Gregg Carlstrom Profile picture
Oct 9 9 tweets 2 min read Twitter logo Read on Twitter
Quick 🧵 on this @WSJ piece, which reports claims from Hamas and Hizballah that Iran "helped plan Hamas's Saturday surprise attack on Israel and gave the green light." Those claims are being used to support a narrative that is thus far unsubstantiated. wsj.com/world/middle-e…
Let's state from the outset: of course there was some Iranian role in this attack. Iran finances Hamas and Islamic Jihad, smuggles weapons to Gaza and provides technical help for building rockets and drones. To say Iran was not involved *at all* is just propaganda.
That said, Iran and its proxies are keen to promote another bit of propaganda. They call it "unity of the arenas": the idea that an array of militant groups, in Gaza, the West Bank, Lebanon and Syria, will coordinate to fight Israel.
Unity can be a bit elusive on the ground. Even Hamas and Islamic Jihad, the two main groups in Gaza, do not always work well together. Hizballah has a different constituency and a different set of considerations. But the narrative of a united front serves their interests.
Turning to the WSJ piece. Every Israeli I've spoken to over the past 48 hours believes this attack was planned over many months. The WSJ's sources say Iranian officers attended meetings for several weeks. In other words, the planning almost certainly predates their involvement.
The WSJ's sources also claim that Hossein Amir-Abdollahian "attended at least two of the meetings". It strains credibility a bit to think that Iran's FM, an apparatchik and the target of much surveillance, would be brought in to plan a highly secret military operation.
This stuff might seem academic. But there is a narrative taking hold: the WSJ piece proves Iran ordered and planned the attack. It doesn't prove that or even really assert that. Nor does other credible reporting. And perhaps we should be cautious about taking Hamas at face value.
There was almost certainly some coordination within the "resistance axis". Hamas would not have launched an attack of this magnitude without alerting its partners. But coordination is not the same thing as Iran giving Hamas an order to go launch a mass attack on Israel.
And to emphasize this again: just because Hamas and Hizballah claim something does not make it true. Remarkable how the same people who say "Iran's regime lies all the time" (which it does!) are willing to accept claims from Iran and its allies when they fit the right narrative.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Gregg Carlstrom

Gregg Carlstrom Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @glcarlstrom

Oct 9
On Israel and Lebanon: the messaging from Hizballah is that a major ground offensive in Gaza would draw it into the war. That is a threat worth taking seriously. But there are also a couple of caveats to throw out.
One is that a broad swath of Lebanese do not want to get involved. The country is falling apart, mired in one of the worst economic crises in history. It cannot afford a war, and Hizballah would face unpredictable political consequences at home for dragging it into one.
The other is that, from Iran's perspective, a ground offensive in Gaza would degrade one of its assets. Would it urge Hizballah to get involved and risk similar damage? Or would it decide to, in effect, cut its losses and preserve the crown jewel in its network of militias?
Read 4 tweets
Oct 7
A few thoughts on today, in no particular order. First, among Israelis: impossible to overstate the level of shock. The intelligence failure resembles 1973, but you almost have to go back to 1948 to find an analogue for the violence that played out in cities and towns. 🧵
It'll take a few days to know the scale of Israel's response. Netanyahu has historically been cautious about using military force. But he's now surrounded by a coterie of incompetent ideologues, and public opinion will probably be in favor of a dramatic change to the status quo.
The presence of so many Israeli hostages in Gaza will be an argument against a major ground offensive. But they are worth far more to Hamas alive than dead: the group will want to exchange them for prisoners to score a political victory.
Read 7 tweets
Oct 5, 2022
Quick thread on oil, Biden and Saudi, because there are a few distinct issues that get muddled in the conversation: Is the latest OPEC+ production cut meant as a snub to America? Is it perceived as one? And what does this all mean for the Saudi-American relationship?
First, is it meant as a snub? The oil market is a mess right now. OPEC+ has little spare capacity; many producers fail to meet their quotas; sanctions on Russia are bifurcating the market; all sorts of wild cards about demand; and so on.
The Saudis have a rational interest in keeping prices high (trillion-dollar linear cities ain't gonna pay for themselves). They, and the rest of OPEC+, also want prices to be stable, and they want the oil sector to look lucrative enough that firms invest in building new capacity.
Read 8 tweets
Jul 10, 2022
Needless to say, it's unusual for a president to issue a preemptive defense of a foreign trip. Biden has done so with a bizarre smorgasbord of an op-ed that unintentionally says a lot about his administration's Middle East policy over the past 18 months. washingtonpost.com/opinions/2022/…
First, they don't have much to show for their efforts. Biden takes credit for last year's Gaza war lasting "just 11 days": inspirational stuff, guys. And for Yair Lapid calling Mahmoud Abbas to wish him a happy Eid, as if that was some sort of major diplomatic breakthrough.
Which leads to another theme: taking credit where it isn't quite due. The truce in Yemen, for example, came after long efforts by the UN, shifting battlefield dynamics and Saudi exhaustion with a losing war. But Biden presents it as the result of America's "persistent diplomacy."
Read 8 tweets
May 11, 2021
If you've never been to Gaza it's hard to grasp just how bleak it is. A whole generation now has grown up locked in a tiny enclave. They're coming of age in a place with no work, endless blackouts, barely any clean drinking water, and little prospect of getting out.
When I first started visiting, a decade ago, people directed their anger largely at Israel. In recent years they direct it at everyone: Israel, Egypt, America, the PA, Hamas, the UN. No one thinks the blockade will end; no one thinks political actors care about their plight.
Three years ago this week I stood on a berm in eastern Gaza and watched Israeli soldiers shoot hundreds of protesters. Some died. Others lost infected limbs in crowded hospitals short on medical supplies. Another "round," another awful human toll, and nothing changed for it.
Read 4 tweets
Jan 17, 2021
A quick thread on this piece. James Jeffrey has obviously been on a months-long effort to polish his legacy from the Trump years. Can only speak for myself, but I've come away from every interview, and now this article, thinking he's done the opposite. foreignaffairs.com/articles/middl…
First, the whole thing is a post hoc rationalization of Trump's approach to the Middle East. He didn't have a strategy. What he had, at best, were impulses that guided his policy: be tough on Iran; embrace Israel; don't criticize American partners in the region.
But none of this amounted to a strategy in the sense of setting achievable goals, identifying realistic actions that would accomplish those goals, and anticipating the behavior of adversaries. It was a chaotic, impulsive mess.
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(