Part of what makes Saka different to/better than most more explosive wingers is because his brain is that of a midfielder's.
He may get past his man a bit less but each ball reception for him is an opportunity to create/continue offensive momentum rather than purely best his man
Basically, Saka makes the perfect decision each time he faces up his man. He's built to interpret the situation correctly, whether to come inside or slip someone in or slip someone out or shoot or cross or combine or take it past his man or find a man in zone 14 or pass it back.
He's basically a perfect little all-rounder with enough ability to do everything, the intelligence to see it and the swagger to execute it.
Take his decisive moment against France at the World Cup when he won the penalty vs the decisive moment against United at home last season.
One was a combine/carry through that Tchouameni fell for. The other was your typical Arjen Robben move. Then you've got his moment against Chelsea this season, too, a cut in and cross to the backpost.
The variety of plays he can develop is absolutely incredible.
If you think about it, the only winger who can match the variety of plays that Saka can develop is Mohammed Salah. From any range, into anywhere, through any means.
Meanwhile, people underrate both massively as wingers.
Look into the past and the wingers who can do the same are
vanishingly few.
Ribery, Neymar, Messi... maybe Robben/Mahrez... Who else?
Bukayo is up there with these legends with the variety of staple plays at his beck and call to affect a game. That is why their teams run the game through these players. They are essentially magicians.
Not to mention that when Saka gets past you 1v1, it is a more dangerous situation than when a Doku does. He is going to put it literally on a plate at a higher percentage.
Your ASMs, Martinellis, Comans, Dokus, Costas can be extremely erratic with their deliveries after the fact
Imagine Bukayo in these situations after the fact. There's no guarantee of a goal but it would look a lot more dangerous on average than these.
this affects how they carry & use the ball, execute & respond under pressure and learn new things & expand capacity/responsibility
think Messi and Salah evolutions
—Body: (compactness, balance, coordination)
this affects how they can receive and where they can receive it, the capacity to turn either way AFTER placing a foot on the ball with their back against the opposition (this is not the half-turn), what angles they can sell (the
more balanced their proportions and the more proportionately compact the overall profile, the better) mostly after receiving central.
this balanced proportioning & compactness suggests you can go either way & forces oppo to hesitate back to goal and facing forward on the carry
This goal is impossible without the second of hesitation Saka has on the ball, which also forces the defender to hesitate, and then which gives Saka the turn.
It needs pausa and a balanced body type to consistently execute. Sancho has both qualities, too
Brain gives Saka the inspiration to be patient on the ball, compactness gives him strength in case he is charged, his balance sells the illusion to go either way and the angle to exploit is created.
Ribery, Sancho, Messi... all of them can sink on the ball and turn.
These are some of the invisible qualities non explosive wingers have that do not catch the eyes of the average fan.
The ‘Magician’ profile is uninspiring because it isn't too flashy until they arrive on the pitch and consistently pull out results.
They are not understood.
Barcelona have produced the latest of them.
A winger with the brain, technical consistency and range to completely run an attack and produce an infinite number of scenarios to solve it.
Maybe you can stop Doku with Wan Bissaka, but God help you when it is Yamine Lamal.
The End
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
For many years, I thought not having access to WyScout was a limitation on my dreams to become the best scout around. I made do with maximizing what I could from comps and glimpses.
This is the unknown story of how I turned my disadvantage into a breakthrough career 🧵/
In 2020, I was rustling with ambition and energy.
I had read everything I could find on football, from Spielverlagerung articles to Stop Bunching blogposts to StatsBomb pieces. I had gained a marvelous technical background.
I understood the theory, I knew football—on paper.
But I had one problem: turning theory into actionable insight by watching games and players.
I was in university. I couldn’t watch every game live. There wasn’t even access to most leagues beyond the top ones. I needed a way to watch players beyond those.
—I was the first to sound the alarms on INEOS with detailed explanation. I remember United tacticos trying to defend them because of hope & big names. My insight goes beyond players.
(a thread)
—I announced Arne Slot as a T3 coach in the league via his presence before any game was played and a worthy rival to Mikel Arteta and Pep Guardiola. My insight goes beyond ordinary analysis.
I don't do too many predictions anymore because they have served their usefulness as a tool for me, but these are two of the major unfolding narratives in the EPL covered above.
Henry's narrative that Arsenal are trying to not lose the title while Liverpool are attacking it is wrong.
It is a narrative that assumes player quality = manager intentions, which is one of the common fundamental errors of team analysis.
1/
Fans and analysts too often give overwhelming responsibility to the manager for player decisions, quality and luck.
The other argument is that coaches ‘build’ teams and ‘buy’ players so they must yet hold some responsibility for the kind of team they have.
This is also a fundamentally flawed argument.
Coaches, no matter how powerful in modern football, rarely get full say in signings. There is, usually, a transfer committee where interests between the coaching staff, executive management and financial officiers are balanced.
There are too many bad arguments. Perfect preservation when you are relying on documentation by memory is obviously not even possible (unless Allah somehow miraculously made it so).
Then we have various extant manuscripts that doesn't align with the standard Uthman code.
If you claim that all of this is from God, then even slight variations in style, pronunciation, punctuations, much less entire words are necessarily lethal to the claim of divinity. It shows that human error & interference was possible at least in documentation and transmission.
This is all the difference between Pep Guardiola and Mikel Arteta.
Pep adapts his game model to his player's qualities, especially the forwards. Mikel uses Vieira and Martinelli in the same way as Bukayo Saka. Talent maximization is not completely there, yet.
Although, there's something to be said about the fact that the only big distances runner Arsenal have is Gabriel Martinelli, so that's a good argument for not tweaking the game model enough to suit him.
However, he's a regular & you're meant to get the best out of your regulars.
Part of it is also the fact that Martinelli doesn't have Jesus, a frequent rotator, available. This is why I still don't blame Mikel Arteta much. Because everything can be explained.
For me, however, what cannot be explained is Vieira playing like Bukayo in a friendly