As with London buses, you can wait ages for one war and then several come along. I've spent a lot of time in the past year and a half warning of a cascade of conflict and its likely consequences. A quick review:
It is mutually assured financial destruction that constrains today’s superpowers and most clearly distinguishes Cold War II from Cold War I. 1/10bloomberg.com/opinion/articl…
Decoupling is happening, and fast. Yet both sides have economic weaknesses that undercut these drives to reduce interdependence. On the Chinese side, recovery from the regime of “zero Covid” has been lackluster. 2/10
On the US side, recent years have witnessed a succession of excessively large federal deficits, in substantial measure financed by enlarging the Federal Reserve’s balance sheet. 3/10
The Biden administration's strategy of aligning democracies against autocracies could have an American Achilles’ heel: 1/10bloomberg.com/opinion/articl…
In Vilnius, Biden depicted the world in Manichean terms, divided starkly between the democracies, united in “the defense of freedom,” and their benighted foes, who would prefer “a world defined by coercion and exploitation, where might makes right.” 2/10
But this is not Cold War I, when there was an Iron Curtain between the free world and the communist world. This is a world with a "democratic recession" (@LarryDiamond), where "illiberal democracies" are on the rise (@FareedZakaria). 3/10
Two weeks ago, I warned that the geopolitics of Cold War II seemed to be pitting Halford J. Mackinder’s Eurasian “Heartland” against Nicholas J. Spykman’s “Rimland.” I worried that the Rimland was showing signs of division. But maybe it’s the Heartland that’s cracking up. 1/8
The striking point about the past year is that all three members of the new Heartland Axis are afflicted with internal problems -- the usual pathologies of unrepresentative government. 2/8bloomberg.com/opinion/articl…
But what if democracies are also vulnerable to such internal crises? Biden is falling over himself to make nice with Narendra Modi, whose government in India looks increasingly like one of those illiberal democracies that @FareedZakaria warned us about back in the 1990s. 3/8
Mahatma Gandhi supposedly replied, when he was asked for his view of Western civilization, that it would be a very good idea. I feel the same way about American leadership: It would be a very good idea. bloomberg.com/opinion/articl… 1/11
Many Europeans have the unpleasant feeling of being caught between two superpowers in a new cold war. They know China is partly to blame for this. But they see the US as equally culpable. 2/11
The problem in Ukraine is what might be called “the power law — geopolitical edition.” Put crudely, there is one very large contributor and a lot of very small ones. The very large contributor is of course the US. 3/11
How did the steam engine change the world? A lot. How did the internal combustion engine change the world? A lot. So how will battery-powered electric vehicles change the world? Probably a lot — but not necessarily in the ways we now anticipate. 1/9 bloomberg.com/opinion/articl…
First, this is clearly a chance for China to leapfrog the European manufacturers who perfected the internal-combustion engine. Around 31% of Chinese auto exports are of EVs or hybrids. And more than a third — 35% — of all the world’s EV exports are Chinese. 2/9
We have seen a version of this movie before. Between 1975 and 1980s, Japanese auto exports quintupled. The Japanese share of the US car market doubled from 6% in 1972 to 12% in 1978, and to 21% in 1980. 3/9
"When You're in a Cold War, Play for Time." "De-risking" is Washington's new word for detente. It's the right strategy as China's economy slows and its social problems grow. bloomberg.com/opinion/articl… 1/8
Detente is in the air, with the shift from "decoupling" to the less drastic "de-risking." Detente didn’t end Cold War I in the 1970s; it just made it less fractious, reducing the risk of World War III. The same is true in today’s cold war. 2/8
The Chinese worry a lot about the strategy of technological containment that the U.S. and its allies are pursuing. But maybe they should read Peter Turchin’s extraordinary new book, End Times: Elites, Counter-Elites and the Path of Political Disintegration. 3/8