We've been seeing the russians suffer horrific losses at Avdiivka, but now there are indications that this disaster is worse even than it first appears.
---
AN ANALYSIS OF RUSSIAN ARTILLERY SUPPORT
In the absence of effective air superiority on both sides, combats devolve into a WWI-style combat where artillery shapes the battlefield.
This means that failing to establish artillery dominance over the battlefield is a recipe for disaster. Yet this is exactly what the Russians have failed to do in Avdiivka.
---
>> Russian artillery pieces are showing the effects of long use:
Firstly, while the russians have a large amount of artillery in the area, and while these units even outnumber Ukrainian units, the russian units field artillery pieces that have barrels that are largely worn out from long use - which means that their accuracy is questionable, to say the least.
Yes, the russians can blanket an area with artillery fire, but whether any of it will actually hit anywhere near where it is required is an open question.
---
>> Hardened Ukrainian Defenses:
Not only that, but Ukrainian defenses in the area are extremely well built, and in my opinion the shells presently being used by russian artillery units in the area are entirely inadequate to the task of demolishing these fortifications.
---
>> Effective Ukrainian Counter-Battery Fire
Couple that with the fact that Ukrainian artillery units deployed here are extremely adept at counter-battery fire, using shoot-and-scoot tactics that cause constant attrition amongst russian artillery while themselves evading counter-fire.
---
All this amounts to russia having utterly failed to achieve artillery dominance of the battlefield – which also means that they are unable to effectively support assault units as they try to advance.
(2/)
LOSSES AMONG ADVANCING RUSSIAN INFANTRY AND ARMOR
I don’t believe it is necessary for me to go into detail here, as there are dozens of videos of the losses the russians have been taking all over this platform, but suffice it to say that russian losses are on a scale that is unsustainable for an army that seeks to retain its combat effectiveness.
They have more lost more than 2000 troops and 300 vehicles in the last three days.
Troops and armor are flung against hardened fortifications, and armor is sent blindly into minefields or into artillery enfilades.
There are even some reports of the russian army trying to move troops forward in assaults in unprotected trucks, instead of in armored fighting vehicles.
---
While russia has proven time and again in this war that it is willing to callously sacrifice the lives of its people to attain even the smallest territorial gain, I believe that assaults such those as that being conducted at Avdiivka nevertheless strain the endurance, not only of the russian army, but of the russian state as a whole.
---
This is not a ‘war of survival’ for the Russian people - that is to say, they are not fighting off an invasion on their territory.
Therefore Putin cannot expect them to show the same resolve and to absorb the same losses as they did in WWII.
That said, I believe that a ‘breaking point’ will be reached if they lose more than 500,000 troops in this conflict – and while that seems a considerable distance away, they seem to be making dedicated efforts to attain just such losses.
(3/)
THE SITUATION IN RUSSIAN FIELD HOSPITALS BEHIND THE FRONT
By all indications the numbers of wounded being brought in have entirely overwhelmed the medical facilities available, with triage being resorted to, and desperate calls being made to doctors and surgeons across russia to ‘take a vacation’, and come to help in Avdiivka.
Whether any russian doctors fortunate enough to not be in Ukraine will be naïve enough to rise to this plea remains an open question.
RUSSIAN SETBACKS ON THE BATTLEFIELD
After the horrific price paid in their advances to the north of the city, where their forces had some success, taking a waste heap near a coke plant (shown below) that could serve as a strong point, there are now reports coming in that Ukrainian forces have pushed their forces back and have re-taken these areas.
(4/)
THE ESSENTIAL FAILINGS OF THE RUSSIAN ARMY
The essential failing of the russian army is in that they are actually still – in part – applying methodologies and tactics that showed success in Syria – where they faced a poorly armed opposition, or where they were even acting against civilian populations.
It is also crucial that the russian armed forces expended their entire stocks of many crucial munitions in Syria, including the long-range precision missiles that would have allowed their aircraft to remain out of range of light anti-aircraft weaponry – which is precisely why they do not at present posses air superiority over the battlescape.
Russia desperately tries to adapt, for example, as it has done in the procurement of Iranian drones, as well as in their own production and upgrading of Lancets.
However, by and large, they still use the disastrous methodologies that would have been acceptable in WWI, but which, today, result in losses of irreplaceable veterans soldiers, and the reduction of their army in combat expertise until it will essentially be composed of raw recruits and conscripts.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
GAINING A GENUINE UNDERSTANDING THE ISRAELI-PALESTINIAN CONFLICT...
(1/)
Before taking sides in this conflict, I think it would help if people understood the history of the region, and what lies behind the establishment of the State of Israel.
We're going to go far back in history, and see how past events led to the events of the present day.
---
THE ANCIENT DESTRUCTION OF ISRAEL
The Israeli nation was utterly disbanded and Jerusalem levelled to the ground, and the Israeli people scattered over the face of the world nearly two thousand years ago by the Roman Empire under the Emperor Hadrian, in response to the Bar Kokhba revolt of 132 CE.
This was the moment when the region was renamed 'Syria Palaestina' by the Romans.
The Jews were banned from Jerusalem for centuries to come.
The Jewish population fled the region in large numbers, to be replaced by pagans, Roman veterans and settlers from the Western regions of the Roman Empire. Heavy taxation caused even more of the Jewish people to flee.
When the Roman Empire converted to Christianity, Jerusalem became a Christian city. The Jews had at this point been banned from living in Jerusalem for centuries.
Christianity was now the dominant religion of the region that had once been Israel.
(2/)
THE ARAB CONQUEST
The Arabs conquered the region in 635 CE.
Of course, with the Arab conquest, what with locals fleeing the region, or converting, and Arabs immigration, the demographics gradually changed.
Christians remained the dominant part of the population for a long time, but this gradually changed until the population was predominantly Muslim.
(3/)
THE YEAR 1900
There had been some immigration of Jews back to Palestine, leading to Jerusalem becoming a largely Jewish city. The Jewish population in Palestine was about 23,000 at this time.
However, the total population of Palestine was at this point still 88% Muslim and 9% Christian.
The word Holodomor refers to the ‘Terror Famine’ inflicted on Ukraine, which cost around seven million Ukrainian lives.
---
BEFORE I BEGIN, I WANT TO SAY THAT THE PHOTOGRAPHS USED IN THIS THREAD (WHILE ALSO AVAILABLE ON THE NET) WERE GIVEN TO ME PERSONALLY BY THE ACTUAL HEIR OF THE MAN WHO ORIGINALLY TOOK THEM.
I also have in my possession the original notes and memoirs of this Holodomor witness, also given to me by his heirs.
These notes and memoirs make for chilling, horrific reading.
As you read this thread, spare a thought to the heroism of the man who took these photographs, and who those few brave souls who wrote down their first-witness accounts and smuggled them out of the Soviet Union so that the world would know of this crime.
(2/)
Most historians now agree that the famine was – at least in its origins – a result of the imbecile heights that Russian mismanagement could rise to.
The Soviets, by trying to work communal theories of farming, and especially by setting party bureaucrats to run those farms,… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
(3/)
A decision was made to seize ALL the food in Ukraine – which (as I said earlier) was one of the most prolific food-producing regions.
In 1933, the Russian army raided villages in Ukraine, confiscating all food, especially in 'blacklisted' areas – even food-stores from… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
I'm sick of pro-Russians saying that 'Crimea is intrinsically Russian'.
(Thread 1/)
So let's take a look at just how 'Russian' Crimea is... and how it came to be that way.
---
Crimea's original population was NOT Russian, of course.
The idea that Crimea's population was 'always Russian' is absolutely ridiculous - and is an absolute lie as well.
Crimea's original population were Crimean Tatars - most of whom are now extinct.
This is their story.
(2/)
Russia brutally conquered Crimea in 1783.
At that point, there were about a million Crimean Tatars living in Crimea.
Russia found their existence... inconvenient.
After all, if Crimea continued to have an indigenous population, how would the descendants of those original Russian conquerors be able to claim that 'Crimea was intrinsically Russian' in 2023?
Can't have indigenous populations in conquered territories when you're an Empire, you know.
So the Russian Empire began decimating the Crimean Tatars.
(3/)
The Russian Empire started with a repressive regime that punished the slightest sign of independence on the part of the Crimean Tatars with brutal torture.
This oppression was so brutal that HALF A MILLION Tatars - half the entire population - fled to Turkey in sheer terror.
Their descendants still live there.
So the indigenous population was conveniently halved.
And the population of Tatars continued to decline thereafter.
But Russia wasn't done - this was just the beginning.
SELLING PEOPLE INTO SLAVERY FOR 'PEACE'
(Thread 1/)
We've all seen recently how a NATO functionary talked so casually of Ukraine 'giving territories to russia' in exchange 'for joining NATO'.
There's also a small section of the US population who talk of 'how aid should not be sent to Ukraine, but 'should be spent in the US'.
Let me speak upon this subject as a person whose family ACTUALLY LIVED UNDER RUSSIAN OCCUPATION...
(2/)
First, I'll speak to those who talk of 'giving territories to russia in exchange for 'peace''.
Do you even understand what you are saying?
Can you picture blood-spattered cellars, ringing with screams of pain as bones are broken?
Can you see human beings being subjected to electrical shocks until their hearts stop?
Can you stand and watch as a russian torturer with a pair of pliers pulls out a woman's fingernails?
Do you understand that this is what you will make happen? That THIS is what will happen to the people you 'give to russian in exchange for 'peace''?
Do you understand that if human beings are handed over to russia on YOUR recommendation, when those human beings are tortured to death and buried in nameless graves, the blood-guilt will be YOURS as well as russia's?
It is a stain that will never wash out.
Understand what you do.
You recommend CRUCIFYING us, just so that you can have what you call 'peace'.
I KNOW.
My family lived under russian occupation. My uncle and cousin were 'questioned' by the russians'.
Three people out of ten taken away from my village were tortured to death, and never seen again.
I know.
Now YOU know, too.
(3/)
Now I'll speak to that section of the US population who say that 'aid should not be sent to Ukraine, but should be spent in the US.'
And I ask you THIS...
Before the war in Ukraine, was there no poverty in the US?
No inequality? No disadvantaged people?
No homeless?
DID YOU HAVE NO POOR, that giving aid to Ukraine has now suddenly 'made you poor'?
---
Now HEAR THIS. If you stop aid to Ukraine, THIS is what will happen.
You think we will surrender, that we will be slaves.
We will not be slaves.
If you cut aid, we will send our women and children out of the country, and then we will fight for our freedom to the last round.
And when we reach that last round, we will use it to give ourselves the final freedom.
THE PRESENT STATUS OF US ATACMS MISSLES
(Thread 1/3)
We often hear of the US being unwilling to draw upon 'limited stocks' of ATACMS missiles.
Let's examine how limited these stocks are. Here are the facts...
4000 ATACMS missiles were originally produced.
Of these 560 were used in combat, and various quantities were sold to various powers around the world. Add one or two HUNDRED to the total to round it off, and it still does not amount to more than 1500 missiles either used OR sold.
The US should have between 2000 to 2500 ATACMS in its inventory at this point.
---
Did you know that the ATACMS missiles are being replaced this year?
Yes, this year the ATACMS are being phased out of the arsenal of the Armed Forces of the United States.
The replacement for the ATACMS, the Precision Strike Missile (PrSM) program is being implemented this year, providing the US with a replacement for the ATACMS.
The PrSM has a range of 500 km, with future variations slated to have a range of 1000 km. This program is slated to attain initial operational capability this year, and should attain full operational capability by 2025. Initial plans are to produce 1000 of these missiles.
Lockheed Martin is currently producing the PrSM Inc 1 missiles (range 500 km).
These missiles, along with future missile increments, can be launched from both the M270A2 Multiple Launch Rocket System (MLRS) and the M142 High Mobility Artillery Rocket System (HIMARS).
Development is ALREADY underway on a more advanced version of PrSM that can strike targets 1000 km away.
---
These are the FACTS.
Can the US afford to give Ukraine ATACMS?
You decide.
And should you decide in favor of sending ATACMS to Ukraine, contact your representatives in government.
Demand action.
The facts - the truth - is in your hands.
(2/3)
Note that the US has already given 64 ATACMS to Taiwan.
That said, there are little or no grounds for not allowing Ukraine to also use the missiles.
(2/6)
Firstly, I need to tell you what's been happening in this little-known part of the battlefield over the last few months.
While glorious, bloody battles were fought elsewhere, in Kherson, brilliant counter-battery artillery teams on the Ukrainian side of the river HAVE… https://t.co/8GPxifpPXutwitter.com/i/web/status/1…
(3/6)
But this news, good as it is, is only the beginning. Let's take a step way, way back, and look at the bigger picture, shall we?
I said, in the beginning of the previous post, that russia was being pushed into a lose-lose position. Here's how.