Tyler Black, MD Profile picture
Sep 29 17 tweets 10 min read Twitter logo Read on Twitter
🚨🚨Vaccination Saves Lives🚨
UK/ONS Misinfo correction

Contrary to twitter claims, UK's ONS shows stark protection is evident, AT EVERY AGE. Misinfo ghouls lie.

Here's a thread!

First: All-age mortality
-34% mortality (-74% covid, -28% non-covid) if vaxxed!

/1

Image
Image
Image
We're going to break this down by ages (for "it's just old people" ageist awful ghouls") in a second, but let's orient:

On the left, big:
All-cause mortality (Vax: -34%)

On the top right:
COVID mortality (Vax: -74%)

On the bottom right:
Non-COVID mortality (Vax: -28%)

/2

Image
Image
Image
In the oldest age group, 90+, we see benefit of -12.5% mortality to being vaccinated. For COVID mortality, it's -60% and for non-COVID mortality it's -4%

(likely healthy vaccine effect w/early non-covid benefit, so more likely negligable non-COVID mortality benefit)

/3

Image
Image
Image
Ages 80-89: -29% mortality benefit to being vaccinated.

For COVID mortality, it's -73%
For non-COVID mortality it's -21%

("healthy vax fx" NOT likely outside of first few months, COVID death undercount is a more likely explanation as it matches covid death wave)

/4

Image
Image
Image
Ages 70-79: -43% mortality benefit to being vaccinated.

For COVID mortality, it's -80%
For non-COVID mortality it's -37%

my guess as to the "blip" of increased mortality in 2022 is breakthrough serious infection in previously protected people, perhaps delayed vax rollout?

/5

Image
Image
Image
Ages 60-69: -45% mortality benefit to being vaccinated.

For COVID mortality, it's -84%
For non-COVID mortality it's -39%

Just absolutely stark, likely combination of healthy vax fx + undercount COVID + med complications of covid infection.

/6

Image
Image
Image
Ages 50-59: -42% mortality benefit to being vaccinated.

For COVID mortality, it's -85%
For non-COVID mortality it's -36%

Absolutely obvious and incredible mortality protection by being vaccinated.

/7

Image
Image
Image
Now interestingly, below 50, we have strong evidence an inverse to "Healthy vax effect"- under 50, vaccines were first offered to the very sick.

(to illustrate: non-COVID mortality for 90+y with likely "healthy vax fx", for 40-49y with "unhealthy vax fx")

Lets press on!

/7
Image
Image
Ages 40-49: -27% mortality benefit to being vaccinated.

For COVID mortality, it's -81%
For non-COVID mortality it's -19%

And this is **battling** a likely "unhealthy vaccine effect" early on. Note at this young age, NO increased non-covid mortality even by may 2023!

/8

Image
Image
Image
Ages 18-39: -13% mortality benefit to being vaccinated.

For COVID mortality, it's -75%
For non-COVID mortality it's -7% (with a HUGE headwind of early "unhealthy vax effect")

Unequivocally: even for the very young, COVID vaccination prevented death and did NOT cause death.

/9

Image
Image
Image
Quick data note - for COVID deaths at this young age group, we are dealing with very few covid deaths in 2022 onwards. However, given the overall mortality benefit, no evidence of non-covid mortality harm, the risk-benefit analysis clearly supports vaccinating this group.

/10
So how do the misinfo ghouls lie?

1) cherrypicking extremes
We are usually dealing with 95% error, so if we chop data into 2 sexes, 9 vaccination states, & 7 age groups, we are making 126 comparisons per month. To adjust, error would have to be 99.96%!

/11
2) ignoring the very likely "unhealthy vax effect"

The ghouls LOVE to show a subset where 18-39 year olds are more likely to die:

However, as i've demonstrated, the "Healthy vaccine effect" INVERTS at age 50, meaning that in this young group, likely a very strong effect.

/12 Image
Almost certainly, each subsequent booster, especially without mandates, will be taken by the people with the greatest health problems in the 18-39 age group.

After the winter campaign for 4th boosters in the UK, only 9% of 18-39 year olds received a vaccine!

/13 Image
3) COVID ghouls love to lie about the data. Lies, unfortunately, can be hidden behind clever use of statistics or ignoring biases.

/14
CONCLUSION:

ONS UK data clearly shows that for both NON-COVID and COVID deaths, mortality benefit of vaccination exceeds mortality risk, and vaccination saves lives.

(note: non-covid benefit mostly derived from 2021-mid 2022, but still slightly beneficial 2022-2023)

/15 Image
SOURCES:

All of this data comes from the ONS:



And the ONS writes this up very nicely:
ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulati…
ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulati…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Tyler Black, MD

Tyler Black, MD Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @tylerblack32

Sep 28
Simple graphs to counter COVID denialism & revisionism

1) American Deaths '99-'23 (raw)

Sometimes simple graphs tell a powerful story. When we talk about the United States having > 1 million excess deaths due to the pandemic, this is the visualization of what that looks like. Image
2) Age-Standardized Mortality, 1999-2023

The gold standard in mortality is "age-standardized mortality", which ensures that we are controlling for population and age shifts in the US.

Again, COVID a stark shift unlike any "flu" season previous.

(model fit 2014+ is plotted) Image
3) Excess Mortality 2014-2023

Using a 5-year seasonal model, we can calculate excess mortality. The pandemic DWARFS previous seasonal/flu shifts. >1,000,000 Excess American Deaths during the pandemic, and in December 2020 (before vaccines), 40% higher-than-expected mortality! Image
Read 7 tweets
Sep 7
Suicide Prevention
🚨Schools🚨

Lets make schools safer! #WorldSuicidePreventionDay

1) School can be exciting, stressful, & terrifying. Listen to kids if are distressed!

2) Suicide rates, and suicidal visits to the ER are directly correlated to school days (+50-+100%)

/1
Image
Image
3) When we listen to kids, they tell us they feel the pressure! Surveys of kids reporting severe stress caused by school burdens by the American Psychological Association range from 40% to 80%!

A 2019 pew survey shared some of the top pressures.

/2 Image
4) Significant academic stress is strongly correlated with a number of negative outcomes, like poor sleep quality, substance use, poor academic performance, mental health diagnoses.



/3tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.10…
Read 13 tweets
Aug 25
Thank you so much to @mehdirhasan for this incredible deep dive into the circumstances that we faced in 2020, the decisions that we made with respect to schools, and the impact that covid has had on children both the virus itself as well as our response to it.

/1
I worked closely with production team as they asked me about the numbers that I've posted and they worked so hard to get it right.

Hours of discussions and data analysis went into informing the @MehdiHasanShow team as best I could.

/2
Example: in learning loss data we have so much variation by district and state that rather than making a bold claim we simply stated what is undeniably true: there was a weak relationship between learning loss and school modality, & tying it directly to school closures hard.

/3
Read 18 tweets
Aug 14
VAERS database deaths:
Trumped by political partisanship

A Twitter Mini-Paper

VAERS is a database storing "side effect" reports (note: VAERS can never show cause, only potential link). Given the subjective nature of entry, I wonder, does political bias affect VAERS?

/1 Image
Why do I say that VAERS is subjective in it's entry? For a number of reasons:

a) entry into VAERS is requested but voluntary when someone suspects a vaccine-induced event
b) no standard exists for VAERS entries
c) can be a professional or layperson
d) events are NOT verified

/2
Each of these could be subject to political bias - right wing politicians have promoted "your choice about vaccination" principles and anti-vaccination ideology and left-wing politicians have "you should/must get vaccinated" principles and pro-vaccination ideology.

/3
Read 22 tweets
Aug 13
Imagine a database, BAERS: Breakkie Adverse Eating Reaction System. Whenever you feel like it, you can log when you notice someone gets injured, sick, or dies after eating breakfast.

Heart attack after toast? BAERS.
Stomach ache after cereal? BAERS.

That's what VAERS is.

/1
Millions of people have breakfast daily, so we would expect events ranging from indigestion, stomach pain (most common) to heart attacks & even to deaths.

Some group of anti-breakfasters would claim at some point that breakfast is causing those.

Thats who antivaxxers are.

/2
Every now & then, the anti-breakfasters would share some person who hates breakfast, Deli Bigfeast, or KFCjr, who would take snippets of BAERS & show that BREAKFAST CAUSES MYOCARDITIS due to the # of BAERS reports on it.

That's who the grifters are, and its very lucrative!

/3
Read 5 tweets
Aug 6
This study that's going around is a fantastic example of an awful meta-analysis that adds no new data but makes a surprising and unfounded claim.

/1 Image
There are technical reasons that this study has no superiority for confounding vs other studies, despite the authors claims, but I'm not going to get into that. I'm going to get into the logic.

/2
There are 3 studies included, one from Italy, one from England, and one from Florida (the infamous and extremely biased Ladapo study).

Due to the metaanalytic method, ladapos study was weighted 42%, Italian 40%, and England 17%.

/3
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(