Tweet

More from @dezzie_rezzie

Destiny Rezendes

@dezzie_rezzie

Oct 5

1🧵Covid disrupted life as we knew it & since the first lock-down things haven't been the same. We went into 2020 w/ Bill & Melinda Gates a happily married couple-no more by 2021. I got a hold of their foundations 2019 IRS 990 to see what the happy Ex's were up.

2🧵For a quick recap: Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, a "philanthropic" powerhouse since 2000 was a lead stakeholder in the C19 response- landing a $200Billion ROI on a $2Billion dollar investment into vaccines. Though C19 is fading away the couple gleefully looks to the future.

3🧵In June of 202 watch the couple smirk & say that the next Pandemic "will get attention this time!" @CSPAN A scene straight out of a "Get out" style dystopian nightmare.c-span.org/video/?c501058…

Read 13 tweets

Destiny Rezendes

@dezzie_rezzie

Sep 23

🚨🧵Long before the 2015 UN drafting of Agenda 2030 and the Orwellian planning document "Lockstep" by the Rockefeller foundation in 2010 there had been a precursor planning out the future of mankind. One scrubbed from the public eye called "Mapping the Global Future."

2🧵 Now this document I found last night after being repeatedly met w/ broken links & erased files. The document had been thoroughly scrubbed from 2013 til now & only the earliest archive[thnx to a FOIA]of the file remained. Authored in 2004 by the National Intelligence Council.

3🧵The National Intel Council [NIC] was new to me. Turns out just a few years following the Church Committee [1975] the NIC was formed [1979] & one of their roles is to release every 4yrs a futures planning doc. This one from 2004's subtitle was "Project 2020"

Read 11 tweets

Destiny Rezendes

@dezzie_rezzie

Sep 18

1📵Recent reporting coming out of the UK has rang the alarm bells on the Iphone 12 after hundreds of tested 2020 Iphone model 12's greatly failed the UK's EMF safety limits. Due to the excessive radiation (5.74 W/kg) detected well over the 4W/kg limit sales have been halted.

2📵 Despite the fact the United States has been slow to prove the dangers of millimeter wave non-ionizing radiation, other countries have been strict on the deleterious effects. In the early 2000's & since tech companies have repeatedly denied damage or cited lack of info.

3📵The idea the USG did not have data on harmful millimeter wave EMFs is shattered when you see that the CIA in May of 2012 declassified a 68pg compendium of Russian studies showing serious biological damages from mm EMFs. The studies date back to 1970-hidden for 40+yrs!

Read 6 tweets

Destiny Rezendes

@dezzie_rezzie

Sep 15

1🧵The 22nd anniversary of 9/11 recently passed us & it's important to remember what followed that day. Beyond the shaken emotions and travel changes there was also the big lie. The hunt for a boogeyman dubbed "Weapons of Mass Destruction." Turns out, WMD has a brother...

2🧵WMDs ushered in the Project Biosheild Act, & with it BILLIONS saturated the fields of biological countermeasure research. People terrified of white powder in the mail happily endorsed the Gov's grift -all for our safety? Right?

3🧵Now in 2023 we face a relative of WMD, the younger sibling, "Weapons of Mass Disruption." It was a term used in the Synthetic Genomics paper by Baric in 2006, & its making a comeback through Synthetic Bio-Warfare, touted by DARPA agent James Giordano.

Read 9 tweets

Destiny Rezendes

@dezzie_rezzie

Sep 14

🔎🦠In 2006, Ralph Baric wrote a white paper titled: Synthetic Viral Genomics: Risks & Benefits for Science & Society which was part of a larger compendium published in 2007 of technical reports in support of a study by the Sloan Foundation on DNA synthesis & governance. The compilation of reports, including Baric’s was in part formed after a series of invitational discussions. Compiled by Garfinkel, Endy, Epstein and Friedman and uploaded to the MIT libraries.

Published to MIT’s library since 12-04-2007 (15+yrs ago) and yet according to MIT the document has only received a total of 3.4K downloads and page views. Although the US ranks #1 for the page views for the document, we fall to #3 for downloads- trailing behind Romania and China.

The paper came on the heels of the United Nations Security Council Resolution [UNSCR] 1540 of 2004 to which all states parties agreed to abstain from:

1. “… providing any form of support to non-State actors that attempt to develop, acquire, manufacture, possess, transport, transfer or use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons and their means of delivery
2. · …. all States, in accordance with their national procedures, shall adopt and enforce appropriate effective laws which prohibit any non-State actor to manufacture, acquire, possess, develop, transport, transfer or use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons and their means of delivery, in particular for terrorist purposes, as well as attempts to engage in any of the foregoing activities, participate in them as an accomplice, assist or finance them;
3. · …. all States shall take and enforce effective measures to establish domestic controls to prevent the proliferation of nuclear, chemical, or biological weapons and their means of delivery, including by establishing appropriate controls over related materials and to this end shall:

Baric’s paper came just before the inclusion of agreement #19 in the Final Declaration of the Sixth Review Conference (2006) of the Biological Weapons Convention [BWC] which stated:

“The Conference urges States Parties to promote the development of training and education programs for those granted access to biological agents and toxins relevant to the Convention and for those with the knowledge or capacity to modify such agents …as well as of the obligations of States Parties under the Convention. (BTWC 2006)”

In the report, Baric’s article spans 49 pages and discusses viruses, synthetic genomics, biological warfare & biosecurity concerning selected agents. Having just gone through the SARS pandemic of 2003 which left many rattled because despite its short 6 month duration it carried with it a 9.5% fatality rate and managed to stretch across over 24 countries. Being that Baric had already spent years studying coronaviruses he was more than prepared to write on the topic by the time of the whitepaper.
However, two years prior to the paper scientists had hit a major setback with unsuccessfully creating a usable vaccine- when infamously a SARS vaccine trial ended up killing the entire studies ferret participants- the inability to create a tolerable vaccine lasted until Covid-19 (& even then its debatable.)

Among the startling statements made by Ralph Baric in this article was his omission and elaboration of his hallmark expertise of hiding all traces of splicing and manipulating coronaviruses [specifically SARS-CoV], a technique he refers to as “No see’m Sites”

Page after page, Baric seems to brag about the benefits of synthetic genome assembly claiming its capacity to “provide unparalleled power for building genomes” also opens the door for “nefarious use.”

He explains that traditional recombinant DNA assembly methods maintain the “signature of the parent virus” that is used in it’s construction during a cloning process but that this was NOT the case in synthetic viral genomics with his method. He horrifying states the following about his method’s capabilities;

“synthetic viral genomes can be designed to be identical with exact virus strains circulating in any given location from any year. This powerful technique provides the bioterrorist with a “scapegoat” option; leaving a sequence signature that misdirects efforts at tracking the true originators of the crime. Even better, the approach could be used to build mistrust and/or precipitate open warfare between nations.”

This new reality according to Baric came about specifically due to coronaviruses which happen to allow for such manipulation to occur much more easily than other families of viruses. He postulates about how a “clever” bioterrorist could easily steal, borrow, and buy coronaviruses claiming the advances of synthetic genomics and that its advancements lie in the “ speed and a mutagenesis capacity that allow for whole genome design in a cost effective manner”

Baric states that the SARS-CoV 2003 strain was “extinct in the wild, but is present in many laboratories throughout the world” and that the “isolates were never successfully cultured and not distributed outside of China.” Leaving the SARS-CoV pathogen only found in either a synthetic form or in a laboratory and no longer existing in the wild.

When Baric asks himself whether or not synthetic or recombinant bioweapons be created for Bio-Warfare he lays out two scenarios:

1- If the goal were to kill as many as possible than natural sourced viruses are a more “reliable source” and the conditions of getting a natural pathogen are easier
2- If the goal however isn’t to kill the most people possible but rather to aim for “notoriety, fear and directing foreign government policies are principle objectives, then the release and subsequent discovery of a synthetically derived virus bioweapon will certainly garner tremendous media coverage, inspire fear and terrorize human populations and direct severe pressure on government officials to respond in predicted ways”
The document is an astonishing read and I encourage everyone to do so. As Baric states in the introduction SARS had the ability to overwhelm the health care system and was a “weapon of mass disruption” and that the future that followed that 2006/2007 article accurately predicted, “synthetic genomics…will change [sic] the landscape of the human population” and the arena of BioWarfare would forever be changed.

For a direct link to the Paper referenced above please see attached comment below 🔎

Link: dspace.mit.edu/bitstream/hand…

Read 4 tweets

Destiny Rezendes

@dezzie_rezzie

Sep 3

1🧵Oliver Anthony's song has become the people's American Anthem not because of a ritzy product-laden music video but simple because it resonates with the concerns of everyday people. Oliver was right.. they wanna know what we; think, what we do, and we all know it.

2🧵Covid-19 might have been the primary disease they were worried about, but they spared no expense fighting another dangerous epidemic they call "Misinformation." Like C19, they're convinced they can inoculate you into safety w/ a misinformation "vaxx" called, "Pre-bunking."

3🧵"Pre-bunking" is a term popularized by Google's censorship gestapo, Jigsaw. The Orwellian term is a manipulation tactic which aims to preemptively counter conclusions they deem wrong BEFORE you are even confronted w/them- also referred to as "Inoculation Theory."

Read 12 tweets

Share this page!

Enter URL or ID to Unroll

Destiny Rezendes

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

More from @dezzie_rezzie

Destiny Rezendes

Destiny Rezendes

Destiny Rezendes

Destiny Rezendes

Destiny Rezendes

Destiny Rezendes

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Send Email!