It’s been a year since Alloy, the season finale of @lotronprime aired, and millenniums since story of Adam and Eve; and I decided to share a take relating to both.
This is a thread about the original suggestions of Rings of Power,Tolkien Lore and Abrahamic Myth;
1/23
An analysis I write as I go, full of writing mistakes (English is my 2nd language) claiming no theological method/religious virtue or artistic objectivity - just a pop-culture discussion
I'll use some terms interchangeably though experts would never. 2/23
Most important disclaimer: I'll use the term Paradise (جَنّة, cennet, heaven etc.) interchangeably with Heaven and Garden of Eden, which are and can be complete DIFFERENT THINGS.
This is done for the sake of the core argument, so please try to ignore: Let's dive in
3/23
The story of Adam and Eve is omnipresent across the 3 main (and-sub) branches of the Abrahamic myth: Judaism, Christianity and Islam
Each version is somewhat different & subject to countless interpretations - but a basic, simple concept key to this story is temptation
4/23
In all, Adam & Eve are first humans in a paradise-like world & are expelled after a Serpent tempts (note temptation here) them to eat the forbidden fruits of 1 tree
Disclaimer: Lucifer, Satan and Serpent are (or can be) different things* but used synonymously as *LSS* here
5/23
Per 1 Christian tradition, through Eve's influence Adam commits to the original sin, eating from Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil, which God forbid, thus gaining an ability to conjure shame and evil with the risk of them also eating from the other tree (great pic right?)
6/23
In Judaism, Islam and other traditions of Christianity, the morale and the sex factor vary. The 1st sin of eating the fruit exists, but in some with no order in sex, it's forgiven quickly (though with consequences) and in ofc in some it makes humanity inherit an original sin
7/23
Note that I'll use *first sin* for the event of eating the fruit & I won't use it synonymous with the concept of *ORIGINAL SIN* in Christianity:
In all three religions, this first sin lays a foundation of God-human relationship and results in exile
Let’s move onto Tolkien. 8/23
Tolkien whose Catholic faith influenced his works deals with the concept of temptation quite often
Melkor is tempted to fill the void on his own, Fëanor to defy Valar, Sauron to dominate, Ar-Pharazôn for immortality, Galadriel to rule: The Ring itself is a temptation
9/23
I’m gonna skip all the parallels between LSS and Melkor/Sauron and instead now look at the triangle of Fëanor, Galadriel and Sauron per Tolkien himself.
In a way Fëanor & Galadriel (OF COURSE not a romantic couple but a family duo of uncle and nephew) are Adam & Eve
10/23
Living in the undying world of a Paradise (Valinor) Fëanor captures the fruit (the light) of Two Trees of Valinor (very lossely parallel to Trees in Garden of Eden) and like LSS, Melkor stirs the pot by stealing Silmarils, leading to Fëanor's rebellion and ensuing exile
11/23
Galadriel, Fëanor’s female equivalent (his only equivalent per Tolkien), is the only female leader in the rebellion, providing an Eve, is carrying the same shadow (temptation) in her heart as Fëanor, who also as a result receives a near-personal ban from re-entering Valinor
12/23
Ofc Galadriel & Fëanor are NOT an (incest) allegory ever for Adam & Eve and ofc they can be associated with many other Abrahamic characters but in a way they are the prominent male and female figures expelled by the Divine as a result of temptation - caused by LSS (Melkor)
13/23
Per my take, interesting enough, unlike conservative or some traditional readings of Adam and Eve, Tolkien chooses a later, contemporary, or his own (or combined) take that this sin was not initiated by the woman. Fëanor was tempted first - Galadriel did not start this.
14/23
And Galadriel survives to redeem her path back to Valinor: again, proving a higher wisdom than Adam (Fëanor in this case). It’s not very surprising: Tolkien doesn’t have many female villains and women often represent wisdom and stamina. Then there's the subject of Sauron
15/23
Sauron, the first male (in-form) spirit that was tempted by Melkor, the first male (in-form) sub-God, so somewhat *another* LSS; tries to tempt our female (Eve) figure Galadriel, several times; like Genesis but Tolkien avoids that allegory: Galadriel refuses Sauron. 16/23
Here in this analogy I propose, we observe Tolkien's total refusal of Eve being the enabler of the first sin but actually being a secondary sinner and the premier redeemer: A twist to Adam & Eve. Then Rings of Power and its own 1st sin story (of 2nd age) happens:
Buckle up
17/23
@lotronprime does something interesting: Now Sauron, the LSS, is Galadriel's Adam: maybe like Lucifer in shape of Serpent, here LSS presents himself as Adam (Halbrand) Not only Adam is altered to be the first tempted but also refused by his Eve, who tries to kill him
18/23
He does so in the garden of Eregion, where many beauties are created like it is in Paradise, under *trees*. They then even transport under a tree in their own Garden of Eden, Valinor. In both places, Galadriel (Eve) refuses Halbrand (Adam) and the fruit of domination
19/23
Show takes Tolkien’s Eve-redemption much further: Adam is not only the first tempted and enabler of the first sin but in fact he is actually the conceiver, LSS himself. Galadriel (Eve) tries to kill him - a bit like Tolkien said Galadriel hated and swore to thwart Fëanor
20/23
So, Tolkien and TROP redeem their own Eve, Galadriel, (per my take) by still keeping her somewhat involved in the first sin (Galadriel leaving Valinor despite hating Fëanor or Galadriel befriending Halbrand despite later refusing him); TROP double-twists her
21/23
Surely there's the subject of Mary but that's not gonna be discussed here.
Galadriel both in TROP and per Tolkien constitute a challenge against *the woman* of *the legend*, participating and putting faith in the myth but indirectly altering its interpretation:
22/23
The Woman of The Story: She who is premier in wisdom and not in mistake.
She who follows but survives and outlives the premier *he* who is mistaken: she who creates the story herself of life that you die proud in delusion or live through darkness and *touch* the light.
23/23
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
After long deliberations & debates, I feel closest to the term 'loose adaptation' for The Rings of Power. (subjectively)
Per its dictionary meaning (without any value connotation) 'fan-fiction' almost always has the characteristic of lacking copyright authorisation. Then,
1/15
In my head, 'canon' refers to anything the artist thought, spoke, wrote (including each version if changed several times) published or unpublished, became public when artist was alive or publicised after death; all constitute 'canon'.
Therefore ,
2/15
Calling any type of adaptation that turns 1 means of art-making (writing in this case) into another (music, theatre, TV, cinema etc.) will never be canon and I say this without personal feelings. The process inherently makes the adaptation non-canon per above definition.
Tolkien, a Catholic man in love with a woman, living in England at a time when homosexuality is a crime, didn't have much reason to speak about the subject.
Although he had at least three queer people in his life with whom he shared good friendship and literary interests. 1/9
Mary Renault had already published her lesbian novel 'The Friendly Young Ladies' and a gay romance 'The Charioteer', living with her female partner for a long time by the time Tolkien expressed his pleasure of their exchanges and how deeply he's engaged in her books. 2/9
He also had a close friendship with W.H. Auden, a poet whose gay lovers were not fully a secret, with contempt for fascism similar to Tolkien. He helped LOTR gain fame through his reviews and Tolkien wrote a poem to praise him, seeing him as one of his "chief encouragements" 3/9
Tolkien didn’t write an allegory but openly said his readers could seek historical applicability
Those who apply Northern European context to the story cannot prevent me from applying the historical fact that queer people existed for thousands of years but were hiding mostly 1/5
And most them had no option than either living alone or binding themselves to a heterosexual partnership. Very often in those ancient European days you glorify too
You cant take parts of historical realities you like to apply those to Tolkien and then deny it to other people 2/5
Everybody is free to think of the romantic feelings that could not be accepted by the society but still existed deep in hearts, then apply it to the cases of Sam and Frodo; Túrin and Beleg; Legolas and Gimli; Melian and Galadriel; Celebrimbor and Annatar and so on 3/5
My sister is a statistician (phd) with an MA in theology & currently completing an MA in philosophy… She’s a revisionist muslim who approaches religious from a philosophical and human rights perspective but still, her faith and the inherent dogmatism +
in that faith has been a big topic of many heated debates between us as I do not identify with any Abrahamic religion and she found my interest in fantasy an escapist attempt
But now something very interesting is happening. As a big supporter of my amateur art journey, she +
Started feeling curious about the stories I’m illustrating and asking questions about how they’re tied to that fantasy film trilogy I was obsessed with.
Our conversations turned into Tolkien characters and their journeys, theological and philosophical applications +
But queer people you desperately want to associate with such crimes just want kids to know being different is OK, you mustn’t be ashamed / shame other kids for being different, so that their little hearts don’t suffer like ours did 1/4
Be OK with it or not, history and science make it clear that queerness won’t cease to exist.
Inflicting pain onto others for who they are from an early age leads to severe mental (and physical) consequences that are so difficult to heal from - it’s so humane and cruel 2/4
Your intent of framing a mere wish to prevent the pain of kids to become happier adults as ‘grooming’ just makes it clear that your problem is with our very existence.
You think we deserve the pain. We know it - and we won’t allow it. 3/4
Charlie Vickers clean shaven face from the filming wrap-up party (confirming @FellowshipFans scoops) makes me think of a few things (apart from how funny and cute he looks)
A mini thread. 1/5
1) He wore wigs in S1. The photos from the party confirm that he's grown his natural hair long since then for Season 2 which has a darker shade.
It kind of changes his visage and aura and I like it's gonna make him look 'less Halbrand' in line with the character's evolution. 2/5
2) The clean-shaven face confirms FoF scoops. With darker hair; pale skin and a clean-shave, combined with the FoF description of a fiery, ashy style, he's going to resemble a vampire - which is very suitable as Sauron took that form in the past during his fight with a doggo 3/5