“WHO’s recommendation that only droplet and contact precautions be used for patients with possible 2019-nCoV infections is irresponsible and may endanger healthcare workers. The WHO (…) neglects the precautionary principle…”
GlobalNursesUnited to @DrTedros, 30 January, 2020.
@DrTedros “Health & care workers..on the frontline of the COVID19 pandemic..are often under-protected and over-exposed”
“WHO estimates at least 115000health & care workers have lost their lives during COVID19.” (june 2021)
Now read again the letter👆of Global Nurses United, @DrTedros.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
@DrMikeRyan on the cruise ship outbreak :
“Let’s be careful not to overreact..Remember, in SARS..this disease isn’t airborne..[😳]there was a great scare that this was airborne..It didn't turn out to be so..
a cruise ship is a very particular environment.”
Where to start... Well, what Mike Ryan claimed is pure science denial. Many scientific studies before the pandemic concluded that SARS showed airborne transmission and public health must take that into account. Even the WHO website (!) literally says: “SARS is an airborne virus”.
The article is correct and is based upon a press conference held on Feb. 8, 2020 by the Shanghai Municipal Government and confirmed that the new corona virus can be transmitted through aerosols and people may be infected by inhaling virus aerosols.
We don’t know what Anthony Fauci told @DrLaPook, but the message, in complete contrast with the article they shared in private, was basically - don’t worry people, “we should be more concerned about the flu” and the crucial fact of airborne transmission is not mentioned.
“The proposal to achieve CO2 levels of 1000ppm..will not only help achieve WHO guidelines for providing children with healthy indoor environments, it will also provide a low-cost intervention for helping control the TB epidemic in areas of high prevalence” journals.plos.org/plosone/articl…
“To estimate the risk of M. tuberculosis transmission inside public buildings..CO2 sensors were placed…”
“Measurements indicate that infection risk in the church, classroom and clinic waiting room would be high…”
‘Every public building and every schoolhouse shall be ventilated in such a proper manner that the air shall not become so exhausted as to be injurious to the health of the persons present therein.’
…their 19th century portable CO2 meters: ‘air-testers’ made by the German Professor Wolpert.
If these tests showed insufficient ventilation, the inspector wrote an order and later revisited the school, tested the air again to see whether the ventilation was indeed improved.
In an annual report, I found how an inspector notes very poor ventilation (2900 ppm CO2) just when there is an outbreak of diptheria, which is airborne. Four boys die from it. The school is temporarily closed and an order for improved ventilation is written and executed.
In an 1899 article, Dr. Fitz explains his new, practical method of measuring CO2 in more detail.
Some “ready methods” (no lab necessary) already existed, but they were or not accurate enough, or not fit for schools because they were “beyond the technical skill of the teacher”.🧵
Take a look at that table 👇 used to determine the CO2 values at the time. I have added the values in ppm. Very recognizable, isn't it?
People from the 18th century would find it hard to believe that in the 21st century there is controversy over the claim that a patient suffering from a virus closely related to smallpox, “communicates an infectious quality to the air that surrounds him.”