Thread by @ddantes69

No one really follows my account, but to organise my thoughts on the subject in a place I can easily come back to, as well as entertain myself on this indolent Sunday morning, going to write a thread on the Palestinian Israeli conflict here from a Nietzschean perspective

The Middle East in antiquity, since the peak of the Assyrian empire in the 7th century BC, was largely ruled by a series of pagan warrior aristocracies. The Assyrians, then the babylonians, then the Persians, then the Greeks, then the romans/parthians

With the ascendancy of Islam over the region in the 8th century AD, this marked the effective extinction of all paganism and the introduction of a “genetic sieve” so to speak on the entirety of the population.

In a post-Abrahamic Middle East, it was historically taboo to marry outside of one’s religion: even with the different sects of Christianity and Islam, to wed another outside of one’s subdivision was deeply frowned upon, even punishable by death.

What this means is that, in the Middle East, gene pools and religions have been and still largely are effectively indistinguishable (although this is changing but I digress).

…as the habits/beliefs/rituals and overall structure of a given religion are optimised for a certain genetic type, and more than this, the continued survival of and adherence to any given sort of Abrahamism further perpetuates this genetic type

This is a profound point, and one of *only two* overall points that one needs to understand the illusory complexity of the Middle East (the second being that unlike Europe, due to geography, the region can only be stable under a singular, centralized govenrment

(I will return to the second point later)

Anyways back to genes, we can see this starkly in Sunni Muslims for example. Sunnis enjoy claiming that a return to the caliphate will return the region to a “golden age” similar to that under the Abbasid caliphate

…but all evidence points to the “golden age” being an aberrant side effect of Islam, one in which not only Persians and Christians heavily contributed to, but also one that was bound to occur in that region regardless at that given time period

…and also one which was allowed to occur because the full dysgenic impact of Islam had not yet been felt.

Islam, while at first glance seeming to be heavily manly, horonable, and practical, is the reduction of humanity to a fanatical, dysgenic, NPC ratmass slum

If you disagree, you need only look at the largest Muslim cities today: Cairo, Lahore, Jakarta, are all the proof one needs that the ultimate end result of islam is the unchecked proliferation of dysgenic life and the destruction of all beauty and higher aim

…which would never have occurred in the ancient world, where eugenic warrior aristocracies routinely cleansed it of such filth and provided checks and balances on the expansion of lower orders life.

There is much to say on this subject, for example what customs and aspects of Islam necessarily force this to occur, and counter arguments Muslim NPCs will provide such as Dubai. which is of course a synthetic monstrosity funded entirely by a transient petrodollar system

But regardless, zooming out and zooming back in, a separate sieve was placed on Jews: as their ideology was inherently one of racial supremacism, they could not replenish their numbers through conversion and as such had to survive through parasitism and Machiavellianism

…and *not* through direct force of arms. This has led to a people highly intelligent and capable of building advanced civilization, yet cowardly and incapable of waging war in an honorable, eugenic manner

…relying on moralisms and manipulation of powerful foreign entities to defend itself.

So now we can see the reality of the situation: the Palestinian-Israeli conflict is not a war of “who deserves what”: that is totally absurd.

It’s absurd because any land any government on the planet currently controls was at one point or another owned by a different people, and a different government, and taken by force.

Instead, the real war here is over what form of dysgenics win out.

So on the one hand, you have Palestinians, who, if they win, would turn the entire region to a toxic sewer.

And on the other, you have the Israelies, who’s most potent entities are either satanic Ashkenazis that worship the inversion of natural dominance hierarchies

…or inbred Orthodox Jews who believe all other races are piglike, despite the fact that their own gene pool is littered with more congenital deformities than any other,who live in a lalaland of autistic line by line interpretation of ancient desert dwelling fairy tales

Both of these jewish groups would turn the entirety of humanity to radioactive dust if they could but rule over the ashes.

So ultimately, there are no winners in this conflict and, furthermore, it can only end in violence and a singular winner.

The reason for this is the second overarching point I mentioned earlier: that the Middle East, due to its lack of natural geographical barriers, is a region that on the whole can only be stable under one ruler.

This can be seen time and time again in history, most recently under the ottomans, under whom there was peace for 300+ years.

So the reason why there is so much war in the Middle East today vs historically, is that an artificial demarcation of territory has separated it from its natural state: one large, centralized empire.

And there is no getting around this: nature abhors a vacuum, and war will continue until the natural centralized equilibrium is reached and the vacuum filled.

This is why I find all calls for peace in the region so cringe: not only is peace impossible

…but even if it were to be achieved, it would be some abhorrent amalgamation of fanatical Abrahamic desert dwelling cults, both of which would continue the slow slide towards dysgenic destruction of the region, and oblivion

I have yet to mention the Christians (maronites Assyrians Greek orthdoox etc) in the region because they have become politically irrelevant, but to my mind they, along with a few other groups such as many Iranians, are the true genetic descendants

….of the ancient and therefore natural rulers of the Middle East. Their issue is similar to that of Europe: that Christian slave morality has totally castrated them, that they have been incapable of replenishing their numbers from endless conflict with Islam

…and are too noble to stoop to the survival tactics employed by Jews. But there is a reason Lebanon was the pinnacle of the region prior to its islamization, that Europeans and Arabs alike would flock to there, and that reason goes beyond culture and happenstance

…and that reason is genetic. That reason, is the peculiarities of the genetic selection Christianity applied to the population vs Jewish and Muslim ones. Whether anyone has the balls to admit it or not.

So to conclude: my opinion on the conflict? Israel and Palestine can go to hell, what matters is beauty and biological quality.

The Levant is rightful Byzantine clay.