Sergej Sumlenny, LL.M Profile picture
Oct 5, 2023 10 tweets 4 min read Read on X
Scholz knows the art of political stalemate perfectly. He blocks delivery of #Taurus missiles because he is not afraid of any pressure from ruling coalition partners. Let me explain it in a short THREAD):
1) Scholz' party SPD is an unpopular party. It has only 17,2% support /1 Image
2) Sounds like Scholz could be forced by his coalition partners into a right direction? No chance! Both coalition partners suffer a lot too. All together SPD, Greens and the Liberals get 38% of votes, far below the needed 50%. Well, how can Greens and Liberals pressure Scholz? /2 Image
3) They coalition leaders have personal popularity, but it does not transform into votes for their parties;
4) The only way to pressure Scholz is to threat him with impeachment. But the German Basic Law (Constitution) is very tricky here. Impeachment is only possible when... /3 Image
4.1) ...the parliament already has another candidate for the Chancellor position. This is called "a constructive trust voting". So before removing Scholz, 50% of deputies must agree who will be the next chancellor. Now think that the current parliament looks like this: /4 Image
5) This means, to get 50% support for the new chancellor (and without naming him or her as a candidate, you cannot remove the acting one), you need to have an agreement either between Greens, Liberals, and SPD, or Greens, Liberals, and CDU (as Left and AfD are out of question) /5 Image
6) This makes everything very easy for Scholz. In both scenarios, neither Liberals, nor Greens install their candidacy. Only CDU/CSU or SPD. From the CDU it can be only Friedrich Merz, he made many faux pas, and has terrible reputation not only among Greens, worse than Scholz /6
7) Another option: someone from the SPD steps forward and offers them as a kingslayer. It could be only Pistorius (the most popular SPD politician), but this is just impossible. He would burn himself the very millisecond he decides for that, and will not get votes of the SPD. /7 Image
7.1) The SPD also will not vote for such "traitor", and the CDU will not vote for the SPD candidate, so the Greens and the Liberals will remain with their 30% of votes plus the kingslayer's vote :)
8) Scholz knows it well and he plays the coalition, who also has their interest /8
9) The interest of enjoying well-paid and secure jobs with very low responsibility, as we know: it's Scholz' fault, and they can do nothing about it. /END
10) And yes, new elections would just bring the far-right and partly neo-Nazi, totally pro-Russian AfD party into the parliament as the SECOND LARGEST party with 21% of votes - as much as the current ruling Greens and Liberals COMBINED.
Once again: Scholz knows his staff. Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Sergej Sumlenny, LL.M

Sergej Sumlenny, LL.M Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @sumlenny

Aug 29
I see many people post their wishful thinking ideas about NATO supremacy in a future war against russia. They mention air dominance, technological dominance, and other myths. In this thread, I explain why they are wrong. /1
(And plz donate for 🇺🇦 drones: )paypal.com/donate?campaig…
First, many people believe, drones are a weapon of weak/poor nations. Like terrorism is. It is not true. Drones are new machine guns, creating incredible firepower potential for lowest level units. Approaching a drone battalion like approaching a machine gun team having rifles./2
Second: many believe, air dominance of the West solves drones problem. It does not. No NATO country has enough air force (and ammo!) to evaporate thousands of miles of a frontline amid at least minimal enemy air defense. “But we won the Gulf war!” - yes, 35 years ago. /3
Read 8 tweets
Aug 10
As a person who was born and socialised in russia, I tell you what Putin and russia think about having a Putin-Trump meeting in Alaska.
It means Putin goes to... russia. Let me explain why - in this thread.
First, you need to know that the "Alaska myth" is essential for russia /1
In my school in a town close to Moscow, I was taught in geography class in 1990s, that russia has never sold Alaska to the U.S., but leased it for 100 years. That the U.S. have later forged the contract and broken the original one. That Alaska is russian. /2
In 1991 already, russian band "Lyube" has composed a chauvinist song "Don't be silly America" with a call "give us back Alaska, our native russian land". "Lyube" was one of putin's favourite bands. Note how they sing in military uniforms from the WW2, a common style in 2020s. /2
Read 10 tweets
Jun 1
Tu-95 strategic bombers, destroyed en mass today by Ukraine's FPV drones, are not only a backbone of russia's aviation. Tu-95 was designed in 1950s, with its NK-12 engines created by a Nazi SS colonel Ferdinand Brandner, a POW in the USSR. It is a flying diesel punk Nazi crap ⬇️ Image
Brandner was a Nazi engine designer, taken by the Soviets. He started to work for another genocidal regime, and has created the NK-12 engine, until today the largest turboprop engine. After his release in 1955, Brandner worked for antisemitic Egypt and for communist China. ⬇️
Tu-95 remains the only reliable plane for the russians, as it can carry a necessary payload of multiple cruise missiles (as many missiles fail by start, and 70-80% get shot down by Ukrainian AirDefense, russia depends on massive launches, so Tu-160 or Tu-22M cannot do this job)⬇️
Read 4 tweets
May 26
A brilliant Ukrainian scholar Valery Pekar nails it: as @realDonaldTrump says, #Putin went crazy, smth happened to him, he started killing people, this marks a core Western delusion about russia: "they are organically democratic and good, the current war is just a deviation". ⬇️
Too many Western decision takers, thinkers, multiplicators believe that russia is basically a democratic culture with great culture, and any terror phase is a sort of a "mental disease", a deviation which can be healed (for instance, by removing Putin and installing Navalny).⬇️
In reality, the opposite is true: being a genocidal empire is a natural, healthy condition for russia. The concept of russia was created in the 1700s exactly as a borderless, perpetually expanding body, built on terror. It can mimic democratic institutions but never adopts them⬇️
Read 5 tweets
Apr 15
THREAD What we witness now from the White House, is a clear smearing campaign aimed not only at @ZelenskyyUa but on Ukraine at whole. Zelensky is being used as a target, but with a goal to weaken Ukraine in whole, and to strengthen Moscow. Let me explain: 👇 Image
President @ZelenskyyUa was verbally attacked by President Trump many times, with the following four main accusation lines:
a) Zelensky is ungrateful
b) Zelensky is corrupt
c) Zelensky is a dictator
d) Zelensky has started the war / is interested in war.
Nothing is true. 2/x👇
@ZelenskyyUa President Zelensky has thanked the U.S. people dozens of times for the help provided. "Corruption" is a typical russian lie, used also by russia-friendly voices, who claimed with no proves that Ukraine-delivered arms were "stolen". But let us address other accusations 3/x👇 Image
Image
Image
Read 9 tweets
Apr 14
Some thoughts on recent russian missile attacks on Ukrainian cities
1) russia is facing a huge and growing problem with its offensive slowing down, unsustainably high losses, and even some Ukrainian counter-offensive in Pokrovsk region;
2) russia uses two tactics to counter it:👇
3) First, russia starts "negotiations". The goal is to slow Ukraine down, to limit Ukrainian striking freedom (ban Ukrainian strikes on the Black Sea navy, on russian oil refineries etc.), while accumulating military power;
4) Second, russia increases PsyOps against Ukraine. 👇
4.1) russia's missile strikes on Ukraine's cities are demonstratively brutal: ballistic missiles with cluster munition warheads aiming civilians' gatherings, incl. children playgrounds;
4.2) at the same time, russia spreads false info that they have targeted military personnel👇
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(