But standing by and watching will only make things worse. Amid China's actions in HK and intentions for Taiwan, it's vital to support both Israel and Ukraine.
It's not about countries — it's about the world we want to live in 🧵1/14
Anyone with a concept of morality was horrified by the Hamas attack on October 7, which targeted women, children, the elderly – and even a peaceful music festival. One person who was not horrified was Vladimir Putin (2/14)
For him, Hamas’ attack and Israel’s retaliation have been a welcome distraction from his own terror campaign in Ukraine. With the media focused on the Middle East, the killing of civilians in Zaporizhzhia and Kharkiv by Russian missiles has almost gone unnoticed (3/14)
Nothing implicates Putin in the Hamas attack. But it is interesting that his regime has held several meetings with Hamas over the past year, and Putin has compared Israel’s blockade of Gaza with the Nazi siege of Leningrad (4/14)
Putin called the Hamas attack ‘an example of US policy failure in the Middle East’, this is key to understanding how it serves his interests
It furthers the perception that the West is weak, and that perception generates instability and emboldens autocrats and terrorists (5/14)
Western resolve has been straining for years, tested by the Syrian civil war, the Iraq debacle, the Taliban’s reconquest of Afghanistan, the war in Ukraine from 2014 and Putin’s full-scale invasion in 2022. The Hamas attack is the latest test, and demands a robust response (6/14)
However, the US has shown restraint so far – backing Ukraine just enough not to lose, but not enough to win decisively. This, for many outside the democratic world, makes America appear weak – ‘they want to win, but they can’t pull it off’, they think (7/14)
The truth is, many Americans don’t want to be the world police anymore. But if the police step back from their work, criminals cease to fear them, every lowlife out there will think they can get away with anything, and the challenges to the global order will intensify (8/14)
What will happen next? Will China, having already trampled the rights of Hong Kong, escalate its aggression against Taiwan? If not them, there are many potential flashpoints around the world, from Kosovo to Iran (9/14)
President Biden gives some hope with his response to these challenges. He realizes that Hamas and Putin share a common goal – to annihilate a neighboring democracy – as well as common tactics – those of terrorism (10/14)
While many in the US question why they should foot the bill for maintaining peace, Biden sees it as a smart investment. And he is right – the alternative, of retreating from the world and allowing bad actors to run riot – would have catastrophic consequences (11/14)
While American engagement is critical, Europe also has a role to play. Bad actors – Putin being one of them – seek to destabilize European societies, and the EU must be proactive in putting a stop to it, notably by giving Ukraine the tools it needs to secure victory (12/14)
The sooner Kyiv is able to decisively fight off the Russian invasion, the less serious the damage will be – to Ukraine, to Europe, and to the global order as a whole (13/14)
The aim of ensuring a Ukrainian victory in no way contradicts support for Israel in its fight against Hamas. On the contrary, these are two parts of the same struggle. Because a win for terror anywhere is a win for terror everywhere (14/14)
🧵How the Hamas attack on Israel and consequent escalation benefit Putin 1/9
Putin utilizes chaos as a tool, seeking to draw what he desires from the murky waters. His foremost desire at the moment? To ensure he doesn't lose in Ukraine. 2/9
When Hamas instigated an assault on Israel, it indirectly benefited Putin. The event had a domino effect and pushed Ukraine's resistance against Putin to the sidelines of international attention. 3/9
When we think of terrorism, we think of bombs in backpacks, suicide attacks and explosives in cars.
But what happens when the terrorist is a leader of a country?
Given Putin’s family history, it is almost shocking he would stoop to such lows 🧵 1/17
Some refer to Putin's strategy of bombing Ukrainian cities’ energy infrastructure as the ‘Surovikin method’, after the high-ranking general who was removed from his post after the Wagner mutiny. But in reality it already has a name: terrorism 2/17
The Russian criminal code defines terrorism as ‘the ideology of violence and of influencing decision-making by state bodies through acts designed to scare the population and/or other forms of unlawful violent action’ 3/17
The world would breathe a sign of relief if Putin were to step down right now, and be replaced with a new president.
But whoever that new president may be, the relief would be short-lived. Inevitably, Russia would soon descend into chaos once again.
Let me explain🧵
Many in the Western establishment like to speculate on who would make a ‘good’ president to replace Putin. All kinds of familiar names are brought up, and many of them seem at first glance to be genuinely good guys with good ideas
The idea seems to be ‘Putin is bad, so he does bad things, but a good guy would do good things’. But this is a very naïve and simplistic view of the reality in Russia, because no ‘good guy’ could be president – or more accurately, no president can be a ‘good guy’
Putin likes to say Russia – and he, by extension – is not isolated because of the war with Ukraine. It’s true – he has plenty of friends. In fact, Kim Jong-Un is visiting Russia right now!
🧵Let’s take a closer look at some of Putin’s remaining friends:
First, the obvious one: Alexander Lukashenko, the dictator of Belarus for 29 years.
Accused of falsifying elections, repression and usurpation of power, as well as aiding Putin in his illegal invasion of Ukraine. He and Putin are two peas in a pod
Ilkham Aliev, the 20-year president of Azerbaijan, is also suspected of repression and falsifying elections (this will be a common theme), on top of corruption and a multitude of human rights abuses
On August 23 1939, a momentous event equated Hitler and Stalin in the eyes of millions.
The Molotov-Ribbentrop pact: an agreement between Nazi Germany and the USSR.
84 years later, Putin is trying to follow in Stalin's footsteps. 🧵Here’s why it's a doomed path
We were distracted yesterday, let's try to refocus for a moment
The pact of non-aggression of 1939 was an agreement of convenience which partitioned Eastern Europe. Stalin believed it would prevent a war between the countries. He was, of course, wrong
Hitler invaded the Soviet Union less than two years later, taking Stalin by surprise – meaning the only result of the treaty was that, instead of all of eastern Europe being subjugated by Hitler from 1939 to 1941, part of it was instead subjugated by Stalin