Tal Hagin Profile picture
Oct 17, 2023 39 tweets 12 min read Read on X
The strike on the Al-Ahli Arab Hospital in Gaza: Airstrike by the IDF or misfire by Hamas? - Analysis
Image
First, we need to understand something crucial regarding the flow of information during war. War is fast-paced, it is brutal, and information becomes a weapon to be yielded. Fact-checking is almost impossible in real-time, this is a privilege not given during a war.
This leads to Israeli and Palestinian activists and leaders immediately clinging to whatever narrative suits their interests - Regardless if it is true. So, let's look through the information currently available to us almost 6+ hours after the explosion at the hospital.
Fake News (Israeli Activists): Numerous videos, mainly posted by Israeli activists, were alleged to showcase a misfired rocket being the culprit - These videos were from 2021/22 and were irrelevant to this event.
Fake News (Palestinian Activists): Numerous Palestinian activists and organizations stated, without any doubt, that Israel was responsible for the airstrike. This claim was solely based on the reports by the Ministry of Health (governed by Hamas) -Who have vested interests to lie
Timeline:

1. At 19:00 the military wing of Hamas took responsibility for the rockets fired at southern Israel.

It's important to note that both Hamas and the PIJ have very extensive arsenals of rockets.

Image
Image
Image
2. At 19:10 Al Resalah, a television channel reported that "The occupation targets Al-Ahly Baptist Hospital in central Gaza City, causing a large number of injuries"

(This was posted at the same time the PIJ (Palestinian Islamic Jihad) took responsibility for a rocket barrage) Image
3. IDF shelling of targets in the Sheikh Radwan neighborhood was reported at 18:58

4. IDF airstrikes were reported in northern Gaza at 19:12

(No IDF strikes were reported between 18:58 and 19:12)
5. First images from the hospital appear at 19:25.
Image
Image
6. The first video of the strike appears at 19:41. Image
Timeline Confirmed. Now we need to analyze raw footage from a live stream published by @AJEnglish, which is as follows:
This footage takes place at 18:59, directly before Hamas took responsibility for firing, we can see a single rocket fly upwards. Due to the fuel time on the rocket and the explosion, I'd assume this was most likely an R-160. It breaks/blows up at 0:10 and at 0:15 an explosion.
Based solely on this video, there is a high likelihood that this rocket misfired - but its payload was not entirely destroyed, resulting in a devastating explosion.
But how do we know this video showcases the explosion at the hospital?
Based on an OSINT analysis conducted by members of @AbuAliEnglishB1 , they were able to map the location of the explosion and confirm its location due to a unique structure in the video: Solar panels.
But how did it (allegedly) kill so many people?

Image
Image
Image
An additional video of the alleged incident was also investigated by another OSINT account @GeoConfirmed and Twitter users who were able to pinpoint the location of the explosion. Analysis here:
By reviewing graphic images provided by Palestinian channels (which I won't share here) and the OSINT conducted, we can confidently say that the projectile landed in the courtyard of the hospital - where potentially hundreds of refugees had accumulated; resulting in pure carnage.
Conclusion based on current data: A misfired rocket by Hamas/PIJ was responsible for the explosion at the hospital.

As more information presents itself, I will add to this analysis.
UPDATE to the analysis (18/10/2023) - 9 hours after the original analysis was published.

I will be reviewing a number of images from the scene of the explosion at the hospital, as well as analyze other factors and evidence not discussed earlier:
A Photo of the Al-Ahli Arab Hospital in Gaza was published by "Shahab", a news agency located in Gaza.
This photo does not showcase "significant" damage to the hospital, let alone it being "raised to the ground" -but does hint at an explanation for the explosive power witnessed Image
As showcased in the photo, there is no significant crater that is visible - one we'd expect from an airstrike by the IDF. Instead, it appears that the cars hit exploded, particularly these ones. Image
Additionally, I analyzed the (graphic) video of those killed, and was able to pinpoint where it was taken (Yellow):
This courtyard, filled with people, would have been in the direct line of shrapnel from the rocket and exploded cars - resulting in horrific and gruesome injuries
Image
Image
A video, provided by @AbuAliEnglishB1 further proves this. Notice the bread and piles of supplies - further evidence that indicates that a large gathering of people were present during the explosion.
The photo and video both give strength to the hypothesis that a misfired rocket caused this explosion.
Now, let's analyze a number of questions being asked and information being shared:
1# @IDF releases a video of an alleged conversation between a Hamas and PIJ militant that proves they knew it was a misfire.

While this is interesting, I would never fully trust a source from a government body that can't b
corroborated by independent investigators.
2# Alleged Israeli government source that it was an airstrike.
This comes from @HananyaNaftali, who isn't an official source but does work for the IDF socials. He has a long record of making fake posts (Example below), and therefore I don't believe he is a credible source at all

Image
Image
Image
3# The sound of the explosion; with some commentators claiming it to be a JDAM. This does not match the impact zone damage, but an audio analysis of the video is required for further conclusions to be made.
Video of that claim can be found here;
4# Death toll & claims made by Hamas via the Palestinian Ministry of Health:
The current numbers being reported are to be around 500, but the lack of video/photographic evidence raises doubts. I will need to wait for an official count of casualties for further analysis.
5# Reports of the official IDF Arabic facebook page gloating about the casualties.
I proved this to be a fake page yesterday evening:
New conclusion: A misfire from Hamas/PIJ fell into an open courtyard filled with Palestinian refugees - resulting in secondary explosions of vehicles and large dispersions of shrapnel, causing grave injuries. The hospital itself was not directly hit but suffered damage.
UPDATE 3# to the analysis (18/10/2023) - After watching several more videos of the supposed misfire and carefully examining additional evidence, this extension will offer a more comprehensive understanding of what occurred last night.
3 videos of the alleged hospital explosion from Livestream cameras exist from cameras belonging to @AJEnglish, @N12News & 1 unknown sources (Still under review, but possibly also from @N12News ).
Let's review each one:
The first is by @AJEnglish. Previously in this thread, I already showcased that this is the live stream that witnessed the explosion at the hospital.
We see a trail of a missile/rocket right up until impact - not common with regular rockets (Possibly anti-air intercepting it)
The second video was provided by @N12News. It's not the best quality, but the timestamp matches the previous video timestamp. However, there is a barrage of rockets that appear here that aren't in the previous video.
How do we figure out why this is?
Based on the positioning of both cameras, this was where both camera crews (Blue-@AJEnglish / Yellow - @N12News ) were located. Lines indicate where the camera was pointing during the explosion.
It's possible they were not in view, but this explanation isn't satisfactory. Image
A similar video, from the same area as the @N12News (Possibly also theirs) professed to prove an Israeli airstrike was responsible. @Nrg8000 did a great OSINT investigation into disproving this, here:

This video of the alleged explosion first appears at 20:38 on the jeninqassam telegram, over an hour after the initial explosion. I was not able to identify the location to verify it was the cause of the explosion. Thus, until we have an OSINT confirmation - should be ignored.
(1/2) Information available that currently needs further analysis:
1. Video by Al-Jazeera showcases what appears to be a mid-air explosion and less than 5 seconds later the explosion at the hospital: No analysis currently answers this.
2. The currently unconfirmed video of the initial explosion, if confirmed, gives weight to the artillery shell hypothesis.
If confirmed, further analysis of the audio and the courtyard would be needed. Preliminary analysis based on this being correct:
New conclusion based on newly analyzed evidence: The possibility of the explosion being due to an artillery shell, or faulty anti-air has gained some credibility - assuming the initial video is authentic. Currently, the weight of the evidence still points to a Hamas/PIJ misfire.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Tal Hagin

Tal Hagin Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @talhagin

Jul 4
With the publication of the following footage, so to came with it suspicion that it was AI, or at least partially, specifically the second video.

The doubts aren’t unfounded — but after a thorough review, I believe the footage is authentic. Here's why:

A🧵
As AI technology advances, so does our skepticism toward video footage. Visual oddities that were once dismissed as typical artifacts are now increasingly seen as undeniable signs of AI fakery.

So, what raised suspicion in this case? Four main things — but one frame in particular stood out.
The key oddities observers pointed to:

1. Primary focus — the frame where the white vehicles appear to be propelled upward before the explosion.

2. The white cars in front seem to move “casually” forward.

3. The flags don’t react “as they should.”

4. The pedestrians don’t appear to “panic.”

Note: Quotation marks are used to reflect that many of these observations are entirely subjective.Image
Read 15 tweets
Jul 1
A viral claim alleges that over 1,000 Israeli deaths—military and civilian - were exposed via a hack of the Israeli "Hess" website, due to Iranian strikes.

But is there any truth to it—and can we even know, given Israel’s military censorship?

A🧵
The official numbers, per Israeli/Palestinian media (TOI/Maariv/Palestine Chronicle/MOH), cite 29 deaths (28 civilians / 1 off-duty soldier) and 3,000+ injured, but the death toll could rise as there are still several in critical condition (As of June 24th).

Sources:
TOI (They are missing 1 name: Yelena Zadovsky)
timesofisrael.com/these-are-the-…
Maariv:
maariv.co.il/economy/israel…
Palestine Chronicle:
palestinechronicle.com/israeli-media-…
MOH:
gov.il/he/pages/24062…Image
Image
Image
Image
But could they be concealing additional casualties? In theory, yes—but what evidence supports that claim? Very little.

Typically, three points are cited to support the idea:
1. Alleged leaks of Israeli deaths.
2. Aftermath videos showing destruction on a massive scale.
3. Israel’s military censorship.
Read 17 tweets
Jun 30
1. The Times of Israel headline is misleading. If you actually read the article, it's clear they're referring to Iranian casualties.

2. I couldn’t find any Israeli outlet named “Hess,” let alone one reporting those numbers. Image
“Iranian strikes” clearly means Israeli strikes on Iran — just read one sentence past the headline.

Tip: Read articles before you share them. Image
Another few tips:
1. If the OP doesn't provide a source for the claim they make - ignore the claim.
2. If they provide a source - verify it exists.
3. If it exists - verify it says what the OP said.
Read 5 tweets
Jun 25
As news broke of a young child being violently slammed into the ground at Moscow’s Sheremetyevo Airport, so did speculation about the attacker’s identity.

What isn’t confirmed:
Claims that the attacker is Jewish or a Zionist have circulated online without ANY evidence. The only official reference appears in Iran’s Tasnim News Agency, where Ambassador Kazem Jalali stated: “Some have claimed the attacker is Jewish, but I cannot confirm that.”

What we know:
The perpetrator is Vladimir Vitkov, 31, a Belarusian national, returning from Egypt, where he had been working on a construction project. He was reportedly under the influence of whisky and cannabis at the time of the assault.Image
Image
Image
Image
This is a good time to remind everyone of the Ben Cohen case - which led to an innocent man being harassed for a crime he didn't commit because people were desperate to paint a narrative that fit their agendas - trying to claim the perpetrator was either Israeli/Jewish/Illegal Immigrant/Muslim:
Make no mistake: Those who rush to fill an information void by assigning blame without evidence aren’t seeking justice — they’re exploiting a tragedy.

They do NOT care about this child.
Read 7 tweets
Jun 19
In a renewed attempt to claim that Soroka Hospital wasn’t directly hit—but was instead damaged by a shockwave after targeting two alleged military facilities—a new video has been released.
Just like previous “evidence,” it’s wrong: The roof of Soroka’s Surgical Ward was directly struck, and the supposed military sites are not located where the video claims.

Thread 2.0:Image
The Claim:
This video repeats the same narrative, but instead of a fake map, it now shows a 3d image of Soroka Hospital in Beer Sheva —while still insisting the location is in Tel Aviv.

The translated claims are:
1. “Central Command of Communications, Control and Intelligence of the Israeli Army”
2. “Central Intelligence Building – Israeli Army Operations in Tel Aviv's Gav Yam Technology Park”

This is false.
1. No military site in Be'er Sheva is named the "Central Command of Communications, Control and Intelligence" – there is the IDF Technology Campus, but it's in a completely different location.
2. The Gav Yam Technology Park is also located in a completely different place.

Here is map showcased in our previous thread, geolocation exactly where the Southern Command, C4i HQ, and Gav Yam Technology Park are:
x.com/talhagin/statu…Image
Read 10 tweets
Jun 19
After the blast at Soroka Hospital, Fars News claimed it was just shockwave damage from nearby military targets. This is False.

The hospital was directly hit, and the map they shared to back up their claims was completely fabricated.

An OSINT Analysis by @FakeReporter :Image
Be aware that this analysis uses open-source tools, including geolocation, blast triangulation and publicly available information online - Nothing said here is confidential.
The Claim:
FARS responded to reports that the hospital was directly hit by presenting a map and asserting that the hospital was not struck. According to their claim, any damage resulted from a nearby impact and was caused by the shockwave.Image
Image
Image
Read 15 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(