Thread by @S_Coughlin_DC

@real_sensible 2) Any analysis that doesn't recognize that the dialectical plane is more important than the blast zone it creates is an active measure. Those executing the active measure, analysis based solely on the bast zone, don't have to know that is their designated role.

@real_sensible 3) Almost every "Conservative" / "GOP" / "Save America" groups that's funded to advance "the cause" declares that the situation is "SO SEVERE" in the close battle, that they don't have time to address the larger issues.

@real_sensible 4) When establishing such conditions, they then put limits on the extent of the response that strictly limit it to the immediate issue, which is, in practical terms, almost always the current blast zone, launched by the dialectical airplane, i.e., the actual firing system.

@real_sensible 5) Once the firing system - the dialectical aircraft - sees its target decisively engaged in the current dialectical event, it will then launch the next dialectical bomb so that it can impact when the current engagement serves its purpose.

@real_sensible 6) The target group that executes the "close battle" under the enforced guidelines constraining battlefield awareness to only close battle w/o reference to the main attack, will only be released from the current battle to fight the next when it's been prepped.

@real_sensible 7) Every dialectical blast zone, which becomes the sole basis on which engagement in that zone is to occur, was created by the firing system composed of a central narrative with binaries - a positive and a negative pole. The narratives that will define the terms of engagement -

@real_sensible 8) - includes the narratives by which both sides will fight the battle, including everything that comes out of your mouth. The only (ONLY ONLY ONLY) way to win the fight is to shoot down the dialectical fighter-bomber. Minimally - remember this:

@real_sensible 9) When your rules of engagement ALWAYS have you responding to attacks while in the blast zone, YOU ARE FIXED in the blast zone - always responding to attacks at times of places (and designed narratives) of the other sides choosing. Keeping FIXED in the blast zone - the "circle."

@real_sensible 10) Hence, knowingly or not, when "conservative" / GOP / "Save America" orgs demand that you always only fight the immediate attack (the blase zone of the dialectical bomb) (b/c we don't have time to . . .), they become the agent that fixes you in the blast zone, and

@real_sensible 11) and conditions you for the next. Hence, they become the agent - the DEFEAT MECHANISM - that fixes you in the target for destruction - and you will be destroyed as long as you're fixed. They are what they do.

@real_sensible 12) Those "friendly" orgs that only operate in the blast zone may or may not be aware of their role. But you cannot let that be a consideration in recognizing that so long as you allow them to play that role, your destruction through negating dialectical attacks is assured.

@real_sensible 13) Everything that keeps you in the blast zone - actually the engagement area (EA) - operates to seek your destruction. Getting out of the EA always takes precedence over determining why your "leader" fixes you.

@real_sensible 14) But those "conservative" /GOPe / "save America" groups that do long-term strategerie / ops planning by doing such things as whiteboarding the language they plan to use in what will become a future dialectical attack are actually engaged in weaponizing the dialectical attack

@real_sensible 15) designed to place you, then keep you, in the blast zone of the bomb blast (EA) - which will be launched by the dialectical fighter they helped weaponize by providing - then enforcing - your narrative responses & insisting that "we don't have time" to address the larger cause.

@real_sensible 16) It's at this point where consideration needs to be given to the nature of dialectical attacks - which executes as the archetype (doctrinal template) level of understanding of which Marxism, the Lodge, and Hermetic reflect subroutine manifestations of the "Platonic Nightmare."

@real_sensible 17) While we can certainly state that Marxism is completely dialectical in form and in its modes of attack, it's shocking how those "fighting the red scourge" refuse - dogmatically & possibly as a matter of doctrine - to meet the threat on that battlefield - thus assuring defeat.

@real_sensible 18) To disagree w this is to be wrong. To engage a threat on assumptions that are false b/c they are wrong is to be defeated by that threat. To institutionalize that response is to participate in the manufacturing of your defeat, in this instance, the destruction of America.

@real_sensible 19) One either understands this or one doesn't. If you're not sure, you don't. So, from the blast zone of the dialectical attack - which is a preplanned point of attack by those planning it -

@real_sensible 20) Let's focus on the bomb blast itself -

@real_sensible 21) And position itself alongside its EA (engagement area) footprint.

@real_sensible 22) The EA footprint is designed so that you perceive the engagement as a 2-dimensional struggle between you and the opposing side (GOP v Dems / Fox v MSNBC) when in fact, the only objective of the fight is to fix you in the EA.

@real_sensible 23) But in reality, while fixing you in the narrative = focusing on the completely scripted engagement that fixes you in the blast zone, the actual attack is 3-dimensional, it operates on a trajectory, to a target - the target audience - you.

@real_sensible 24) A prepackaged narrative is central to dialectical attacks, with scripting for both sides built into the attk matrix. If you engage the narr, you lose even if you win that round - esp. if you win by "jujitsuing them at their own game" b/c you are now invested in their narr.

@real_sensible 25) Jumping ahead, once the two binaries cycle the central narrative, you become contained in the narrative by participation. The node in the binary that reflects your part of the script also serves as the control in a controlled op regime (to fix you in the circle/BZ/EA).

@real_sensible 26) So long as the narrative scripted for you fixes you, those creating/sustaining/enforcing it seek your destruction EVEN IF they themselves lack the discernment to recognize their role - and hence cannot be a consideration in how you respond.

@real_sensible 27) Hence, those who have truly transitioned to a dialectical frame to interpret events meet with a horrific epiphany that everything they see is framed by forced interpretations that mask the dialectical nature of events/activities designed to deracinate them out of existence -

@real_sensible 28) - by both sides of the narr - equally invested - by imposing narrs that fix you in the k*ll zone. But it also (powerfully) suggests that "RINO" severely underestimates the role of the GOPe - esp when operating as a node in the binary that weaponizes narrs to negate you.

@real_sensible 28) All of this can be explained by the simple visualization of a fighter jet dropping pre-planned dialectical bombs designed to fix you in the EA/bomb blast so you can be systematically negated.

@real_sensible 29) (actually 30) These are individual lines of attack are INTERSECTIONAL and designed to negate a value or belief. INTERSECTIOALITY - a marketed Marxist term - is the attack matrix that bundles lines of attack to CANCEL every cultural & personal value in the targeted CULTURE.

@real_sensible 30) And when a culture has had its identity completely negated when it has been fully canceled. It can now be awakened - or woke. Of course, this term is directly related to Mao's Mass Line which constitutes Mao's political warfare strategy -

@real_sensible 31) All this comes from the graphic of the fighter dropping dialectical bombs on pre-planned target populations - you. This is how to understand Heritage's generating your terms in upcoming dialectical attks when also framing responses that prohibit looking outside the blast zone

@TrynaBeLogical @real_sensible 2) Did the country permanently turn to the Left w Obamacare when the Dems passed it or was the shift permanent when voters rejected it by electing GOPe in House, Senate, and Executive to overturn it and then they chose not to? It's the GOPe that institutionalized Obamacare.

@TrynaBeLogical @real_sensible 3) The greatest recurring negation in the American political process comes when the GOPe caucuses to agree on platforms & then immediately (dialectically) negates them by saying, "Now we have to move to the middle," which always means 'move to the Left - negating their base.