@bmj_latest @NPEU_UKOSS The BMJ article itself is just an opinion piece from a freelance journalist, basically repeating the party line - that only unvaccinated pregnant women died of COVID.
The truth is that there was a sharp rise in direct deaths in the 2019-2021 triennium, unrelated to "COVID", that Oxford conveniently are not talking about.
Look over here (COVID and vaccines)...
not here (basic maternity care)
The truth:
Direct causes of death, those considered to be pregnancy related, spiked massively in the last two years of the report.
Eye off the ball.
Too busy making tiktok videos.
A massive 52% rise in direct maternal deaths.
@bmj_latest @NPEU_UKOSS And here it is.
This is #ECMOgate and #3tablets scandals in one.
"An unvaccinated woman".
No antibiotics for pneumonia.
Perform an abdominal operation during an acute respiratory illness.
Death 3 weeks later, by definition cannot be "COVID pneumonitis". Virus long gone.
@bmj_latest @NPEU_UKOSS No lessons learnt.
Antivirals don't work for bacterial pneumonia.
No mention of hydroxychloroquine or immune modulators for early pneumonitis prevention.
No mention of antibiotics for early treatment of pneumonia.
Wait till you can't breathe.
#3tablets
@bmj_latest @NPEU_UKOSS No early treatment for these unfortunate souls.
Just wait until you can't breathe.
If you declined the vaccine that doesn't prevent death or infection, we won't treat you. We will use you to convince the population that the vaccine would have worked.
@bmj_latest @NPEU_UKOSS This is appalling propaganda covering for potential mismanagement.
"We won't release the data behind this report, or allow an independent audit of why 45 young women (who should not have died) died of COVID - but we are going to tell you that vaccine hesitancy killed them"
@bmj_latest @NPEU_UKOSS This is a dark day in the history of the UKOSS maternal mortality reports. The first time ever that politics has reared its ugly head and the consequences are a 52% rise in direct maternal deaths, and an unknown number of unnecessary COVID deaths.
@bmj_latest @NPEU_UKOSS Here is the link to the formal report.
At some point there will need to be a full and independent audit of the management of those 45 young women who died of "COVID"
The first reason is that all the infected people apparently were infected at the same time. There was no spread (with 2-3 day incubation) between them. And no further contagion reported from that group...
Put your hand up if you think that using a biological system derived from the only organism that thrives at 100 degrees celsius (pyrococcus furiosus)...
to generate synthetic viral spike proteins...
Here is just one of the most ridiculous graphs I have ever seen in a paper.
The "Dose 2 > 180 days" group had the exact same mortality rate. So the "vaccine efficacy" in this group was 34%. With tight confidence intervals.
Not a chance.
But it gets worse!
The "unvaccinated" death rate drops by half in the second half of the year....
Whilst the "Dose 2 8-90 days" quadruples in the same time frame, yet designated as a "13.9% efficacy"
When you understand that the patients in the Pfizer vaccine trials did not have their "COVID" diagnosed on the basis of the swab that they sent in, it should become clear how the result was obtained. files.catbox.moe/pikoi0.pdf
To reiterate.
If you were in the trial and had COVID symptoms, you took your own swab and sent it into to Pfizer at Pearl River, who then sent it to Wuhan.
The COVID case was not recorded in the trial on the basis of your local test (e.g. with your GP)