Read on Twitter
Quite possibly the single worst “research” methodology I’ve ever seen. The fact that you hustlers are passing off and repeating corrupt data sets as peer reviewed ‘science’ makes you dangerous idiots.
https://twitter.com/datepsych/status/1706804066880205298
1. Who devised the research method?
2. What does the research look for?
3. Does the method test for purpose?
4. Who is performing the research?
5. Who/What is the subject?
6. Control group, correlates, qualitative, quantitative?
7. Who reviewed the research?
8. Who funded the project?
9. Who published the research?
10. What was the abstract and how did it compare to the conclusion?
Anyone who is unable or unwilling to explain these basics research protocols is selling you something.
2. What does the research look for?
3. Does the method test for purpose?
4. Who is performing the research?
5. Who/What is the subject?
6. Control group, correlates, qualitative, quantitative?
7. Who reviewed the research?
8. Who funded the project?
9. Who published the research?
10. What was the abstract and how did it compare to the conclusion?
Anyone who is unable or unwilling to explain these basics research protocols is selling you something.
This is first year stuff for a Psych major. 
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
