The Chivalry Guild Profile picture
Oct 17 9 tweets 3 min read Twitter logo Read on Twitter
The First Crusade is one of the greatest adventures in all of history: an armed pilgrimage of 2000+ miles testing the human spirit in the most intense ways. Battles, famines, disasters, miracles, etc.

Plus there was a famous duel between a great warrior and a bear. 🧵 Image
In his chronicles of the First Crusade, William of Tyre recounts the harrowing episode of Godfrey of Bouillon and others taking to the woods to hunt game in Pisidia, on the way to Antioch.
Image
Image
Godfrey heard a loud roar from a ways away, rode toward it, and there found an “enormous” bear chasing a man. It was later confirmed to be a man-eater.

Naturally he (and his brave horse) rushed toward the bear, which gave up pursuit of its original victim and attacked Godfrey.
The bear wounded the horse and the man was now on foot. He went to finish the bear with a big swing of his sword, but it didn’t quite land.

The bear countered with a takedown of his own, pinned Godfrey to the ground, and even got its teeth into Godfrey’s throat. Image
It got worse for the legendary Crusader. His sword had cut into his own leg, opening an artery.
With one final effort, Godfrey mustered the last of his famous strength and “seized the monster with his left hand and with his right plunged the sword up to the hilt in the side of the struggling beast.”

As he did, another knight also struck a great blow to the bear. Image
Godfrey was left nearly lifeless. They carried his body back to camp and people wailed at the sight of the great men laid so low.
They also brought with the bear he had helped kill, and the starving Crusaders got some badly needed red meat. Pilgrims said they “had never seen anything like it in size.”

A very mixed blessing: they would get to eat, but they appeared to have lost their leader.
But God wasn't done with his warrior.

Godfrey reappears in the chronicles at the Siege of Antioch. William notes that Godfrey had recovered “fully from the serious illness which had long troubled him, the result of the wound which he had suffered from a bear.”

Legend. Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with The Chivalry Guild

The Chivalry Guild Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ChivalryGuild

Oct 15
Are you strong enough to chop off the head of a camel? A request made of Godfrey of Bouillon.🧵

The great Crusader's reputation spread far and wide after the conquest of Jerusalem in 1099. An Arab chief wanted to see for himself. So he traveled to meet Godfrey. Image
William of Tyre recounts the challenge: “The Arab chief earnestly begged Godfrey that he would deign to smite with his own sword an immense camel which he had brought for this purpose.”
The chief wished to be able to tell others that he had seen Godfrey’s strength with his own eyes. For his part, Godfrey probably didn't want to harm the poor animal, but he consented since the man had come from far away to see it.

You've got to give the people what they want. Image
Read 7 tweets
Oct 13
Me reading about Sobieski coming to the rescue of Vienna in 1683. 🧵
Image
Image
On September 8th, the Viennese fired distress rockets into the night sky to let any friends who might be out there know that they needed help—now or never. Image
The city had been under siege for almost two months by the Ottoman Turks, and the Austrians couldn’t hold out much longer.

The Turks had already blasted multiple breaches in the walls and the Austrians only barely repulsed them. Image
Read 11 tweets
Oct 12
This kind of take is really only possible in times of comfort and safety (when we live under order created and imposed by strong men).

Anyone with open eyes has probably noticed that the age of comfort and safety that most of us grew up in is already over.
He hedges his words just well enough. "Manhood isn't determined by physical strength"—sure, not exclusively by physical strength.

But he's dancing pretty close to the line of delusional midwittery.
Of course manhood requires physical strength! If you can't protect your loved ones from reasonable levels of threats, what's the point of manhood?
Read 7 tweets
Oct 12
The insufferable self-absorption of Boomer Catholics* prevents them from seeing the obvious truth that, yes, the young actually want reverence and tradition. No one is interested in sissified theology and casualness and acoustic guitars.
We tried it their way, and it drained the Church of vitality. As a result, millions of souls have said "No thanks" and wandered astray, including my brother and cousins and most everyone I went to "religious ed" with. And I have a hard time blaming them too much.
I would say people like John W Farrell need to muster a little bit of humility and shut the hell up. But the truth is they should keep talking because it's comedic and clarifying and it will help accelerate the demise of their lameass vision.
Read 5 tweets
Oct 11
You've challenged Godfrey of Bouillon to a duel. His sword breaks in the middle of the contest. You think you've got him right where you want him. And then...
🧵 Image
A few years before the First Crusade, a nobleman challenged Godfrey to a duel over a territorial dispute and brought his claim to the Holy Roman Emperor, Henry IV. Godfrey attempted to find a less drastic solution, but the man insisted and ultimately so did the Emperor. Image
In the contest, Godfrey struck his opponent’s shield with such force that the blade of his sword broke off six inches above the hilt.

The crowd in attendance tried to halt the duel at that point and seek some sort of compromise.
Read 7 tweets
Oct 4
A man must develop a particular disgust for any tendency in himself toward laziness. Laziness is the most worthless of the sins—maybe not the worst, but the most worthless.

It is a nothingness, a pathetic lack of spirit and desire, a yawn. Image
Aquinas says sloth is "a circumstance of all vices." The slothful man loses the will to strive for good and resist evil; it's too hard, too much work. And so he just shrugs and goes with it. Image
He thus becomes a candidate for doing all sorts of wicked things—and not because wickedness has such a pull, but because he can't see any good reason to resist. Image
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(