And #NIHgate explains how the @NIH knew about the risk but instead of raising the alarm, they sent their thugs in to suppress the paper that showed the risk of #lymphoma after COVID mRNA vaccination.
Hi @peterdaszak now that I have your attention why did Alice Latinne hide those viral sequences from your 2019 Nature paper, and where did the GP-120 sequences come from?
Asking for 6.9m people who can't, because they died.
@bmj_latest @NPEU_UKOSS The BMJ article itself is just an opinion piece from a freelance journalist, basically repeating the party line - that only unvaccinated pregnant women died of COVID.
The first reason is that all the infected people apparently were infected at the same time. There was no spread (with 2-3 day incubation) between them. And no further contagion reported from that group...
Put your hand up if you think that using a biological system derived from the only organism that thrives at 100 degrees celsius (pyrococcus furiosus)...
to generate synthetic viral spike proteins...
Here is just one of the most ridiculous graphs I have ever seen in a paper.
The "Dose 2 > 180 days" group had the exact same mortality rate. So the "vaccine efficacy" in this group was 34%. With tight confidence intervals.
Not a chance.
But it gets worse!
The "unvaccinated" death rate drops by half in the second half of the year....
Whilst the "Dose 2 8-90 days" quadruples in the same time frame, yet designated as a "13.9% efficacy"