The theory for placing 2 carrier strike groups & an amphibious ready group with a marine expeditionary unit in the Middle East is it will deter Iran, Hezbollah, & Syria. @POTUS is visiting to support & reassure Israel, influence its’s ground operations, & deter enemies. But… 1/6
The show of strength & POTUS visit may not be enough of to deter. There’s been an erosion of deterrence. Internal chaos driven but Trumpism, a soft national security policy towards Russia/ insufficient support for Ukraine give our enemies the perception the US won’t act. 2/6
Our enemies have baked in demonstrations as the limits of our actions. The Biden Admin will need to act to make the threat of military force real. There is plenty of Iranian terror infrastructure the U.S. and Israeli can obliterate in a combined operation. 3/6
But it’s unlikely the U.S. will act or will act too late. The pattern from the National Security establishment is pretty clear. They are deterred by fears of escalation and the belief that their actions will be the driver of crisis and further violence. Same as with Ukraine. 4/6
The reality is our enemies see opportunities in our domestic chaos & the slow action of the Admin. For the 20 months of the Ukraine war, they have been calibrated to believe that the US will self-deter. This one consequence of the Afghanistan withdrawal. A fear of action. 5/6
The U.S. will likely need to instantiate its support of Israel. By punishing terror infrastructure, resulting the loss of dozens of U.S. lives, Iran and its Hezbollah proxy would be deterred from sparking a broader regional war. 6/6
BTW. Why isn’t the U.S. taking action to punish the terror networks responsible for killing dozens of Americans?
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Horrible decision by McCarthy @SpeakerMcCarthy preventing @ZelenskyyUa from addressing a joint session of Congress. With that action McCarthy likely extends Russia’s heinous war on Ukraine. Here’s the logic…
One of the drivers of Putin’s decision to invade Ukraine was Trumpism and the authoritarian elements of the Republican Party cheerleading Putin, encouraging the view that Russia could score an easy win. @realDonaldTrump @RonDeSantis @GovRonDeSantis @SenRonJohnson @JDVance1
We’re past easy, but Putin is still trying to figure out how to eckout a win. Putin is unlikely to win on the battlefield with US support, so he’s looking to fellow travelers and useful idiots, the increasingly antidemocratic GOP to deliver the win by cutting support to Ukraine.
Senator @TTuberville’s hold on officer promotions is a disaster. It’s a disaster for children of military families whose parents have made enormous sacrifices to serve in our all-volunteer military. 🧵
Due to the wars, the children of military families have already sacrificed too much and endured years away from their fathers and mothers who have had multiple deployments fighting our nation’s wars.
/2
It’s a disaster for military spouses who have been forced to be single parents and raise children all while under the enormous stress of having their partner at war or on endless deployments.
/3
What is the real risk of extending Ukraine NATO membership? Serious question.
Don’t tell me automatic war because of Article V. It doesn’t work that way.
Russia does not want and cannot handle a war with NATO. Thus, it would not attack the existing members of the alliance.
Would it be bad precedent for NATO to hold Article V plenaries but not take direct military action (i.e. commit troops to Ukraine), maybe. Militarily, NATO could maintain the status quo, support Ukraine w/o sending troops.
But politically, I would kill Russia’s motivation to maintain the war to hold a veto on Ukraine’s membership. Ukraine’s NATO membership under these parameters is arguably better than the status quo, slow burning war with incremental escalation.
In 2008 at the NATO Bucharest Summit, the alliance pronounced that Ukraine & Georgia would eventually join NATO. This was a watered-down empty pronouncement, absent concrete steps, driven by a lack of interest from Germany & France & ineffectual policymaking by the Bush Admin.
NATO both went to far & not far enough with the declaration, witnessing Russia’s response months later with the invasion of Georgia. NATO settled on this approach to placate Eastern Europe, while attempting to avoid provoking Russia/ hoping for a path to cooperation with Russia.
Next month, NATO will hold a historic Summit in Vilnius that will define the alliance for the coming decades. NATO should either recognize that enduring European security and stability entails security guarantees for Ukraine (good policy) or not make any pronouncement on at all.
I covered Belarus for the White House/NSC. Lukashenka, in years past, called the last dictator in Europe, has ruled Belarus since 1994. He’s had other health scares, but this one seems different. The consequences of his death will have a profound impact on Belarus & the region.
In Belarus, where a presidential election in 2020 resulted in months-long large scale protest after Luka stole the election, there will be a regime crisis. The opposition stands a reasonable chance of forcing new elections & at least watering down regime rule.
The existing recognized opposition, in exile, has credible domestic support and could step in to govern. At minimum the next cohort of regime elites will be far weaker than Lukashenka with no good options for external support. Russian support is not a good play for them.
Calls to cut Veterans benefits, earned through blood & sweat & great sacrifices for our country, are outrageous and disgusting. It’s a betrayal of the military & their families.
It’s important to recognize this for what it is: a deliberate, coordinated campaign by the far right.
For years conservative megadonors, the Koch brothers, have funded a campaign to eliminate the Department of Veterans Affairs.
The far right strategy is simple: strip veterans of benefits they’ve earned, then amplify stories about veterans not getting the care they need from the VA as leverage for more calls to cut Veterans benefits. Then privatize veterans care & enrich private healthcare companies.