If that Lieutenant had gone to a second tier school and gotten a Computer Science degree he'd be making 6 figures and have vastly more control over his life.

It's not a good career move, in the 1780s or 1900s and ambitious scion of a decayed noble family desiring to conquer the world might want to become an artillery officer... Today he wants to work on wall street or at Google.

Even if you're starting out from a very rough place there ar almost certainly a dozen better things you could do to advance yourself faster, for better money, and with less effort than joining the Military.

The only appeal of the US military, for decades now, has been to people who really want to escape their situation, who really felt they needed to hard reboot their life, or who are really drawn to military life out of sheer love of it.

And then the Army went woke.

Wokeness is toxic to the Army not just because of the values clash with most ordinary recruits... but it places front and center the entire dynamic that makes the military such an awful career path.

Not only are young men not enticed to join the military out of the knowledge that they're wasting years not getting a university degree, or that their Gender, skin colour, and sexual orientation are still going to count against them even once they're out... They're now having it declared to them that they'll suffer that distain and discrimination even in the military, incvariably by some fat university educated minority woman brought in to give a diversity lecture.

Even whilst you're serving the US government its going to rub your face in the fact that it's undermining you and your career... And it's somehow a mystery the army can't recruit?

The US Military is taking close to half of the people it took in the 1980s... and it still can't find anyone.

Meanwhile its not uncommon to hear in various forums open talk from active military that if the US military were used in an internat war against dissent by the Trumpenproletariat... They'd desert. Indeed Anonymous leaked US military wargaming projects something close to a 50% desertion rate in any major civil conflict.

And there's nothing to be done to save it. There's no will to double or triple pays to reflect GDP or what similar effort could get a person in the US economy (don't enlist, go Fracking or Alaskan crab Fishing) there's no political will to undo the bizarre system of racial and sexual patronage that benefits everyone except the productive class that drives the US economy... and there's no way any of the elite would recreate a world where military service was a better guarantee of job prospects and financial security than a university degree.

So America's effective recruitment capacity and civic feeling will continue to collapse even as Americans hate each other and their government even more.

You think recruit capacity is bad now? Wait til they imprison Trump.
Image
Checkout my piece on the other US mess brewing:

"Reaper Drones over Houston: A War in Mexico Would Mean War in America"

On why a US military intervention against the Mexican Cartels is a horrible idea that would possibly spell the end of the Republic.

tinyurl.com/ReaperDronesOv…
Image
P.S. if you liked this piece... Follow me!

I'm constantly surprised at the number of people who will DM me or post replies to compliment my writing, but aren't twitter followers.
Read 4 tweets
Sep 5
🧵Fedposting is your Civic Duty🧵
(Not legal advice)
1/

Probably no secret police force in world history has achieved a greater psychological victory than the US letter Agencies in the 21st century.

The tabooing of "FedPosting" is now almost total on the internet. Image
2/
On dissident forums across the web no sooner has someone advocated revolution or invoked the image of a guillotine before the accusation of "Fed" starts flying

Statements are said to "Glow" and participants called "Glowies" if they advocate anything but ineffective activism Image
3/

In this the letter agencies and particularly the FBI have achieved a psychological victory over dissenters to the regime greater than almost any security force in the history of the modern world...

And they have won this without any legal grounding whatsoever. Image
Read 19 tweets
Sep 4
🧵
1/

Americans don't understand class. American socialists especially

Every week i hear: "How can Trump be considered anti-elite? He's a billionaire!?"

This fundamentally misunderstands class. its not how much you have, its how you make it.

And Trump definitely ain't elite Image
2/

Classic Marxist economics divides class via the individual's means of securing resources.

The proletariat trade their labour to employers for wages.

The bourgeoise use their ownership of the means of production to extract surplus value from the proletarian laborer

etc. Image
3/

Sure this usually resulted in the bourgeoise being wealthier than the proles.. but not always. Some decayed bourgeoise barely made more than proles, while many successful skilled proles earned as much as lower tier bourgeoise.

These were dubbed the labour aristocracy Image
Read 16 tweets
Aug 16
🧵1/
It's hard to grasp Nietzschean Master morality. In our sickly guilt-poisoned era the instinctual values of healthy ubermenchean man are almost entirely Alien

However, shockingly, America has produced a perfect artifact of healthy noble natural values:

The Disney Princess.
Image
Image
2/

The Disney Princess is the perfect archetype of easy natural inherent nobility and morality.

She is an artifact of inborn virtue, a born noble, irrespective of parentage.

With the naive careless values that come from an easy mastery of her domain
Image
Image
3/
From this metaphysical nobility (occasionally paired with political nobility) she is reduced to the lowest station, a servant, a wanderer, a cripple, an enlistee

Only for her innate nobility to reveal itself and for her to win her rightful station and an apex man with it Image
Read 18 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(