And why the NYAG's request will force a sale of Grayscale.
2/ The Enron fraud involved the use of off-balance sheet special purpose entities (SPEs) to hide debt and inflate profits.
Enron executives engaged in self-dealing transactions.
The NYAG alleges DCG did both of these...and more.
3/ Through complex financial structures, Enron was able to disguise its true financial state, misleading investors and analysts.
DCG did the same (later), but took it to another level
4/ While many of Enron's transactions were technically within the legal boundaries, the aggregate manipulation of these transactions was the fraud.
Enron exploitated accounting loopholes and got auditors and bankers to sign off.
5/ The difference is DCG flat out falsified their statements, withheld material information, withheld disclosure, and lied to its own staff and customers about its cutomer health.
There were no loopholes with the DCG fraud.
6/ DCG and Genesis knew the latter was insolvent. But both parties sought to portray 'business as usual' and a 'well capitalized status'
7/ Genesis "concealed disclosure" of financials for many months despite requests from customers and Gemini.
The CFO refused to join customer calls. Instead, the front-line was provided with talking points to perpetuate the deception
8/ DCG "raided the Genesis piggy bank using customer funds to finance itself.
DCG directed its subsidiary to re-finance its own loans multiple times and dictated terms.
This action deepened the Genesis negative equity hole.
9/ The NYAG complaint is Civil in nature. But the complaint alleges @BarrySilbert and execs broke multiple criminal laws, repeatedly.
10/ The NYAG shows thru multiple pieces of evidence that Silbert directed the fraud from DCG.
Silbert: "We can't allow people inside our outside to question Genesis solvency"
11/ Pair that note from DCG's CEO with the Genesis CEO saying: "If we're able to show our balance sheet after all of that happened and it still looks strong...people will care less about losses"
That’s not how it works.
You show the balance sheet as-is.
12/ Here's more evidence of Barry Silbert directing Genesis.
"We received guidance from [ Silbert ] to re-paper the $100 Loan...we will do what DCG needs us to do."
DCG also set the interest rate and terms.
13/ DCG's Head of Communications and COO were drafting tweets for Genesis CEO (Moro) - and advising that he send it off his personal twitter
14/ On the Promissory Note
DCG never "assumed the liability" contrary to public statements.
The Promissory Note was material, self-directed and concealed the truth - it was intended to deceive and mislead.
That’s fraud.
15\ DCG started talking about "Duration Mismatch" in its November letter to investors and 'crypto volatility' as the cause for its woes.
I called this deception out back in November after the DCG shareholder letter:
2/ Disclosure: I am not a lawyer, and I am not your advisor.
I am not a party to the dispute and have no commercial or customer relationship with Genesis, Gemini, or DCG.
You should retain legal counsel and an advisor to work thru this complex plan.
3/ There are a lot of brass knuckle threats at work here in this negative sum negotiation game.
Example: Genesis is saying they will waive 'preference claims' - meaning anyone that withdrew within 90 days of bankrtupcy will not be clawed back if they vote Yes.