In Autumn 1116 AD, a dying Alexios Komnenos marched East.
The Turks were once again encroaching on lands he had dedicated his life to returning to the Empire.
The last major battle the Byzantines had fought against the Turks was 45 years ago & 600 miles East; Manzikert.
In the decade of chaos following the battle of Manzikert, Byzantine rule in Anatolia was swept aside as the imperial government convulsed in coups & rebellions. The largely demilitarized population of W. Anatolia surrendered as resistance continued in the better-prepared East.
Alexios Komnenos miraculously stabilized the government by orienting it around his influential & well-connected family. He refused to engage in blood feuds & forgave rebels after swiftly defeating them. Alexios knew he could make no new enemies nor waste any Byzantine men.
Most of Alexios’s early reign was a desperate struggle against the Normans & Pechenegs who threatened to overrun the Balkans. Through diplomatic maneuvering & tenacity Alexios managed to defeat both enemies by the early 1090s.
Alexios’s successes had allowed him to normalize the Empire’s financial & political situation as well as equip a small, professional army of mercenaries & native troops. However, many Byzantine elites were frustrated by Alexios’s lack of effort in recovering their Anatolian homes
To accomplish this Alexios asked for a small mercenary contingent from the Pope. The Pope took this opportunity to unite the squabbling warriors of Western Europe and point them East toward Jerusalem.
Alexios expertly managed this delicate situation & coordinated with these armies to recover much of Western Anatolia from the Turks. With the economic & demographic heartland of the empire recovered, Alexios could focus on more than just survival.
Despite this reconquest, the Turks remained in control of the interior of Anatolia, the steppe-like highlands perfectly suited to their nomadic lifestyle & mounted warfare. These Turks frequently raided Byzantine Anatolia, causing much destruction.
Alexios didn’t have the advantageous geography of his ancestors who used the high peaks of the Taurus Mountains to dampen Arab raids. The hills of Western Anatolia meant a more active defense was needed & Alexios’s armies frequently took the field to beat back Turkish raids.
In 1116 the border war had reached a fever pitch. Alexios, suffering severely from gout & asthma, marched out to thwart a large raid on NW Anatolia which he defeated at Poemanenum. As more & more raiders appeared in the area, Alexios made a bold move.
The emperor led his army into territory controlled by the Turks & turned southwards at Dorylaeum. He ravaged the region, hoping to create a no-man’s land. Alexios also deported the local Greek population to territories controlled by the Empire, a longstanding Byzantine policy.
As Alexios pressed deeper into the interior, swatting away Turkish resistance, the Sultan himself, Malik Shah, was forced to meet him on the field near Philomelion.
The army Malik met was not a rabble of conscripts or conglomerate of mercenary bands, but a disciplined & experienced force welded together by decades of campaigning. Alexios had taken great care to revive Byzantine arms & this generation had grown fierce under his guidance.
Alexios’s men took the field in a formation Alexios himself devised, the parataxis, a square of infantry with cavalry detachments behind & the baggage and Greek refugees in the center. This formation confused the Seljuks & their local commander, Manalugh, attacked hesitantly.
The following day Malik arrived with his army. He pressed the Byzantines aggressively at the front & rear of the parataxis. The Byzantine cavalry counterattacked & a charge under Nikephoros, Alexios’s son-in-law, broke the Turkish force led personally by Malik. The sultan fled.
After narrowly escaping capture, Malik led a night assault. Again, the Byzantine infantry held firm. The following day Malik surrounded the Byzantines & attacked on all sides. His frenetic attacks came to nothing & waves of horse archers broke on the rock of Alexios’s infantry.
Unlike Manzikert where the Byzantines marched haphazardly across the plains in pursuit of the Seljuks, the army took no bait & the cavalry showed great discipline in conducting calculated & limited counter-charges.
Alexios knew the sultan would have to fight & try to eject him from Seljuk lands or else risk losing legitimacy & so adopted a static formation impervious to Turkish strengths.
Malik, unable to dislodge Alexios & suffering casualties in his attempts, sued for peace. Alexios greeted the Sultan warmly, draping him in his own cloak. The Sultan was make every effort to stop Turkish raiding parties on Byzantines & accept a level of subordination to Alexios.
Alexios’s ability to match with impunity through Turkish territory & the iron discipline of his men proved a watershed moment. Byzantine arms were once again dominant in Anatolia, the Turks could be beaten.
The loss of prestige Malik suffered in his surrender led to his deposition & murder by his brother in 1118, the same year Alexios died & left his dream of restoration to his capable son, John.
Alexios’s parataxis formation bears remarkable similarity to the formation Nikephoros Phokas described in the Praecepta Militaria, which he used to great effect against the Hamdanids. Alexios must’ve reconstructed the Byzantine military with Nikephoros’s teachings in mind.
This formation outgrew even Byzantine military theory & Richard Lionheart’s formation during his great victory at Asruf bears surprising similarity to that of these brilliant Byzantine Emperors.
It’s possible crusaders learned these tactics from the Byzantines or by their own experience against the same warriors the Byzantines perfected this strategy against. Some similarity can even be drawn with Tercios & Napoleonic Infantry squares; both under similar pressures.
Alexios’s final battle demonstrated the miracle he had given Byzantium. Where he found a squabbling & dying Empire with hardly a few regiments to call, he left a unified & prosperous one with a capable & disciplined army & an equally capable heir to lead them to greater heights.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
There is much debate on how to properly periodize the ~2,200 years of Roman history. I have created a system that I believe works well:
Kingdom (753-509 BC)
Republic:
Early (509-264 BC)
Middle (264-146 BC)
Late (146-27 BC)
Principate (27 BC-235 AD)
Crisis of 3rd Century (235-284 AD)
Dominate (284-602 AD)
Crisis of 7th Century (602-718 AD)
Basilean/Byzantine:
Early (718-867 AD)
Middle (867-1081 AD)
Late (1081-1204 AD)
Interregnum (1204-1261 AD)
Despotate/Palaiologan (1204-1453AD)
Let me explain my reasoning…
Traditional periodization of the Roman State has revolved around political changes, largely the form of government. The use of Kingdom/Republic/Empire(Principate/Dominate) is common and largely uncontroversial. I’ve extended this to 1453 AD. Here’s how I characterize each period.
The Roman Kingdom (753-509BC)
From its semi-mythical founding on the Tiber to the overthrow of the last king, Lucius Tarquinius Superbus; this period deals with Etruscan domination, expanding control over Latium, & the development & maturation of Republican institutions.
I don’t think any other empire has been able to match the Assyrians for their gruesome & terrible proclamations of victory. They sound almost like something an evil alien invader would say in a bad science fiction.
“I rained destruction upon them. I scattered their corpses far and wide, filled the face of the desolate plain with their widespreading armies. With weapons I made their blood to flow down the valleys of the land. The plain was too small to let their bodies fall, the wide countryside was used up in burying them. With their bodies I spanned the Arantu as with a bridge. In that battle I took from them their chariots, their cavalry, their horses, broken to the yoke.”
“With their blood I dyed the mountain red like red wool. Tthe rest of them the ravines and torrents of the mountain swallowed. I carried off captives & possessions from them. I cut off the heads of their fighters and built therewith a tower before their city. I burnt their adolescent bovs & girls."
This hill is not natural, it is the byproduct of thousands of years of human settlement.
A thread on tells.
Primarily found throughout the Fertile Crescent, tells rise from the flat floodplains like small mesas, distinct for their low sloping sides and flat tops. The first residents of these places lived in agricultural communities & towns at the same level as the surrounding area.
However, as time went on refuse, demolished building material, and sediment borne by wind & water accumulated at the sites. Later inhabitants built their homes on top of the remains of those before and slowly the tell rose above the plains.
Once on the shores of the wine-dark Euxine, reaving Vikings established a foothold among the Slavic tribes. These men fought for control of the trade routes of the area, adopted Christianity, & were ruled by a Khagan in the steppe fashion.
A thread on the Rus Khaganate.
A Norse Khagan ruling on the gateway to the steppes, ranging at the head of an armada across the open seas instead of the grass oceans of Eurasia seems too curious to be true & although still shrouded in mystery, the Rus Khaganate is not without precedence.
Ancient Greeks once set up colonies on the north shore of the Black Sea. Ancient sources record that the colonists interacted frequently with the local Scythians, some even adopting many Scythian customs or “going native.”
2,240 years ago, Hannibal Barca met the Roman army on the plains near Cannae.
Outnumbered & deep behind enemy lines, Hannibal displayed his unmatched tactical genius, annihilating the Roman army at the bloodiest day in military history until World War One.
In the 3rd Century BC, the dominant Carthaginians & the rising Roman Republic fought a series of wars for control of the Western Mediterranean. This titanic struggle, named The Punic Wars, spanned decades & set Rome on the path to superpower status.
Carthage, after losing the First Punic War, turned to Iberia to recover its lost fortunes. The Barca family, discovering massive silver deposits & conquering much of the peninsula, helped solidify their power & rejuvenate Carthaginian fortunes. This made Rome uneasy.
Did you know The Last Samurai is based on a true story?
A thread on the incredible life & adventures of the real “Last Samurai;” Jules Brunet.
Jules Brunet was born in Alsace, France in 1838. His father was a veterinary doctor in the army. Jules followed in his father’s footsteps & joined the French Army in 1855, attending the prestigious Saint-Cyr & École Polytechnique.
Although a middling student, Jules excelled at his training as an artilleryman, graduating fourth in his class. Soon after graduating from his artillery course in 1861 he was sent to the war in Mexico. Jules served with distinction as a sub-Lieutenant in the mounted artillery.