🧵So far on X the unconfirmed report about 40 murdered babies have at least 44 million impressions, 300k likes, over 100k reposts (retweets). The key propagators of the story were @i24NEWS_EN and @Israel, the story was based on a report by @Nicole_Zedek
The original report never claimed 40 babies were decapitated. Zedek reported that soldiers told her that up to '40 babies/children' were killed and '40 babies were taken out on gurneys'. She also stated on X that some babies heads had been cut off. However, those reports, which
came from an IDF soldier(s), have in some cases morphed and gone viral. Some outlets are reporting '40 babies killed', or '40 babies beheaded', while some are reporting '40 babies killed, some beheaded'. Neither the 40 babies being killed and/or beheaded has been independently
verified. Indeed, Sky News have said the IDF have refused to confirm the news. Meanwhile, some highly influential people are continuing to spread the news, including @jk_rowling - who has over 13 million followers. There is no doubt that civilians have been brutally massacred,
but narratives around slaughtered babies are particularly emotive and useful in propaganda and jingoism- historically (from WW1, to false information around the invasion of Iraq in 1990). A reminder to be careful of what you share, especially during live reporting
Regardless of how you frame this there is clearly misleading information around two things
a) ages killed (Zedek said 'babies/children')
b) how they were killed (some/all beheaded).
The lack or clarity & consistency, singular sourcing is enough to indicate caution with the story
It's also worth noting that some people have contributed to the narrative by trying to denounce it as propaganda, misrepresenting the original reporting by claiming Zidek explicitly said 40 babies were all beheaded.
In terms of methods for the analytics, I downloaded all tweets in the past 4 days that used the term '40 babies' with a minimum of 5 retweets (this is due to API limits). So, as I mentioned, the impressions, retweets,are a lowball number.
Just a sample of today's UK papers. The @MetroUK literally has 40 babies murdered as a headline along with an Israeli soldier holding a puppy. The Times isn't specific in the headline, but specifies that the babies throats were cut
The Daily Express has led with the beheading story, and the Sun have also included it on the front page. i and Telegraph also include the story on the front page.
Most of the papers trace the source back to the Zidek/ I24news report
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The earliest public post I could find for that fake quote about Hamas celebrating the Bondi Beach attacks (yes - the same fake quotes shared by @BillAckman @TRobinsonNewEra @EYakoby @WarMonitor3) appears to be @HenMazzig, but he deleted it. The second was an Indian pharmacist...
🧵1/ Quite expected how the Israeli press and Hasbara are trying to convince the world @FranceskAlbs was removed from Georgetown's affiliated faculty due to her antisemitism.
Actually, she was removed because she has been sanctioned by the US government
2/ As Maria Mayda, director of Georgetown University's ISIM said, '“U.S. institutions are prohibited by federal law from affiliating with individuals subject to U.S. sanctions,” she said.
3/ Furthermore, Albanese was sanctioned due to her 'engaging' with the ICC, pursuant to Trump's sanctions on the ICC - not antisemitsm. Antisemitism is mentioned, as is criticism of Israel and 'the west'. But as you can see, this is just ad hominem state.gov/releases/offic…
It's finally here! Remember that weird group of Emirati influencers you keep seeing online. Well I've done a VERY deep dive, & the story is even weirder than you can imagine!
2/ Until late 2024, most people had never heard of this group of Emirati influencers, including the somewhat infamous Rauda AlTenaiji. Then they appeared everywhere: op-eds, podcasts, think tanks, conferences. This piece maps how that visibility was built.
3/ This open source investigation documents a pattern of manufactured influence: coordinated account creation, shared studios, pseudo-news sites, AI-assisted content, and systematic amplification across platforms.
In the past week, hashtags linked to Southern #Yemen have surged on X notably:
القوات الجنوبيه طارده_للارهاب (“Southern forces are expelling terrorism”).
👉TLDR: over 5000 X bots are promoting promoting STC control of southern Yemen
2/ First, context: Saudi Arabia has mobilised up to 20,000 fighters on Yemen’s borders after the UAE-backed Southern Transitional Council (STC) made significant territorial advances in Hadhramaut and Mahra theguardian.com/world/2025/dec…
3/ The STC is using these gains to push for a return to two states, arguing that an independent South would act as a bulwark against terrorism and protect Red Sea shipping routes. Much of the international community continue to emphasise Yemen’s territorial unity.
On 13/08, a fake quote attributed to Hamas official Khalil al-Hayya circulated on X:
“The countdown to the next massacre has begun. Next time we will slaughter all the Jews"
It was debunked, but Gemini later stated it as fact >
2/ Firstly, this super sus account was the first I could find spreading the rumour on X (7.49 am UK time 13/08). @RonanMark572778 - whoever this 'pilot and physician' is has sent >113k tweets since July 2023. He also has a verified account (rememeber verification = algo boost).
3/ The narrative then was picked up on X by other accounts and influencers, changing ever so slightly. Accounts like @FleurHassanN @thevoicetruth1 (lol) got a lot of engagement and 'legitimised' the rumour.
NOTE: Not one of these accounts is providing a source to the quote.
🧵🚨1/ This verified X account posing as an American doctor has been spreading pro-Israel propaganda, justifying the killing of journalists, and posting predominantly anti–Sudanese Armed Forces content. The account is fake.>
#disinformation #gazagenocide #Sudan
2/ The first clear red flags are the tweets versus creation date ratio.
The account was created in 2009, but has only tweeted 1090 times, and the first of those was on April 2025. This means the account has been appropriated/hacked/bought and its old tweets scrubbed.
3/ I located the unique user id of the account. I ran this user id via the botometer archive of bots and it tells me that in February 2023 the account was called 'sitaramks', not 'nate_jone'