Read on Twitter
The Democratic donating judge in the disbarment trial of Trump's attorney John Eastman is doing everything she can to help the California bar's attorney keep a letter out of evidence from a US Attorney to Trump exposing AG Bill Barr's attempts to squelch election fraud investigations. 🤡🤡🤡🤡So much of this trial has been spent arguing with her about not letting testimony or exhibits into evidence, even though the disciplinary court has far more relaxed hearsay rules than regular courts. Both Eastman and his attorney are sounding annoyed. The judge's favorite words during this trial are "Let's move on."
It said in part, "On Election Day and afterwards, our Office received various allegations of voter fraud
and election irregularities. As part of my responsibilities as U.S. Attorney, I wanted to be transparent with the public and, of course, investigate fully any allegations. Attorney General Barr, however, instructed me not to make any public statements or put out any press releases regarding possible election irregularities."
"I disagreed with that decision, but those were my orders. As a Marine infantry officer, I was trained to follow the chain of command and to respect the orders of my superiors, even when I disagree with them."
It said in part, "On Election Day and afterwards, our Office received various allegations of voter fraud
and election irregularities. As part of my responsibilities as U.S. Attorney, I wanted to be transparent with the public and, of course, investigate fully any allegations. Attorney General Barr, however, instructed me not to make any public statements or put out any press releases regarding possible election irregularities."
"I disagreed with that decision, but those were my orders. As a Marine infantry officer, I was trained to follow the chain of command and to respect the orders of my superiors, even when I disagree with them."
Oh my this banana court trial just got even more insane. The California Bar's OWN CHARGES against Eastman bring up AG Bill Barr's statements! This letter is INCREDIBLY relevant yet the judge has now been trying for a very long time not to admit it as hearsay!
From the Bar's charges against Eastman -
3. In the months following the election, however, the Trump campaign received information from numerous credible sources, including Attorney General of the United States William Barr and members of Trump’s inner circle of advisors, that there was no evidence of widespread election fraud or illegality that could have affected the outcome of the election. On or about December 1, 2020, Attorney General Barr, who headed the United States Department of Justice, which had monitored state elections for fraud and illegality, publicly stated that “to date, we have not seen fraud on a scale that could have effected a different outcome in the election.”
From the Bar's charges against Eastman -
3. In the months following the election, however, the Trump campaign received information from numerous credible sources, including Attorney General of the United States William Barr and members of Trump’s inner circle of advisors, that there was no evidence of widespread election fraud or illegality that could have affected the outcome of the election. On or about December 1, 2020, Attorney General Barr, who headed the United States Department of Justice, which had monitored state elections for fraud and illegality, publicly stated that “to date, we have not seen fraud on a scale that could have effected a different outcome in the election.”
And yep, she refused to admit it into evidence and made him move on. 🤡🤡🤡🤡
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
