In a 2018 paper, Nobel Prize Winner Drew Weissman warned about the potential risks of mRNA vaccines, including the development of autoimmunity and "blood coagulation and pathological thrombus formation".
Both the Pfizer and Moderna randomized controlled trials showed signals of coagulation disorders--blood clots--resulting from the COVID-19 vaccine.
Why are we not talking about these potential risks of mRNA vaccines more?
I analyzed public databases and media reporting on violent confrontations with ICE over the past year.
Just 9 counties accounted for TWO-THIRDS of violent confrontations with ICE in America.
This is twice all violent confrontations in the remaining 3,134 counties COMBINED.
A violent confrontation in these 9 counties was 590 TIMES more likely than any of these other 3,134 counties.
590 times.
I plotted these 9 counties, and I found that all 9 counties are sanctuary jurisdictions run by Democrat politicians that resist immigration law enforcement.
These violent confrontations are RARE in states and cities where local officials cooperate with law enforcement.
For the above figure, I excluded all counties with 3 or fewer incidents to highlight the counties with the highest concentration of violent confrontations.
For transparency, here is the full figure, which includes the remaining 65 of 175 violent confrontation spread elsewhere.
The major cities in these top 9 counties are well-known:
Chicago is at the top, with Brandon Johnson as mayor.
Then, in order:
Los Angeles (Karen Bass)
Minneapolis (Jacob Frey)
New York City (Zohran Mamdani)
Portland (Karen Wilson)
States without voter ID requirements are 16x more likely to offer welfare benefits to illegal immigrants than states requiring ID (67% vs 4%, p<0.0001).
Dems are importing and paying illegals for votes.
Details👇
Just one state out of 27 with effective voter ID provides welfare to illegal immigrants. Rhode Island.
Specifically, healthcare to children.
That's the 4%.
16 of 24 states without effective voter ID provide welfare to illegal immigrants.
That's the 67%.
The data are highly statistically significant across most categories.
Christopher Caldwell in his Age of Entitlement (2020) offers the best analysis that I have seen for why the universities are now all left-wing. It's not that left-wing ideas have "won". It's that universities (and govt institutions) have no choice, LEGALLY. Here's his argument:
The civil rights revolution created a second constitutional order.
This order, though its stated intention is equality, gradually displaced the older liberal order of procedural neutrality.
Federally funded institutions MUST pursue identity politics.
Over time, civil rights compliance obligations (Title VI, Title IX, affirmative action enforcement, diversity mandates, DEI bureaucracies, etc.) forced every major institution that takes federal funds--including universities--into a permanent left-coded institutional culture.
The modern Western political ideologies LIBERALISM, PROGRESSIVISM, and MARXISM should be understood as fundamentalist secularized denominations of Protestant Christianity.
All three descend from the same post-Reformation religious/moral structure:
PROTESTANTISM's faith alone became moral agency.
Inner conscience guided by God became secular trust in Reason, Science, or Justice.
Salvation became Progress.
Priesthood of all believers became moral equality.
Without God though, moral worth became performance to others.
Notably, all three ideologies inherit the DISTINCTIVE Protestant anthropology: a) the conviction that the individual conscience is the supreme authority, b) the suspicion that hierarchy is inherently corrupt, and c) a belief in history as a story of redemption from bondage.