Read on Twitter
🚨
New Denver District Judge Sarah Wallace, a Democrat Donor, Commits Reversible Error By Refusing to Recuse from Trump January 6th Case After Donating to Anti-Trump January 6th PAC
1. On August 18, 2022, Democrat Governor Jared Polis appointed Democrat donor Sarah Wallace as a Denver District Judge, starting on January 10, 2023.
2. On October 15, 2022, Judge-designee Sarah Wallace donated to the Colorado Turnout Project, a political action committee formed to vote out Republicans who supported Trump on January 6, 2021.
3. This week, Judge Wallace is holding a highly unusual (and unconstitutional) trial to determine whether to disqualify Trump from the ballot based upon his activities on January 6th.
4. Judge Wallace previously rejected all of Trump’s legal arguments, including the only way to disqualify for insurrection under the Section 3 of the 14th Amendment is to win a federal criminal conviction under the federal insurrection criminal statute Congress passed to execute Section 3.
5. Today, Judge Wallace admitting to making the anti-Trump January 6th PAC donation. She said she didn’t remember making it. But despite her donation, she claims she can be fair.
But her subjective belief in her ability to be fair is not the correct legal standard.
The standard is an objective one:
Will the public reasonably believe she can give Trump a fair January 6th-related bench trial after she donated to an anti-Trump January 6th PAC ?
The answer is clearly not.
This is the reversible error.
But will the Democrat-controlled Colorado appellate courts correct this?
New Denver District Judge Sarah Wallace, a Democrat Donor, Commits Reversible Error By Refusing to Recuse from Trump January 6th Case After Donating to Anti-Trump January 6th PAC
1. On August 18, 2022, Democrat Governor Jared Polis appointed Democrat donor Sarah Wallace as a Denver District Judge, starting on January 10, 2023.
2. On October 15, 2022, Judge-designee Sarah Wallace donated to the Colorado Turnout Project, a political action committee formed to vote out Republicans who supported Trump on January 6, 2021.
3. This week, Judge Wallace is holding a highly unusual (and unconstitutional) trial to determine whether to disqualify Trump from the ballot based upon his activities on January 6th.
4. Judge Wallace previously rejected all of Trump’s legal arguments, including the only way to disqualify for insurrection under the Section 3 of the 14th Amendment is to win a federal criminal conviction under the federal insurrection criminal statute Congress passed to execute Section 3.
5. Today, Judge Wallace admitting to making the anti-Trump January 6th PAC donation. She said she didn’t remember making it. But despite her donation, she claims she can be fair.
But her subjective belief in her ability to be fair is not the correct legal standard.
The standard is an objective one:
Will the public reasonably believe she can give Trump a fair January 6th-related bench trial after she donated to an anti-Trump January 6th PAC ?
The answer is clearly not.
This is the reversible error.
But will the Democrat-controlled Colorado appellate courts correct this?
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
