I don't tilt toward the Palestinians in their dispute with Israel. And I'm not anti-Zionist.
But the bias in this @Quillette piece is pretty remarkable.
Two sentences really stand out.
First one: "Pinpointing the origin of the Arab-Jewish conflict is not easy."
No, pinpointing the origin actually couldn't be easier: Hundreds of thousands of Jews moved in a fairly short period of time from Europe to the Levant and then created an independent state against the objections of the centuries-long majority of the population.
Then this: "Jews... had maintained a nearly uninterrupted presence since the destruction of the second Jewish Commonwealth in 70CE."
This of course doesn't mention the fact that for about 500 years prior to modern Zionism, Jews were only about 3% of the population of the area (see graph in tweet below).
I don't understand why it's necessary to distort or leave out history just because you've picked one of the sides. You can support Israel's right to exist and still acknowledge that the Palestinians were screwed by Zionism and have every right to their rage.quillette.com/2023/10/21/its…
People in the replies telling me I'm "wrong" and then providing info that doesn't relate to the two specific points I made.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Black people in America commit wildly disproportionate amounts of violent crime, and the government statistics on this crime rarely if ever get reported in the media.
I also talk about the scientifically-established (and scientifically-uncontroversial) group differences in IQ, and the effect these have on group outcomes in the US.
Full-scale East Asian-American IQ: 105+
White: 100
African-American: 85
1/ Richard Hanania has not yet responded to this long, detailed and explosive piece alleging he's used a pseudonym to pen hundreds of incendiary — "racist" and "sexist," according to HuffPost — online comments over the years.
2/ HuffPost alleges that Hanania used the name "Richard Hoste" to express "support for eugenics and the forced sterilization of 'low IQ' people," opposition to "race-mixing” (Hoste called it "shameful"), and to argue that "Black people cannot govern themselves."
3/ Hoste is also quoted as claiming that women "didn't evolve" to be decision-makers and non-white immigrants from Latin America should leave the US, among other provocative ideas.
This mentally disordered basement-dwelling slug is responsible for smearing dozens of honest scholars and damaging the careers of people like Noah Carl and Bo Winegard. He attacks almost anyone who touches the subject of race and IQ.
Meet Oliver D. Smith.
Smith started out as a neo-Nazi, but after being tossed out of every racist online user group, he careened to the other end of the horseshoe so that he could take his revenge.
In other words, he went from being a creep to being another kind of creep.
I highly recommend the article. It details Smith's sordid and despicable history, his extreme obsessiveness and total lack of conscience, and his inability to behave in a reasonable manner. His self-admitted mental health issues can't fully explain his behavior.
1/ The most perfect (and almost unbelievable) metaphor for affirmative action: The lives of Allan Bakke (a white guy who challenged racial quotas at UC Davis) and Patrick Chavis (a black guy admitted to UC Davis under affirmative action the year Bakke was rejected).
2/ After Bakke won his SCOTUS case in 1978 (which ended the use of *overt* racial quotas in university admissions), he finally was accepted at UC Davis medical school. He graduated and eventually began practicing medicine. He kept a low profile, and didn't give interviews.
3/ Years later, the NY Times, still stinging from Bakke's victory, published a long and glowing account of a “thriving” black UC Davis medical school graduate named Patrick Chavis, noting how he had benefited from the school's old affirmative action quota system.
1/ Over the more than 50 years affirmative action's morally squalid and racist practices were in place, how many white and Asian applicants were denied admission in favor of less qualified black and Hispanic applicants? I was likely one of them, and maybe you were, too.
2/ Years ago, I applied to a top law school, and was rejected.
My GPA: 0.3 points higher than average GPA of blacks admitted
My LSAT: Higher than the average at this school
Average LSAT of blacks admitted: MUCH lower than my score and the white average
3/ My undergrad degree: In a program ranked #1 in nation.
Also: I had received academic awards, had a book published by an academic imprint as an undergrad, had glowing recommendations from well-known scholars.