Stephen Barlow Profile picture
Oct 25 17 tweets 4 min read Twitter logo Read on Twitter
I want to highlight and amplify, how current policymakers and governments, have simply chosen to give up on the climate, ecological and sustainability emergency, simply because it conflicts, with the economic and financial policy, they want to continue with.
1/🧵
If you look at the 1972 UN Conference on the Human Environment, the 1987 UN Brundtland report, Our Common Future and the 1992 Rio Earth Summit, based on this, all the present and future catastrophes were clearly foreseen over 50 years ago.

2/un.org/en/conferences…
In other words, 51-31 years ago, governments and world leaders, recognized the potential catastrophic impacts, of economic growth and the system that had developed, based on this, and attempted to develop strategies, to prevent future crises.

3/sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/docume…
I have placed links to the relevant UN webpages, which document, the events and reports I refer to. Unfortunately, I have no idea how these references and links will appear, due to Elon Musk's interference with how links are displayed.

4/un.org/en/conferences…
Yet if you read the reports linked to on the webpages I've provided here, it becomes clear that the our governments have done nothing whatsoever to address these future catastrophes, and are just carrying on with business as usual, as if these crises do not exist.
6/
Yet if you read the reports linked to on the webpages I've provided here, it becomes clear that the our governments have done nothing whatsoever to address these future catastrophes, and are just carrying on with business as usual, as if these crises do not exist.
6/
Take just one part of this overall system crisis, the climate crisis. Present policymakers talk, as if they have addressed this crisis and it is not a future danger. But there is a massive gulf, between their rhetoric, and the reality.
7/
Professor Kevin Anderson @KevinClimate is one of the world's leading climate scientists, especially in the field of what sort of future emissions, and climate scenarios, our present policy is leading to. Please see his presentation here.

8/
What @KevinClimate demonstrates, is that current climate policy, is actually leading us to 3-4C of warming in the future i.e. by the end of the century, not Net Zero by 2050, or the 1.5C Paris Agreement Policy.
9/
In fact, @KevinClimate calls present Net Zero policy, Not Zero, simply because the policy framework, will deliver us nothing like Net Zero, Not Zero. It's a real The Emperor's Clothes type absurdity. The rhetoric, is detached from the reality, to a ridiculous extent.
10/
An analogy, is the Theranos, blood analyser fraud perpetrated by Elizabeth Holmes. She falsely claimed to have developed this incredible blood analysis machine and got massive investments, including from tech billionaires.

11/businessinsider.com/theranos-found…
We now know, that this was all empty rhetoric. There was no magic blood analysis machine, it was just a fraud. Net Zero by 2050 is a fraud, in that mould, but on a much bigger scale, and is being perpetrated by our governments, policymakers and corporations.
12/
This gigantic global scam, is meant to mislead the public into believing that our governments have policy and the technology to prevent climate catastrophe. So they can just carry on with business as usual, and fossil fuels, without the consequences.
13/
There are amazing parallels with Elizabeth Holmes' fraud. She does appear to have set out to build this blood analyser, but when it was impossible, she just pretended to have achieved it, with fraud. This is exactly what our governments are doing with Net Zero policy.
14/
This has allowed climate crisis denier to credibly claim climate policy is fraudulent. But what they have got wrong, is claiming that climate change is a fraud. No anthropogenic climate change, the climate crisis is real, but it is the policy to address it which is the fraud.
15/
Our governments, our policymakers claim to have addressed the ecological, sustainability, and climate crisis, which the 1972 and 1992 UN Conferences dealt with. But they have not even addressed the basics, and the crises unfold without solutions. Only fraudulent solutions.
16/
@threadreaderapp Please unroll?

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Stephen Barlow

Stephen Barlow Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @SteB777

Oct 26
I've been trying to frame a huge problem about the climate crisis, and I am struggling for the terms to frame it, and the whole concept.

The problem with most thinking about the climate crisis, is most of the policy and technology, is not real and founded in reality.
1/🧵
I was just trying to brush up, on @KevinClimate analysis, of carbon capture, NETs, geogengineering et al, in video presentations. However, the problem is we're talking about things which don't exist, and which might never exist, at the scale necessary.
2/
However, it is not just these technologies, but climate policy in general. Not just Net Zero, but most floated climate policy of the last 30+ years. It's all just hot air and talk, that has not lead to any real world falls in emissions.
3/
Read 25 tweets
Oct 22
I want to expose the sheer stupidity of journalists who deny the climate crisis. In this case Peter Hitchens @ClarkeMicah who writes in the Mail. Here he makes a stupid mistake about another matter, that 2 minutes of basic research, should have found.
1/🧵 Image
In this article for the Mail, about a so-called prison experiment on Ch4, Hitchens refers to the "The world's most famous prison experiment, the Milgram study in the US in 1961". No the Milgram experiment was not about prison.

2/ en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milgram_e…

Image
Image
Obviously, Peter Hitchens @ClarkeMicah was referring to the Stanford Prison Experiment (1971) led by Professor Philip Zimbardo, a whole 10 years after the Milgram experiment, led by Yale psychologist, Stanley Milgram.

3/en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stanford_…
Read 11 tweets
Oct 21
This is sinister in the extreme:

"UK government keeping files on teaching assistants and librarians’ internet activity

Exclusive: Department for Education monitoring social media posts from England-based staff for criticism of its policies"

1/🧵theguardian.com/politics/2023/…
This is clearly political, and this government is using state apparatus, for political reasons. Not only is this authoritarian, and what you'd expect in a police state, it is pure corruption, as politicians are not supposed to use state apparatus for political reasons.
2/
There is plenty of other evidence, that this Conservative regime, has since the very beginning, being using departmental news management, in an extreme and dishonest way, not seen under any other regime, prior to it.
3/
Read 25 tweets
Oct 19
I want to endorse, and amplify what @GretaThunberg said in this speech. Her analysis is perfect.

We have entered a new phase of the climate crisis, where it is now utterly certain, that our leadership has betrayed us and is gaslighting us.

1/
Since the 1992 Rio Earth Summit, our leadership has peddled this lie, that they were committed to addressing the climate, ecological and sustainability crisis. Just not yet, but that they were going to do it, before it was too late.

2/un.org/en/conferences…
I questioned this from the very beginning, when in 1992, in a post Earth Summit, seminar, a very senior scientist, said now we know what the problem is, we can address and solve it. I said, but that's what they said after 1972 UN Environment conference.

3/un.org/en/conferences…
Read 16 tweets
Oct 2
I've not read @NaomiAKlein's book, but I am very familiar with the whole phenomenon, or rather phenomena. There are essentially 3 components of this, and one overarching mechanism, making it possible.
1/🧵
First, there's the phenomenon of lots of people, believing the same thing, even if it is completely baseless and detached from reality. Believing it in a fervent way. It's what makes it different and more real to people, than crank individual beliefs. Massive reinforcement.
2/
Secondly, we live in a very uncertain world, and at some level, probably unconsciously, people are aware they are being gaslighted, by governments, by the media. They are looking for explanations to make sense of this, so fall prey to fake conspiracy theories.
3/
Read 26 tweets
Sep 28
Therese Coffey is a delusional, bare-faced liar because:

1) This transition from fossil fuels, and an agreement on phasing them out, was supposed to have happened in the 1990s.

2) We are never going to reach Net Zero by mass burning of fossil fuels.
1/🧵
If anyone in any way disputes what I say, then here is the "UNITED NATIONS FRAMEWORK CONVENTION
ON CLIMATE CHANGE", signed in 1992 and framed in 1990s, which specifically refers to the Montreal Protocol (1987) multiple times. @KevinClimate

2/unfccc.int/files/essentia…
It is very clear, that the treaty, not only saw the Montreal Protocol (1987) as an exemplar, which phased out CFCs, but as a continuation of that treaty, as CFCs were a powerful greenhouse gas.
3/
Read 12 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(