/1🚨BREAKING — New AFL whitepaper reveals that the President of the United States has absolute authority over his presidential papers, undermining an essential element of the Biden DOJ’s Mar-a-Lago prosecution.
We explain in the thread below…
/2 This whitepaper details why–as a matter of constitutional law, the Presidential Records Act (PRA), and historical practice–the President of the United States has absolute authority over presidential papers. Neither Congress nor the federal courts may lawfully abrogate or limit this authority.
/3 This constitutional fact has significant implications for Special Counsel Jack Smith’s prosecution against Donald J. Trump in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida. The Department of Justice has charged Donald Trump with violating 18 U.S.C. § 793(e), which provides:
/4 In obtaining the search warrant to raid Mar-a-Lago in 2022, the Biden DOJ relied upon the definition of a “Presidential Record” in 42 U.S.C. § 2201 to support its position that Donald Trump retained documents he did not have the authority to retain at the conclusion of his presidency, and that somehow, the National Archives and Records Administration possessed the authority to require them to be returned.
/5 As explained in the whitepaper — text, precedent, and executive practice reinforce the historical tradition. The records a President creates or receives while performing the duties of his office are his presidential records. That test does not depend on the content of the records, or whether the records are classified.
/6 The test does not change when a President leaves office. If, for example, a former President acquires new records after leaving office, those new records would not enjoy the same constitutional status as his presidential records acquired while in office.
/7 But the Presidential records a President takes with him upon vacating the presidency are his, to do with as he pleases. The President can keep them, sell them, destroy them, or donate them, as all Presidents have done.
/8 Other commentators and analysts have asserted that the president has the absolute right under the PRA to determine which records are his, but they have not acknowledged the broader constitutional issues at the heart of the matter...keep reading.
/9 …Congress does not have the authority under the Constitution to tell the president which records are his and which are not.
/10 Since the founding of our republic, presidents leaving office have taken custody of their presidential records—the president’s records are his personal property because they were prepared by him, or for him, in furtherance of his official duties. The records also belong to him because the Constitution requires it.
/11 The documents that a president prepares or receives during his term in office belong to him. A reading of the Presidential Records Act that fails to account for a former president’s right to possess and control his records is inconsistent with the text, history, and precedent of presidential records.
/12 Thus, the politically-motivated Florida prosecution of President Trump is impossible under the law.
/1🧵@HomelandGOP released an interim report focusing on the devastating human costs of Secretary Mayorkas’ radical open-borders policies.
These policies are costing innocent American lives. Some highlights from the report below…
/2 Fentanyl is currently the leading cause of death for Americans ages 18-45 – and record-setting volumes of the highly lethal drug have been allowed into the United States by Mayorkas.
/3 Customs and Border Protection (CBP) reported seizing more than 25,300 pounds of fentanyl in FY 2023.
/1🚨THREAD — We just sued @thenorthface on behalf of Johnathan Talbot, alleging that a sponsored athlete for The North Face defamed him by falsely accusing him of making a racist comment, resulting in Talbot being terminated from his job at Outdoor Research.
Read on…
/2 As alleged in the complaint, Manoah Ainuu, a paid climber and brand ambassador for The North Face, used his large Instagram audience to communicate defamatory claims that Mr. Talbot had made racist comments to Ainuu and tried to assault him, all because Ainuu wanted to increase his fame and advance The North Face’s social justice mission, even if it meant maliciously destroying the reputation and career of Mr. Talbot, a man Ainuu had just met.
/3 As further alleged, Ainuu communicated his defamatory claim repeatedly online and solicited others to republish them.
/1🚨Our Center for Legal Equality filed a complaint with the American Bar Association asking for an investigation of Berkeley Law’s facially discriminatory hiring practices.
/2 On June 29, 2023, journalist Chris Rufo released a video of the University of California Berkeley’s School of Law’s Dean Erwin Chemerinsky admitting that the law school practices “unstated affirmative action” in faculty hiring.
/3 Dean Chemerinsky confirmed to the Daily Mail that the video was an authentic excerpt from his constitutional law class at Berkeley Law from the spring semester of 2023.
We just uncovered new documents obtained from our litigation against HHS, revealing how the Biden admin used $2 billion dollars in taxpayer funded contracts to house illegal aliens and enrich a former Obama/Biden admin staffer.
Must-read thread:
/2 In 2020, Family Endeavors hired Andrew Lorenzen-Strait, a former member of the Biden transition team.
/3 Shortly after Endeavors hired Lorenzen-Strait, HHS awarded it a single-source, no-bid contract worth $530 million dollars. foxnews.com/politics/dhs-i…
/1🚨BREAKING — Today, we called on the Department of Education to open an investigation of the Georgia Institute of Technology for violating Title IX of the Higher Education Act of 1972.
Read about how Georgia Tech is illegally discriminating against males…
/2 In 2012, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (“MIT”) began a program called “Rising Stars in EECS (Electrical Engineering and Computer Science)” (hereinafter “Rising Stars”) to encourage more women to participate in EECS academia.
/3 The program consisted of intensive training on the faculty selection process, as well as networking opportunities for doctoral candidates and graduates.
We confirmed that a Utah gender clinic knew of the deadly side-effects and risks of permanent damage resulting from “transgender” drugs given to children.
Read about the disturbing “treatments” being administered to minors in Utah…
/2 In June, we filed five public records requests with public gender clinics in Georgia, Iowa, Ohio, Utah, and Virginia to obtain records related to “gender-affirming care,”– a euphemism for chemical castration and genital mutilation.
/3 The social contagion known as “gender-affirming care,” involves prescribing puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones to children under 18, as well as using life-altering surgeries like mastectomies and vaginoplasty.