Chung-Tzu Profile picture
Sep 28, 2023 25 tweets 14 min read Read on X
(1/24) Let's look at the BTR-70. Image
(2/24) In 1971, the Gorky Auto Factory (GAZ) under chief designer Igor Mukhin developed the GAZ-50 'wheeled BMP' based on the BTR-60PB APC. It was intended to supplement the BMP-1, whose high complexity and cost precluded it ever becoming the sole Soviet IFV/APC.
Image
Image
(3/24) For various reasons (such as the 'only tracks can keep up with tracks' dogma), even though the GAZ-50 passed tests, it did not go into service. Mukhin would rework it into another APC called GAZ-4905, and it entered service as the BTR-70 in 1972.
Image
Image
(4/24) If you stare long enough at the BTR-60PB and BTR-70, you may note that the BTR-70's hull looks like it's been squashed down a bit. Indeed, this is a legacy of the GAZ-50, since they needed to compensate for the heavier turret with 73 mm 2A28 and heightened CG.
Image
Image
(5/24) The other most obvious difference between the BTR-60PB and the BTR-70 are the location of the side dismount hatches. The BTR-60PB has them in the upper hull, while the standard BTR-70 has them in the lower hull, between the wheels.
Image
Image
(6/24) The BTR-60PB's side hatches were always considered to be weakness of the vehicle, because their inconvenient location made it difficult and potentially hazardous to dismount in combat.
(7/24) The basic layout of the BTR-70 is similar to that of the BTR-60PB but there are some internal differences here as well.
Image
Image
(8/24) The BTR-70 is powered by twin ZMZ-4905 4-stroke V-8 petrol engines, developing a combined 240 hp. Each engine has its own transmission and gear boxes that drives 2 pairs of wheels (1st and 3rd, right engine; 2nd and 4th, left engine). Max speed is 80 km/h.


Image
Image
Image
Image
(9/24) This was for redundancy to improve the vehicle's survivability. The first two axles are steerable as well. The BTR-70 introduced separate brake drives for the wheels and insulated fuel tanks in the rear of the vehicle, isolated from the engine compartment.

Image
Image
Image
(10/24) Overall, the platform has pretty good cross-country performance. It is capable of crossing trenches and ditches up to 2 m wide, thanks to its long base and 8 x 8 configuration.
(11/24) As expected, the BTR-70 is fully amphibious and has a water jet that can propel it at ~10 km/h in water. It has a single lid, instead of the double lids of the BTR-60PB.

(12/24) The main armament of the BTR-70 is identical to the BRDM-2 and BTR-60PB: 14.5 mm KPVT and 7.62 mm PKT. The conical turret is identical as well.

(13/24) The BTR-70 can also carry 2 Strela-3 (9K34) MANPADS, 2 AGS-17 automatic grenade launchers, and 1 RPG-7. Image
(14/24) The BTR-70 can carry 7 infantrymen, 6 of whom sit in the passenger compartment, with another behind the commander (1). The seats can be folded up and held by straps in order to accommodate wounded on stretchers for casevac.


Image
Image
Image
Image
(15/24) Unlike on the BTR-60PB, the BTR-70's passengers sit facing outwards to the sides of the vehicle. This makes it easier for them to use the fire ports. These are meant for AKs, but you can use a Mosin, if you are so inclined.

(16/24) Armour is a meagre 8-10 mm maximum on the front hull, 6 mm elsewhere. This might stop fragments and non-AP bullets, but not much more.
Image
Image
(17/24) Experience with the BTR-70 in the Afghan War was not very positive, suffering overheating and power loss in the 'hot and high' Afghan climate, insufficient gun elevation, and the troublesome double engine. This feedback led to the BTR-80.
thesovietarmourblog.blogspot.com/2014/11/btr-80…
Image
(18/24) In general, Russia has moved on to the BTR-80 series (which includes the autocannon-armed BTR-82A). The only two BTR-70s lost that appear on are from the 9th Motor-Rifle Brigade.
warspotting.net
ukr.warspotting.net/search/?bellig…
Image
(19/24) This leaves Ukraine as the largest user of the BTR-70 today. Zhirokhov estimates that Ukraine inherited ~1,500 BTR-70s, of which 357 were exported and most put into storage, leaving only 450 in service in 2014.
fraza.com/analytics/2717…
Image
(20/24) As of 2018, Zhirokhov conservatively estimated 600-640 BTR-70s in Ukrainian service, including NHU and TrO units. This is in contrast to the 237 quoted by The Military Balance, which is one of the reasons why I personally never take any of their figures seriously.
Image
Image
(21/24) The ZSU lost at least 34 BTR-70s between 2014-15, most by the 92nd Mech. Brigade during the fighting around Ilovaisk on 27 Aug 2014 to Russian artillery. The fleet was also afflicted by poor reliability of the ZMZ-4905 engines.
Image
Image
(22/24) There have been several efforts to modernise the BTR-70, replacing the old and unreliable engines. The BTR-70M and BTR-70Di are examples of such projects, the former using the BMP's UTD-20 engine and the latter Italian Iveco diesels. They also feature BTR-80 hatches.
Image
Image
(23/24) The BTR-70M was abandoned after about 20 were made, though the BTR-70Di appears to have been more successful. It's been reported that they were to be modernised with thermal sights, satnavs, and modern radios.
mil.in.ua/uk/modernizacz…
Image
(24/24) However, the vanilla BTR-70 remained the main BTR in Ukrainian service at the start of 2022, supplemented by smaller numbers of BTR-80s. It will likely remain that way until the West supplies many more APCs. Until, then, the BTR-70 will continue to serve.
Image
Image
🫢 Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Chung-Tzu

Chung-Tzu Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ChungTzuW

Jun 22
Yuriy Kryuchkov, 'Submarines and their creators 1900–2000: Dramas of people, ships and ideas' (2010)

Image
Image
Image
Shaped charge torpedo scheme
Image
Image
Nuclear torpedo
Image
Image
Read 14 tweets
Apr 2
(1) If you have been kind enough to buy/download/borrow/acquire/pirate one of these books, I would like to take this opportunity to list any technical errors I made in them. If future editions are printed, they will be corrected, and if you notice any more feel free to tell me.
Image
Image
(2) Vol. 4 Page 4: The T-44 was not the first Soviet tank with planetary gear transmission: they originally still used friction clutches like the T-34. The T-54 was the first, and T-44s were later given them when upgraded to T-44M standard in the '60s.




Image
Image
Image
Image
(3) Vol. 4 Page 31: T-72s are not unique in this respect. All the Soviet MBTs of that generation have this layout (T-64B, upper), even the T-80U (lower). Don't ask me why they put it there (maybe no space?).

Image
Image
Image
Read 4 tweets
Mar 12
(1/24) Let's talk about the P-35 and Progress missiles. Image
(2) Let us go back to the beginning. In 8̶8̶2̶, R̶u̶r̶i̶k̶'s̶ s̶u̶c̶c̶e̶s̶s̶o̶r̶ P̶r̶i̶n̶c̶e̶ O̶l̶e̶g̶ 1954, Vladimir Chelomei's 'special design group' began work on the P-5 cruise missile. Previously, they worked on the 10Kh, the Soviet copy of the German Fi 103 aka V-1.
Image
Image
(3) Up to this point, cruise missiles had to be assembled on ramps before launch. These included the American Regulus submarine-launched strategic cruise missiles. The P-5 was similar in role, launched by submarines like the ungainly '655' (art by Hylajaponica (DA)).


Image
Image
Image
Image
Read 25 tweets
Feb 7
(1/80) Today, I'd like to talk about the Project 945 Barrakuda ('Sierra I'). Image
(2) While these subs are not involved in the war, I find the class interesting and rather neglected. There are some good English articles about them (like @CovertShores), but generally not too much about technical details.
hisutton.com/Russian%20SIER…
Image
(3) I should preface this with a caveat: I am not a sub expert. This is just stuff I've gathered over time that I wanted to share. If you see something wrong, let me know.

Most of this is based on several books.


Image
Image
Image
Image
Read 84 tweets
Jan 27
Mil Mi-24V, Southern Museum of Flight, Birmingham AL

Notice anything unusual?


Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Read 5 tweets
Jan 12
The Egyptian MiG-23MS experience

MiG-23 Flogger in the Middle East, Tom Cooper (2018)
Image
Image
The Iraqi MiG-23MS experience

Image
Image
Image
The Libyan MiG-23MS experience

Image
Image
Image
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(