How to get URL link on X (Twitter) App

“21% [of the aircrew infectious with mpox] reported having traveled with respiratory symptoms which potentially pose a greater risk for transmission…”
“Studies in schools have illustrated that mitigations aimed at removing virus from the air were associated with reduced transmission of COVID-19.”
https://twitter.com/mark_ungrin/status/1788708305545912596

“…dominant voices in the infection prevention and control community did not grasp the basics of airborne transmission and failed to listen to people who did.”
Source: ficsa.org/fileadmin/user…
https://twitter.com/johnjohnstoned/status/1782284349616087314
FACT: this was NOT about science. It was about politics, PPE shortages and the Infection Prevention and Control leaders trying to prevent at all costs and AGAINST all scientific evidence, the recommendation of airborne precautions in hospitals.
https://twitter.com/emilyakopp/status/1768656499985842550
“…not all of the initial cases were linked to the local wet market, pointing to the possibility that the (…) market was a source of an amplification event rather than the origin of SARS-CoV-2.”
“Data summarizing the past 219 laboratory infection incidents showed that 73% of laboratory-acquired infections were caused by aerosol spills (Pedrosa & Cardoso, 2011).” (2/5)
https://twitter.com/who/status/1243972193169616898
Will be interesting to see what they do… @X @WHO
“…and in consequence of the overcrowding of the hospitals, which killed some two thousand people, they took forty cases into the [well ventilated] prison, and not one of them spread.”
“Procedural errors represented the leading cause of laboratory-acquired infections (LAIs)..followed by unknown causes.. needlestick injuries..spills..not stated..splashes..broken vials..or animal bites.”
“The risk of a man-made pandemic from a lab escape is not hypothetical.”
https://twitter.com/profemer/status/1732873171181703545
“…in spite of prior scientific knowledge, UK government preparation was pathetic; the official narrative advocated measures directed against non-dominant modes of transmission (e.g., fomites) while practically ignoring airborne transmission (aerosols).”
https://twitter.com/mdc_martinus/status/1716846557432078763
Source: thelancet.com/journals/lance…
https://twitter.com/gunnergale/status/1677779708057116673The reply of @gabbystern however avoids the whole issue.
https://twitter.com/nationalnurses/status/1222930910783266816
👇 https://twitter.com/joanelizshields/status/1716780702941823486
https://twitter.com/ariccio/status/1714800467388125203
The article is correct and is based upon a press conference held on Feb. 8, 2020 by the Shanghai Municipal Government and confirmed that the new corona virus can be transmitted through aerosols and people may be infected by inhaling virus aerosols.
“The proposal to achieve CO2 levels of 1000ppm..will not only help achieve WHO guidelines for providing children with healthy indoor environments, it will also provide a low-cost intervention for helping control the TB epidemic in areas of high prevalence”