David Slack Profile picture
Oct 23 17 tweets 3 min read Twitter logo Read on Twitter
Since the CEOs walked away from negotiations with SAG-AFTRA on Oct. 11, the AMPTP and Molly Levinson’s unionbusting crisis PR firm have been spinning out nothing but propaganda and outright lies.

With negotiations resuming tomorrow, it’s time to set the record straight.🧵
MINIMUMS:

SAG-AFTRA is seeking a significantly larger increase in minimums than the WGA and DGA got. But there are good reasons for that.

First, a 5% increase after 2 years of 6+% inflation isn’t a raise at all — it’s a pay cut.
The WGA got enough increases in other areas to compensate for the 5% increase in our deal. But SAG-AFTRA is a different union with different needs.

And performers *need* a significant increase in minimums.
For example, here’s what a writer, director, and actor in a major guest star role get paid on a 1 hr streaming show:

Writer: $31,812
Director: $25,432
Actor: $3,756/wk

And they rarely work more than 2 weeks.

Still think they don’t need a big increase in minimums?
REVENUE SHARING / SUCCESS-BASED RESIDUALS:

Like the WGA, SAG-AFTRA members are seeking additional compensation for their work on the most successful shows in streaming. This kind of reward for success has a long and successful history in linear TV and movies.
For decades, we had a system where hit movies and TV shows continued to pay residuals to the actors, writers, and directors who worked on them. And pension & health payments for crew members were based on these residuals.

It was a good system that incentivized great work.
But in the streaming era, actors on huge hit shows that bring millions of subscribers to a streaming platform get paid the same low rate as those on a show that flops. Streamers have gutted the incentive to do great work and denied their top performers a fair share of success.
The new WGA contract addresses this with a bonus residual for the most successful shows.

SAG-AFTRA has a different proposal tailored to their needs, commonly refered to as Revenue Sharing or Rev Share.
SAG-AFTRA’s initial ask was 2% of a streaming show’s contributions to revenues. When CEOs balked, the negcom cut their ask in half, to 1% — and shifted to percentage per subscriber.

This was a clear, good faith effort on SAG’s part to make a deal. The CEOs stormed out anyway.
And since walking out, the streamers have tried to misrepresent this good faith compromise as a “tax” on their subscribers.

It’s only a tax if streamers pass this cost onto consumers by raising rates (again) instead of taking the cost out of their $30 billion/year in profits.
SAG-AFTRA performers have *always* survived on revenue sharing — but streamers didn’t factor that cost into their business model.

Actors pour their hearts and souls into streaming shows with the promise of “we’ll cut you in later.”

Well, now is the time.
AI:

This one is simple. For WGA writers, the threat of AI was largely hypothetical — a way they might abuse us in the future.

For SAG-AFTRA members, the threat of AI is here now.
Voice actors are having their voices stolen. Background actors are being paid once and scanned for reuse in perpetuity throughout the universe. Stunt performers can have their stunts captured — and its the last time they’ll get paid even if the company uses their stunt forever.
The threat of AI is existential both for SAG-AFTRA as a union and for performers as professionals. This issue is now or never.

SAG-AFTRA leaders are right to hold the line for AI protections — because if they don’t win this fight now, 2026 will be too late.
SAG-AFTRA members — along with everyone in the industry — are understandably eager for the strike to end. We all want to get back to work in the business we love.

But seeing the issues above, can anyone blame them for holding the line to get what they need?
There will always be those union members who put their personal wants over the needs of fellow members, who will urge union leaders to take “any deal as long as it’s now.”

The WGA has a few. I’m sure SAG-AFTRA does, too.
But I hope the vast majority of SAG-AFTRA members, from the biggest names to the rank-and-file, will be wise enough to ignore the lies and spin from the AMPTP and remember you are all fighting for each other and for your future.

Stay strong.
Stand together.
Win.
#SAGAFTRAStrong

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with David Slack

David Slack Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @slack2thefuture

Oct 25
These stories in the trades have some SAG-AFTRA members concerned.

First, these are likely a kernel of truth under a steaming pile of studio spin.

But let’s cut to the chase. Is Fran Drescher eccentric? Hell yes.

And there’s enormous power in that.🧵
Before talks had broken off, sources say, the four CEOs who attended SAG-AFTRAS negotiations had been taken aback by Drescher's negotiating style, which involved bringing a doll (a heart-shaped plush toy with a smiley face given to Drescher by an 11-year-old fan) and saying Buddhist inspirational quotes. She also alarmed the CEOs when she proclaimed, "I don't care if we are here for a year" in order to achieve the unions ends, sources maintain, which a union source denies. A source close to the union explains that Drescher uses a "less contentious" bargaining process and...
Drescher opened the first Zoom meeting with the A-listers by asking to take a screenshot, or selfie of sorts, according to two sources familiar with the session. The source close to the union maintains that Drescher wanted to take a screenshot in order to preserve the historic moment in the life of the union; SAG-AFTRA collects the history of its union as part of its general operations. Perry politely declined, expressing that he would prefer to get down to business.
CEOs are used to being in rooms with people they can control. People who are afraid of them.

From the start of this negotiation, Fran has made it clear that they cannot control her — and she is not afraid of them.

That scares the shit out of CEOs and gives SAG-AFTRA power.
Fran Drescher and her fearlessness, her unpredicability, and her eccentricity add strength to SAG-AFTRA’s negotiation.

This woman has survived cancer and sexual assault and been publicly authentic and vulnerable about both. You think she’s scared of David F. Zaslav?
Read 7 tweets
Oct 22
Heard a rumor circulating among SAG-AFTRA members that the WGA “finally figured out their deal when writers put pressure on the union to find a solution.”

This is 10000% WRONG.

And this rumor is unionbusting b.s. Here’s why:🧵
First, this claim about the WGA is completely false.

There was never any widespread pressure from WGA members asking our leaders to cave.

That just did not happen.
Yes, the AMPTP tried to sow dissent by planting stories in the trades about meetings with a handful of high-profile members.

But the only thing those meetings did was to *prolong* our strike by a few weeks while the CEOs waited to see if our solidarity was breaking.
Read 12 tweets
Sep 26
As WGA leaders meet today to finalize our deal, we begin a new era for writers — and for labor in our industry.

But we also begin to face the final and most insidious form of unionbusting propaganda: a years-long effort to sell the lie that our strike was not worth it.🧵
Over the coming days, months, and years, the studios, streamers, and their surrogates will take every opportunity to undermine what we have won together.

They will seize on the inevitable consessions and compromises made by our NegCom as proof that we “failed.”
They will urge us to overlook all that we won through hard work and unwavering solidarity.

They will claim it wasn’t enough, that we should have gotten X instead of Y, that we lost more by striking than we gained in this new contract.

And they will be wrong.
Read 9 tweets
Sep 21
Okay. This is some bullshit. This morning, all the CEOs “cleared their schedules” in order to make a deal. But now, some anonymous source says if we don’t take what they’re offering by end of day tomorrow — they’re just gonna trash the rest of the year? Absurd.🧵
Does anyone believe those CEOs wanted to clear their schedules and be in that room today? Hell no. They pay Carol for that.

They were there because they had to be — because our power demanded it.
And all our power and leverage is not going to magically vanish at end of business on a Thursday just because some rando exec wishes it away.

The CEOs can’t afford to lose another quarter, another month, another week. They are hurting.
Read 7 tweets
Sep 15
Now that the WGA has confirmed the possibility of a meeting, I really hope this is the start of genuine good faith negotiations by the studios.

But if they’re following the old unionbusting playbook, which they have so far, it’s possible this is a trap.🧵 deadline.com/2023/09/writer…
With the caveat that I have no inside info about this negotiation, here’s how this unionbusting trap works:

They’ve already done the simple version on 8/22: Set a meeting, get everyone’s hopes up, then dash them.

But there’s an even more insidious version of this trap.
Here’s how this unionbusting trap works:

The companies signal that they want to talk, and the instant the union engages in scheduling, the companies “prematurely” put out a press release about new talks — getting everyone’s hopes up.
Read 10 tweets
Sep 11
People are understandably confused about how Drew Barrymore could be scabbing against the WGA and not against SAG-AFTRA.

So let’s take this opportunity to increase our union literacy. 🧵
Unions are complicated. They come in all shapes and sizes and can operate in a variety of different ways.

For example, both the WGA and SAG-AFTRA are called “guilds” rather than unions because they represent independent contractors instead of employees.
Within one union, there can be different bargaining units. A bargaining unit is a group of workers who negotiate together.
Read 20 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(