4/The engagement of 4 cruise missiles and 19 UAVs with SM-2s presents a concern regarding the ability of a modern warship to remain in the fight due to ammunition expenditure.
Carney has 90 vertical launch system cells (VLS). 23 targets would require multiple standard missiles.
5/If Carney is the sole US destroyer presence in the area, then an shooting down 23 missiles/UAVs may have greatly depleted if not exhausted her armament; known as going Winchester.
6/In the past, the @USNavy would have destroyer tenders forward deployed to not just provide maintenance for ships, but to reload warships - principally destroyers. But the US decommissioned its last destroyer tender in 1996.
@USNavy 7/While the @usnavy has prioritized the ability to reload VLS cells, the nature of the tubes require the ships to be in calm water at anchor or pierside and it is time consuming. As of yet, no method has been developed to reload VLS at sea.
@USNavy 8/This event should give concern about potential swarm attacks on ships and the limitations that modern vessels have to defend themselves against such threats.
While these weapons were targeted at Israel and not Carney, it is still a lesson that needs to be driven home.
9/US Destroyer Carney Shoots Down Land Attack Missiles | What is the US Navy Strategy in Israel-Hamas
10/Some great discussion on this topic.
We don't know the load out of Carney's 90 VLS cells. SM-2s take up an individual cell, but she is also an Ballistic Missile Defense (BMD) ship so may have SM3s & SM6s onboard.
Evolved Sea Sparrow Missiles (ESSM) are quad packed in cell.
11/The impetus of the thread is what happens when a VLS armed ships expends its ordnance and possibly depletes its main long range anti-air weapons.
While we have reloaded missiles at sea in the past, these were launchers with magazines, largely.
12/We have loaded VLS at sea and there were plans as far back as the 80s to outfit Burkes with that capability but the logistics of removing and returning spent canisters became an issue.
13/Others, such as @cdrsalamander have been highlighting this issue for years
The Return of at Sea Reloads: The Big Importance of Small Things
July 2017
1/The @Heritage has released Project 2025 which is entitled Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise. Basically it would be the next Trump administration policy guide. In it is a section on Maritime Policy (p.637-638). Let's take a moment and digest it.
2/A little short on history as MARAD came from the US Shipping Board created in 1916 and then via the US Maritime Commission.
What is also omitted is that MARAD was originally under the Commerce Dept and included @FMC_gov it is purview.
3/This statement is 💯% the wrong choice. While they are correct that MARAD does not regulate its industry, it makes no argument to transfer it to @DHSgov.
MARAD should be reorganized into an entity that has oversight of all maritime aspects, akin to the FAA over aviation.
A temporary jetty was constructed from concrete and landfill to extend out from the shore.
It was done under the supervision of the IDF.
2/The Spanish-flagged tug Echo 1 Open Arms delivered the barge of 200 tons of food from @WCKitchen via Cyprus.
Due to the shallow draft off the jetty the tug could not push the barge alongside.
This is why the US Army Trident pier will extend approximately 1800 feet out.
3/The barge was maneuvered by the use of two small RHIBs.
This is extremely difficult and danger due to the mass of the barge and the power of the RHIBs. Any current or wind would have precluded this operation.
2/According to the @DeptofDefense spokesperson it will take two weeks to construct.
Okay...but where are the causeways?
They are either in Virginia or onboard prepositioning ships at Diego Garcia or in the western Pacific.
These will need to be shipped and this takes time?
3/Also, the throughput of a barge ferry is ridiculously slow. While this may be enough to sustain a few hundred or thousand soldiers in an exercise, the population of Gaza is over 2 million.
This is going to require a lot of cargo to move quickly and efficiently.
1/A quick snapshot of all containerships over 16,000 TEUs (or Ultra Large Container Vessels). You can see that they are used exclusively between Europe & Asia as US ports cannot accommodate them, either due to water/air draft or crane capacity.
2/Only a few ports can handle them - Tangier in Africa; Algeciras, Genoa, Piraeus, Istanbul, Port Said & Gioia Tauro in the Med; Hamburg, Bremerhaven, Rotterdam, Antwerp, Felixstowe & Antwerp in Northern Europe & in Asia, multiple ports in China, Singapore, Columbo & Khalifa.
3/Noticeably missing are any US ports - on either the East, Gulf or West Coasts.
The Ultra Large Container Vessels (ULCV) were built to just fit in the Suez, hence 399.99 meters in length.
But now with the diversion caused by the #Houthi, questions arise about the ULCVs.
1/MT Marlin Luanda, a 110,000 deadweight ton tanker and owned by a company in the Marshall-Is and flagged in the same, sailed from Greece after loading a cargo of Russian naphtha from tankers via the Black Sea.
The cargo was not sanctioned and sold under the price cap.
2/The ship identified its destination as Singapore but that was probably not its final one.
Over the past year, it has operated over an extensive area, typical of Suezmax/LR2 tanker.
3/The ship has a valuation of $61.3M and its cargo of naphtha was probably similar. A value of $120 million would lead to a war risk of approximately $1.2M for the ship if at 1%.