Tyler Austin Harper Profile picture
Oct 27 10 tweets 2 min read Twitter logo Read on Twitter
This is what we're witnessing – the dismantling of public higher ed in conservative states – and we've created the conditions for what's going on at UNC. How did anyone think we could get away with being nakedly ideological for years without any chickens coming home to roost? 1/
Universities have always been tacitly left-leaning and faculty have always been openly so, but institutions have never been this transparently, officially political. Almost every single job ad in my field/related fields this year has some kind of brazenly politicized language. 2/
An example. Here's language from a current lit job ad: "We see this position as building on recent hiring in the English department in decolonial and anti-racist pedagogies and practices as well as a recent cluster hire in research related to diversity, equity, and inclusion." 3/
Imagine if a public university job ad instead read: "We see this position as building on recent hiring in the English department in traditionalist pedagogies and practices as well as a recent cluster hire in research related to pro-life ethics, nationalism, and family values." 4/
If you lived in a blue state and your public universities were advertising jobs seeking scholars who promote family values and nationalist pedagogies, you would *rightly* be having a meltdown and demanding representatives fix it! This isn't about conservative or liberal profs 5/
This isn't about the right of individual faculty to *be* political or teach political subject matter. That's the whole point of academic freedom! This is about universities shamelessly embracing, as their official institutional posture, an openly ideological framework/stance 6/
This isn't about the right of individual faculty to *be* political or teach political subject matter. That's the whole point of academic freedom! This is about universities shamelessly embracing, as their official institutional posture, an openly ideological framework/stance 6/
It's *because* I'm a leftist humanities professor that I think we need institutional neutrality. The survival of higher ed, the humanities, absolutely depends on universities being officially non-political so that faculty/students have the academic freedom *to be* political. 7/
I don't care if I'm a broken record. Our society desperately needs the humanities, and a functional public higher education system more broadly. And *at the very moment* we're under sustained assault, some of us are still pouring fuel on Chris Rufo's bonfire. UNC is the result.
What I find heartbreaking is that I really believe this was preventable. Or I at least believe that if defunding the humanities was inevitable, given the transformation of universities into Hedonist Experiential Luxury Resorts, it didn't have to happen this fast or in this way.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Tyler Austin Harper

Tyler Austin Harper Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Tyler_A_Harper

Oct 18
I wrote about Israel/Palestine, "decolonization," and the fantasy that American universities are hotbeds of leftist indoctrination. Conservatives get one thing right: universities are a breeding ground for extremist ideology. But it's not leftism, it's corporate radicalism. 🧵
Conservatives see recent events as "proof" that Ivy League universities are full of young "cultural Marxist" revolutionaries (and their faculty overlords) who adhere to dangerous ideas (e.g., "decolonization") that threaten to overturn American society, violently if need be. 2/
The idea that elite universities are leftist is 👏 a 👏 delusion 👏. The most popular major across the Ivy League is Econ. 50 percent of Penn grads go into finance or consulting. Ivies are worse at producing Marxists than they are at football. And they suck at football. 3/
Read 6 tweets
Oct 5
However you feel about DEI statements & the academic freedom question, we do not spend enough time talking about how DEI statements serve a gatekeeping function: privileging candidates from elite programs + backgrounds who are mentored to know the latest jargon/best practices 1/
I want to be clear this isn’t an ideological critique: on search committees, I’ve repeatedly seen how such statements work to the advantage of applicants from elite programs, who are often able to avail themselves of endless workshops, DEI certificates, etc to learn the lingo 2/
I frequently see applicants from state school PhDs w/ great cover letters, etc. but “weak” diversity statements. It’s not because they care less about diversity, it’s because they don’t have endless DEI programming available to them and aren’t bathed in buzzwords from day one 3/
Read 10 tweets
Sep 28
Maybe the real treasure is not the $43 million Snake Oil Institute, but the friends we swindled along the way?

I wrote about the meteoric rise and ignominious decline of one Ibram X. Kendi. A tale told through his books. 1/

washingtonpost.com/books/2023/09/…
Philip Rieff said of the self-help, therapeutic mindset:
“Our cultural revolution has been made from the top, rather than from the bottom. It is anti-political, a revolution of the rich by which they have lowered the pressure of inherited communal purpose upon themselves.” 2/
Kendi’s brand of antiracism was an anti-political, therapeutic revolution: it allowed the rich to absolve themselves of responsibility for the structural crises and racial disparities they’ve produced by throwing infinite $$$ at a “policy expert” whose real game was self-help 3/
Read 9 tweets
Sep 18
Alright, I'll respond to this.

At no point did I deny that IQ gaps exist and have been measured. My point is that Hanania entirely fails to acknowledge the mainstream scientific consensus that those gaps have explanations that go beyond genetics (e.g. environmental factors) 1/
Likewise, at no point did I argue that the book shouldn't have been published because it's racist/sexist. I'm not an anti-free speech snowflake. But I do believe the publisher had a responsibility to push Hanania to engage with evidence on IQ that does not support his views. 2/
If you're going to make incendiary claims, you should also engage with those who hold opposing views that trouble your assumptions. Especially when those views represent the mainstream. FYI, I have been critical of antiracism/DEI for the same reasons I'm critical of Hanania. 3/
Read 10 tweets
Sep 18
I wrote about the Richard Hanania book.

It’s a hallucinatory patchwork of legitimate intellectual history, racist IQ hokum, and Mad-Men style chauvinism. Rather than “flood the zone with shit” a la Steve Bannon, Hanania hides the shit amidst bland pseudo-scholarship. 🧵
“Reasonable” rightists are going to say that this is an important book that offers a smart, measured history of identity politics.

Anyone making that claim is overlooking A LOT of hiding-in-plain-sight racism. Not “microaggressions.” Cask-strength, blacks-are-dumb racism. 2/
Hanania’s conceit — that wokeness is downstream from changes in law — is relatively persuasive. It’s more convincing than the common fairy tale that French Theory is to blame for identity politics.

This reasonable claim is then used to Trojan Horse a bunch of bigotry. 3/ Image
Read 9 tweets
Aug 31
Panic about ChatGPT/cheating reflects the fact that the self-worth of many academics is tied to grading as a sorting mechanism. Many profs have a deep emotional investment in grading because they received good grades and they assume a system they benefited from must be good. 1/
Anytime I have asked someone why they’re so worried about ChatGPT/grades/cheating, within two minutes the conversation turns to how hard they personally worked to get good grades in college. ChatGPT threatens the meritocracy that their status/self-esteem is intertwined with 2/
The college I attended had an honor code. Tests were unsupervised. I never knew anyone to cheat. People failed rather than cheat. It is depressing that our default assumption is that students don’t want to learn & that faculty see grades and learning as related and inseparable 3/
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(