In Autumn 1116 AD, a dying Alexios Komnenos marched East.
The Turks were once again encroaching on lands he had dedicated his life to returning to the Empire.
The last major battle the Byzantines had fought against the Turks was 45 years ago & 600 miles East; Manzikert.
In the decade of chaos following the battle of Manzikert, Byzantine rule in Anatolia was swept aside as the imperial government convulsed in coups & rebellions. The largely demilitarized population of W. Anatolia surrendered as resistance continued in the better-prepared East.
Alexios Komnenos miraculously stabilized the government by orienting it around his influential & well-connected family. He refused to engage in blood feuds & forgave rebels after swiftly defeating them. Alexios knew he could make no new enemies nor waste any Byzantine men.
Most of Alexios’s early reign was a desperate struggle against the Normans & Pechenegs who threatened to overrun the Balkans. Through diplomatic maneuvering & tenacity Alexios managed to defeat both enemies by the early 1090s.
Alexios’s successes had allowed him to normalize the Empire’s financial & political situation as well as equip a small, professional army of mercenaries & native troops. However, many Byzantine elites were frustrated by Alexios’s lack of effort in recovering their Anatolian homes
To accomplish this Alexios asked for a small mercenary contingent from the Pope. The Pope took this opportunity to unite the squabbling warriors of Western Europe and point them East toward Jerusalem.
Alexios expertly managed this delicate situation & coordinated with these armies to recover much of Western Anatolia from the Turks. With the economic & demographic heartland of the empire recovered, Alexios could focus on more than just survival.
Despite this reconquest, the Turks remained in control of the interior of Anatolia, the steppe-like highlands perfectly suited to their nomadic lifestyle & mounted warfare. These Turks frequently raided Byzantine Anatolia, causing much destruction.
Alexios didn’t have the advantageous geography of his ancestors who used the high peaks of the Taurus Mountains to dampen Arab raids. The hills of Western Anatolia meant a more active defense was needed & Alexios’s armies frequently took the field to beat back Turkish raids.
In 1116 the border war had reached a fever pitch. Alexios, suffering severely from gout & asthma, marched out to thwart a large raid on NW Anatolia which he defeated at Poemanenum. As more & more raiders appeared in the area, Alexios made a bold move.
The emperor led his army into territory controlled by the Turks & turned southwards at Dorylaeum. He ravaged the region, hoping to create a no-man’s land. Alexios also deported the local Greek population to territories controlled by the Empire, a longstanding Byzantine policy.
As Alexios pressed deeper into the interior, swatting away Turkish resistance, the Sultan himself, Malik Shah, was forced to meet him on the field near Philomelion.
The army Malik met was not a rabble of conscripts or conglomerate of mercenary bands, but a disciplined & experienced force welded together by decades of campaigning. Alexios had taken great care to revive Byzantine arms & this generation had grown fierce under his guidance.
Alexios’s men took the field in a formation Alexios himself devised, the parataxis, a square of infantry with cavalry detachments behind & the baggage and Greek refugees in the center. This formation confused the Seljuks & their local commander, Manalugh, attacked hesitantly.
The following day Malik arrived with his army. He pressed the Byzantines aggressively at the front & rear of the parataxis. The Byzantine cavalry counterattacked & a charge under Nikephoros, Alexios’s son-in-law, broke the Turkish force led personally by Malik. The sultan fled.
After narrowly escaping capture, Malik led a night assault. Again, the Byzantine infantry held firm. The following day Malik surrounded the Byzantines & attacked on all sides. His frenetic attacks came to nothing & waves of horse archers broke on the rock of Alexios’s infantry.
Unlike Manzikert where the Byzantines marched haphazardly across the plains in pursuit of the Seljuks, the army took no bait & the cavalry showed great discipline in conducting calculated & limited counter-charges.
Alexios knew the sultan would have to fight & try to eject him from Seljuk lands or else risk losing legitimacy & so adopted a static formation impervious to Turkish strengths.
Malik, unable to dislodge Alexios & suffering casualties in his attempts, sued for peace. Alexios greeted the Sultan warmly, draping him in his own cloak. The Sultan was make every effort to stop Turkish raiding parties on Byzantines & accept a level of subordination to Alexios.
Alexios’s ability to match with impunity through Turkish territory & the iron discipline of his men proved a watershed moment. Byzantine arms were once again dominant in Anatolia, the Turks could be beaten.
The loss of prestige Malik suffered in his surrender led to his deposition & murder by his brother in 1118, the same year Alexios died & left his dream of restoration to his capable son, John.
Alexios’s parataxis formation bears remarkable similarity to the formation Nikephoros Phokas described in the Praecepta Militaria, which he used to great effect against the Hamdanids. Alexios must’ve reconstructed the Byzantine military with Nikephoros’s teachings in mind.
This formation outgrew even Byzantine military theory & Richard Lionheart’s formation during his great victory at Asruf bears surprising similarity to that of these brilliant Byzantine Emperors.
It’s possible crusaders learned these tactics from the Byzantines or by their own experience against the same warriors the Byzantines perfected this strategy against. Some similarity can even be drawn with Tercios & Napoleonic Infantry squares; both under similar pressures.
Alexios’s final battle demonstrated the miracle he had given Byzantium. Where he found a squabbling & dying Empire with hardly a few regiments to call, he left a unified & prosperous one with a capable & disciplined army & an equally capable heir to lead them to greater heights.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
For hundreds of years the “Wild Fields” of the Pontic Steppe, was a battleground. Millions would be driven to the great slave markets of Crimea and sold to a life of misery in the Ottoman Empire.
This brutal conflict birthed the Cossacks, modern Russia, & changed Europe forever.
The medieval steppe of S. Ukraine was controlled by nomads, any settlement was under constant threat by Turkic bands that drove their great herds across the plains.
After the collapse of the Golden Horde in the early 16th c., massive raids were launched into Russia & Ukraine.
Beauplan, a Frenchman residing in 17th century Ukraine remarked on the awful spectacle of the raids, “During the interval of this week-long stop, they bring together all their booty, consisting of slaves and livestock, and divide the entire quantity among themselves. The most inhuman of hearts would be touched to see the separation of a husband from his wife, of a mother from her daughter, there being no hope of their ever seeing each other again. They are to become wretched slaves of Mohammedan pagans, who abuse them atrociously. The brutality [of these Tatars] causes them to commit an infinite number of filthy acts, such as ravaging young girls, raping women in the presences of their fathers and husbands, and even circumcising children before their parents’ very eyes, so that they may be offered to Mohammed.”
Saint-Emperor Nikephoros Phokas dedicated his life to defeating the Muslim Emirates that for centuries had attacked Byzantium.
His success was so complete that the military manual he penned with his brother Leo, the Praecepta Militaria, begins with an apology:
“[The treatise might not offer] much application in the eastern regions at the present time. For Christ, our true God, has greatly cut back the power and strength of the offspring of Ishmael and has repelled their onslaughts…
Nonetheless, in order that time, which leads us to forget what we once knew, might not completely blot out this useful knowledge, we think we ought to commit it to writing…
Today, 570 years ago, Ottoman Janissaries poured over the Theodosian Walls.
The Genoese fled when their leader, Giovanni Giustiniani, was injured. The Emperor threw himself into the hopeless struggle & died with his men.
After over 2,000 years, the Roman Empire was no more.
The final siege of Constantinople is the last chapter in the swan song of the Late Byzantine Empire & a dramatic tale of betrayal, duty, determination, honor, and horror.
In 1449, Emperor John VIII died & his brother Constantine XI took the throne. Crowned in a small ceremony in Mystras, Constantine was never coronated by the Patriarch in Constantinople thanks to his support for a Union with the Papacy, an unpopular movement in Byzantium.
The fact that the Byzantines basically forgot they ruled Sardinia will always be funny to me.
After the Muslim conquest of Sicily, Sardinia was isolated from the rest of the empire. The Byzantines had more pressing matters & through negligence, Sardinia slowly gained a measure of de facto independence.
The Sardinians repelled frequent raids from Sicily & Africa by Muslim pirates. Such attacks forced them to abandon many of the old ports and cities of the coast, further isolating them from the rest of the Byzantines by making the life-line of communication by sailing weaker.
During the reign of Constantine VII, a raiding party from Tarsus attacked the sleepy village of Herakleos.
The villagers were celebrating Divine Liturgy when they received the grave news.
The village priest, Themel, decided to act. That decision would change his life forever.
As Themel prepared the Holy Mystery a messager burst into the church to announce that Muslim raiders had been spotted marching toward the village.
Themel stopped the liturgy and stormed out of the church at the head of his flock, wearing his priestly vestments and armed with a semantron, a big wooden or iron board to hit as a sort of bell.
If you’ve read Ibrahim you’ll know he isn’t a historian; he’s a polemicist. He uses primary sources to weave a narrative of constant, civilizational conflict between Islam & Christianity.
There is no scrutiny of sources or historiography, these are broad strokes to get the scene set for another chapter in a 1,400 year cage match.
If you are looking for Treadgold or Kaldellis here you won’t find him. Ibrahim understands that the Byzantines after Basil II struggled to adapt to new threats, yet is uninterested in the complex political, social, and material causes.