manasataramgini Profile picture
Oct 1 5 tweets 2 min read Twitter logo Read on Twitter
It is v.clear that the neocons, a limb of the deep state with tangled connections that underlie "neo-Occidental civilization", have decided to prop her up. The MSM has been a domain of the neocons since the rise of guchchaka & mahAduShTa-vakrAs. That's what we are seeing here.
They (at least a subset) originally put their lot with anugAmin. However, anugAmin has a bit of a mind of his own & also the instinct to gauge what his base might want. Hence, he did not go their way. Also the base he is trying to tap into knows that nAri~Nga is a better choice,
so why go for some1 secondhand. So anugAmin started declining. OTH viveka is clearly best of the also-rans by a large margin. However, he has several disadvantages: 1. He looks alien to the modal mahAmlechCa. 2. Despite his many genuflections & assimilation of Judaeo-Christianity
he is still a heathen. 3. He opposes the primary neo-con+para-neocon (i.e., other deepstate operatives, e.g., soranAma mahAduShTa -- he started with the hastin-s under rAjaka the sailUSha from kapilAraNya) project of never-ending wars like that in dAnu-apara.
4. He is anti-Galtonism in a fundamental rather than superficial sense. 5. He is a threat to the bureaucracy. Hence, every attempt will be made to suppress him. It seems the primary reason for the neocons propping up the utterly useless paTTini is to try to balance him out.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with manasataramgini

manasataramgini Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @blog_supplement

Oct 2
@JoraShankara @Sapratha 2. Harappan being Dravidian is a rather unfounded claim; hence, I think Steve Bonta is correct in dispelling rather strongly the idea that it was Dravidian -- he is a dravidianist himself
3. I think he has made a real contribution to understanding the Harappan script in defining
@JoraShankara @Sapratha the fields P,M,C, T and their sub-structure. 4. I also think he may have found something meaningful in his analysis of the so-called "M" field.
I find his readings more "believable" than another recent IA interpretation which was posted by a person called yaj~nadeva. However,
@JoraShankara @Sapratha that doesn't mean I believe them or am convinced by them. Could there be something to his findings?
1. If the Southern Arc theory of the Harvard lab has something to it & Harappans are related to the Southern Arc then there could be a remote similarity between the S.arc languages
Read 8 tweets
Sep 28
A “Kafiristani” incantation recorded via Morgenstierne: *imro*! delect machi mrhor o! o *bagiShT* o!
imro of the gods (delect ~ devaloka or godly realm) and of mortals the lord o! (c.f. devAnAm uta yo martyAnAM yajiShThaH); o the god baghiShT o!
The o in the incantation is
likely a denasalized OM cognate. The deity imro is the cognate of yamo rajan; The deity baghiShT seems to be a superlative formation from the same root as the I-Ir deity bhaga, who once enjoyed a popular Iranic cult. Comes in names like bhagadatta; baghdAd on both sides of the
divide. The position of the god yama is peculiar in early I-Ir tradition. The RV tradition is ambivalent towards him. He is presented as the might king and the son of the god vivasvat. While in some references, he is a god (e.g., ekaM sad viprA…). In others, he is contrasted
Read 8 tweets
Sep 24
Not central to the map but more related to below discussion. If we for a moment just include everything, i.e., don't make an attempt a priori to distinguish interpolations from the core Mbh (leave aside the "critical"= Pune edition) we have following counts for "distant" peoples
Image
of these the word mlechCha is probably of Harappan provenance & was transferred to Old IA in the late Vedic age. It is 1st attested in the shatapatha brAhmaNa of shuklayajurveda 3.2.1.24. There it is stated that the language of the mlechCha is unintelligible & a v1 is asked not
to speak it as it is the tongue of the asura-s. It could have been originally a group of people in the Harappan domain that more generally acquired the sense of a foreign people by the Mbh. The niShAda ruler nala nAishAda is a historical hero in the Mbh. He is already mentioned
Read 8 tweets
Sep 23
Seeing related posts too, but those who have followed the k'stan issue for a while know that it is not a purely (probably not even primarily) TSPian project. It is a mahAmlechCha deepstate project contracted out in main to its pa~nchanetraka subsidiaries like laNDapura& karNATa.
The deeper roots go back to 1857 CE when an H coalition under marahaTTa leadership with the Mogol remnants made one last attempt to rid the subcontinent of Abrahamoanglo dominance gained via the Anglo-marahaTTa & sikh wars. It was part of the larger global series of events for
Abrahamoanglo world conquest. The Crimean war against the rUs, featuring the well-known mlechCha-marUnmattAbhisaMdhi, the opium wars on the Ching, the Boer war, the world wars 1&2 were all part of the same system of their quest for world dominance. Challenges by Germany & Japan
Read 8 tweets
Sep 19
@Anand_Venkatram @Sapratha by the state. However what is of interest to me is the so-called muskrat: you are right that it is a wrong translation. sutra goes thus: शाल्मली विदारी धान्य सिद्धो मूल वत्सनाभ.सम्युक्तश् छुच्छुन्दरी शोणित प्रलेपेन दिग्धो बाणो यं विध्यति स विद्धो.अन्यान् दश पुरुषान् दशति ते दष्टा
@Anand_Venkatram @Sapratha दश.अन्यान् दशन्ति पुरुषान् ||
word is ChuChundarI which should be correctly translated as shrew. Why it is of interest to me is that kauTilya was ahead of his times & probably the first one to record a shrew toxin. To date the Haitian solenodon the European water shrew, the
@Anand_Venkatram @Sapratha Mediterranean shrew, the American short-tailed shrew,&the East Asian shrew have been shown to be venomous. The American shrew's toxin is related to a toxin of the gila monster & the East Asian shrew's main toxin is related to a snail toxin. No one has studied the toxicity of the
Read 5 tweets
Sep 12
As part of our study of the vulgar register of Late Old IA we found the Skt cognates & attempted identification based on that & a lexicographic search. We paste that below:
devAnAmpiye piyadasi lAja hevam ahA saDuvIsati-vasa-abhisitena me imAni jAtAni avadhiyAni kaTAni seyathA
suke sAlikA alune chakacAke haMse nandImukhe
The beloved of the gods, king priyadarshin spoke thus: [having been] annointed for 26 years the following beings were declared unkillable by me, namely (seyathA= tadyathA):
suke: shuka: parrot
sAlikA: shArikA: mynah
aluna: aruNa: spotted eagle
chakacAke: chakravAka: Brahmany goose
haMsa: haMsa: common goose
nandImukha: nandimukha: comb duck
gelATa: gairATa: hill mynah
jatUka: jatUkA: bat
amba-kapIlikA: ambA-pippIlikA: queen ant
daLI: dauleya/Duli: terrapin
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(