In case anyone still believes that changing the Covid testing policy in hospitals back in April hasn’t really affected the hospitalisation data, this chart is just for you.
Please take a good look at it.
It tells a very interesting story…
You can quite clearly see the point where Covid hospitalisations decouple from the PCR positivity rate…
…and it’s no coincidence that it falls on EXACTLY 1 April 2023.
1 April is the date that Covid testing policy in hospitals changed.
Since that date, there has been no routine Covid testing in hospitals, even for those with Covid symptoms.
Since 1 April, PCR tests have only been given to those where having a Covid diagnosis would change their prescribed clinical treatment plan.
Even clinically vulnerable patients eligible for anti-viral treatment are only given an LFT test.
And yet, despite there now being no routine Covid testing for hospital admissions, we’ve still seen a rapid increase in Covid hospitalisations over the last 3 months.
It’s not just increased a bit; it’s QUADRUPLED!
When we look back a bit further, the data appears more reassuring as the recent hospitalisation figures are nowhere near the peaks we used to get.
But remember, prior to 1 April, every single hospital admission would be routinely tested for Covid.
It’s like comparing 🍎 & 🍐!
If there hadn’t been the change in testing policy, perhaps that trough in July would be at the same baseline as other recent dips?
If you extrapolate a 4x increase on top of that, the numbers start to look extremely worrying.
But, of course,without testing, we can’t be sure. 🤷🏻♀️
Either way, this 4-fold increase in Covid positive hospital admissions, despite there being *no* routine testing, is quite something.
But what’s even *more* remarkable is that there’s not even been any noticeable increase in PCR testing volumes (grey bars on chart below).
👇🏻
The thing which has shot up massively is the % of PCR tests which give a positive result.
It’s just peaked at 16.9%.
With the same number of tests but a big increase in positivity rate, that tells us we’re almost certainly missing a LOT of Covid hospital cases in those figures.
Rumour has it that some hospitals have even been told they’re not *allowed* to test patients for Covid.
1) the data and the fact that we’re not seeing the full picture here.
But more importantly:
2) the real-world impact of all those hospital patients who are infected with Covid but haven’t been tested for it.
The really tragic thing is that it’s no longer deemed necessary to test to identify Covid positive patients because there are not really any infection controls for Covid anymore.
There are no isolation wards for Covid patients.
They don’t test them. They don’t isolate them.
If you have to be admitted to hospital, it’s quite possible there will be someone on your ward with Covid.
They may not even know it themselves as there’s hardly any testing anymore…
Even if there’s not someone on your ward with Covid, maybe there is on the ward next door.
And then you’ve got doctors and nurses who are busily doing their jobs, moving from ward to ward, patient to patient, seeing dozens of sick patients a day… day in, day out…
…but those doctors and nurses who have been attending to all those sick patients won’t be wearing a face mask.
Masks are no longer required in the vast majority of hospitals.
Apparently it’s more important to see doctor’s smiles 😁 than to prevent the spread of infection.
It’s little wonder that Covid is spreading like wildfire through hospitals.
Part of the reason it spreads so easily is that people are highly contagious just before the onset of any symptoms.
In fact, nearly 60% of all Covid infections are from people with NO symptoms (yet).
Without routine testing, these asymptomatic cases will of course go undetected.
But it’s even worse than that.
They’re not even protecting against SYMPTOMATIC transmission!
Healthcare workers who have Covid symptoms and/or test positive are told they should still come to work.
Surely the one place that people should be afforded a higher level of infection control is in hospitals…
…a place where people go when they are sicker, weaker and more vulnerable than they would usually be.
Isn’t that the very essence of the Hippocratic Oath?
Numerous studies tell us that clinical outcomes from hospital-acquired Covid infections are pretty dire, far worse than those who remained infection free.
“1 in 5 people who caught Covid in hospital, died with it.”
This week, the Covid Inquiry has been hearing evidence from doctors saying they didn’t feel adequately protected during the early stages of the pandemic.
But Covid is not over.
This is still happening in hospitals TODAY.
And there are even LESS mitigations now than back then.
Everyone should have the right to access safe healthcare.
Hospitals must be made safe again.
Below is a Open Letter written by the distinguished team of experts at the John Snow Project which you can use to help advocate for better infection controls in your local hospital 👇🏻
This is not a particularly new idea; it’s been discussed in scientific circles for years already.
Back in early 2023, the World Health Network (@TheWHN) published this article which summarised the latest research on Covid’s impact on the immune system.
The guidance is clear that those self-isolating at home should NOT wait for symptoms before taking precautions.
For the ENTIRE 42-day quarantine, they should:
▪️Avoid contact with other household members
▪️Remain in a separate room
▪️If contact is unavoidable, wear a respirator
🚨Clinically Vulnerable Families (@cv_cev) have issued a press release calling for the government to immediately publish the full operational & clinical arrangements for passengers & close contacts linked to the MV Hondius outbreak.
I’ve just listened to the health update from the US Nebraska Health Officials 🇺🇸
A few points of interest:
1/ in addition to the US passenger who tested positive & the one showing symptoms, it seems there is ANOTHER passenger who may have tested positive.
2/ Passengers currently in the Nebraska quarantine unit will spend a few days there being assessed.
If they remain symptom free & have support available at home to isolate safely, they’ll have the choice to complete the 42-day isolation either at home or in the quarantine unit.
3/ When asked about the US passengers who left the ship in St Helena on 24 Apr (at the same time at the Dutch woman who was symptomatic & sadly died on 26 Apr), they confirmed that these passengers have all been traced & are being monitored - but seems they’re NOT self-isolating.
Following my thread yesterday which criticised aspects of the WHO’s strategy, I’m pleased to see they’ve done a 180° turn in the updated guidance published today:
…and ALL high-risk contacts will now be required to ISOLATE in a designated facility or at home (depending on each country’s capabilities) for 42 days from last known exposure…
…and for the MV Hondius passengers & crew, the last day of exposure is the date of disembarkation.
So for the passengers & crew leaving the ship today, the clock for their 42 days in isolation starts ticking TODAY…
…and their isolation & monitoring will end on 21 June.
Following the WHO press briefing, I wanted to compile a thread with the key points.
1/ ISOLATION OF PASSENGERS
Concerningly, it seems the WHO are NOT recommending to isolate cruise ship passengers (even high-risk contacts) UNLESS they develop symptoms.
Just to quickly recap, it has been confirmed that the passengers & crew (including the 30 who disembarked on 24 April in St Helena) come from a total of 28 different countries.
The full breakdown of countries for both passengers 🟥 & crew 🟦 is detailed below ⬇️
When the 146 people remaining on the ship are repatriated to their home countries, each country will adopt their own local protocols.