AJ Leonardi, MBBS, PhD Profile picture
Oct 23 11 tweets 4 min read Twitter logo Read on Twitter
As we are hit with yet another Covid wave, I want to reflect on the promises of herd immunity by infection, with special consideration of claims that pre-existing cross-reactive T cell immunity to other coronaviruses was aiding in achieving the herd-immunity threshold
These two circumstances are not unrelated. The reason we are having constant reinfection with sars cov 2 is because we gave the virus the keys to the kingdom: enough replication to enable evolution to escape key parts of our immune systems
In 2020, I warned that resting hopes of herd immunity on T cell immunity was perilous and a bad idea. I said it would enable mutations and evolution of the virus to the extent to facilitate reinfection. Now, this is our reality.
In 2020, the prevailing thought was that pre-existing T cell immunity was contributing to a herd immunity threshold. I claimed it was absolutely in no way doing this. They also thought that SARS 1 immunity was lifelong so then sars cov 2 would be similar.
Because people thought immunity would be durable, there were many who wanted people to catch sars cov 2 and get it over with. This sentiment was described by Jonathan Howard's book "we want them infected" blog.petrieflom.law.harvard.edu/2023/04/25/we-…
The quote is from a US government official who described how they wanted kids to be infected to reach a herd immunity threshold which would halt viral transmission. Again, I claimed this was folly, as kids were not seroconverting and would thusly reinfect
Evidence also emerged that sars 2 had a fibrotic effect on the heart, and special attention was given to football players who were infected. Trump was concerned about reelection, so aided a campaign to negate fears and proclaimed, "I brought back football"
Now in 2023 nearing 2024, reinfections are our reality and our life expectancy is dwindling. Meanwhile, because workers are getting disabled more often and are needed, retirement age is being increased. nature.com/articles/s4156…
In my opinion, this is the biggest health policy failure in the 21st century. The USA is not the only guilty country here, other countries aimed to "take it on the chin" and believed herd immunity would be achieved
It is also the failure of every immunologist who believed or allowed fruitless rhetoric of herd immunity by infection to parade around unchecked. You failed to anticipate sars cov 2 reinfecting and becoming the third major cause of death. cdc.gov/media/releases…
All I hope is that in the future we will not reward and pursue human rights infringements such as the facilitation of infection of the youth with a novel coronavirus. Unfortunately, there are those in academia where it is argued that infection with sars cov 2 is good for kids.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with AJ Leonardi, MBBS, PhD

AJ Leonardi, MBBS, PhD Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @fitterhappierAJ

Oct 14
Since 2020 I have claimed that sars cov 2 infection would create harmed t cell memory based on phenotypes after infection

It is now proven

Even so, I have several Professors who pretend to not understand or do not understand how, nipping at my heels

I assume they behave this way because they are tenured & very mad, so they feel they can put their ignorance and vitriol on display wantonly

Bertoletti even made a nod to me in a publication, which the journal maintains references me in no way whatsoever


Image
Image
For their benefit, I will list the publications that prove my thesis correct:

The first is how T cell responses derived from vaccination are superior to those derived from infection. T cell functions after infection were harmed. The publication is below:
Read 10 tweets
Sep 15
1) Senior immunologists said I was wrong that infections posed the risk of widespread T cell exhaustion and called it "twitter nonsense"

2) They said I was wrong that the experience in severe disease shared the spectrum of mild disease, despite sharing mechanism
3) They said I was wrong about Fas-mediated apoptosis

4) They said I was wrong that reinfections would continue to hyperactivate T cells

5) They said I was wrong about the prospect of rapid evolution and antigenic escape
6) They said I was wrong that ace2 affinity would increase after Omicron

7) They said I was wrong that covid harmed the immune system

8) They said I was wrong that immune dysregulation underlies Long Covid
Read 5 tweets
Aug 4
The virus has not turned into an ordinary illness

Symptoms are from the immune response and appreciated grossly (eg cough, chills, headache, fever)

Pathophysiology tells a different tale of effects Cov2 has that ordinary illnesses don't

🧵
For example, even extreme lethal cases of flu do not send T cells into the brain

SARS Cov 2 does

https://t.co/gxSHkoJ5Z1nature.com/articles/s4158…
Image
Scientists examined T and B cell changes after infection with normal viruses versus covid.

Only Covid, not the normal viruses, caused missing unactivated naive T and B cells Image
Read 6 tweets
Jun 10
The claim Long Covid rates would reduce upon reinfections were made by Iwasaki, Zeynep, and others

When I said I believed the opposite I was derided and mocked

Three studies now show increasing rates of Long Covid on reinfection

🧵

ImageImageImageImage
I was mocked as not a subject matter expert by the established in the field like Rupert Beale. Zeynep would tag 15+ immunologists below me

Before I was mocked as "not Galileo" because I claimed there would be no herd immunity to Covid before Omicron
Image
It’s strange that experts went on record saying reinfections would result in lower rates of Covid

I would have to reduce the considerations of what creates long Covid into a maybe 12 kB string of thought in order to make the same conclusion
Read 7 tweets
Jun 4
Hello

I am the only person who said there would likely be increased rather than decreased rates of long covid upon reinfection due to cumulative effects on the immune system and organs

Several studies recently corroborated this
Recently, I made a statement that lifetime rates of long Covid would be over 99.9%.

Most people erroneously took this as a Percentage of the population affected, which it would not be

Some people would get long Covid several times others, not at all
This is easy to understand, however, some people that do not understand it have very strong opinions

This led me to realise that in instances where precise language and proper conceptualization are necessary, especially when things are counterintuitive, one will stand outside
Read 6 tweets
May 28
Both Ladhani's and the NIH's Long Covid studies show the idea that Long Covid probability goes down with reinfection because your "immune system fortifies with exposure" is false

This was yet another piece of wishful thinking that I stood against

nytimes.com/2022/08/12/opi…
1/7 Image
You may remember when reinfections were claimed unlikely, and immunity would be lifelong similar to SARS 1

I claimed it was possible sars2 would mutate quickly out of it

This is yet another example of being overly optimistic and not accounting for facets of sars cov2

2/7
This presents a great challenge to society and its people at large

With similar rates of LC between infection and reinfection, the tally of people too ill to work steadily increases

What it means for you is that it could be more likely than not that you get Long Covid soon

3/7
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(