Does the NCAA permit Michigan to use a "scouting service" to scout future opponents? Yes...but also no.
Michigan fans are clinging to a 2013 bylaw change as hope they will be spared the wrath of the NCAA. Michigan's own actions suggest they don't believe this.
A thread.
The rule banning in-person scouting of future in-season opponents came in 1994. In the wake of rising athletics revenues from media rights, the difference in budgets was stark. NCAA wanted to keep schools with smaller revenue from being at a disadvantage...
2/
To help accomplish this, the NCAA banned in-person scouting outright except for postseason tournaments of a few sports. This kept bigger schools from paying large expenses to send multiple scouts to various contests.
Below is the rule, bylaw 11.6.2, as of 2012...
3/
In 11.6.2 above, all in-person scouting is prohibited for basketball, football, and women's volleyball. In other sports, schools could not pay expenses for scouting. This meant you could subscribe to a subscription service, but not actually pay people to go scout.
4/
In 2013, the NCAA made a change that streamlined this rule. Given the widespread availability of digital video and subscription services, the NCAA adopted bylaw proposal RWG-11-3-B, which amended 11.6 clarifying all sports could use scouting video.
"Readily available" is key
5/
The NCAA knew most sporting events were now "readily available" to schools and did not see the harm in them utilizing such content. If accessible to all, it did not put anyone at a disadvantage. Here is how a much condensed 11.6 reads in 2023 with the 2013 revisions. 6/
So, if scouting services are now legal, Michigan must not have broken the rules, right? Wrong.
First off, let's not forget Connor Stalions has been spotted at games. That is a direct violation regardless of scouting services.
But if Michigan thought it was in the clear...
7/
Why did Stalions need to hire dudes recording with camera phones and reimburse them through Venmo? If the NCAA *actually* permitted in-person scouting through a third party, Michigan would have hired a legit recording service that obtained a credential through the school.
8/
The NCAA prefers scouting services to be professional and above board. Here is the laundry list of criteria in bylaw 13.14.3 to be considered a "recruiting or scouting service," especially as it relates to evaluating prospects:
9/
For these recruiting and scouting services in prospect evaluation, the NCAA specifically has an approval process to be an official service. The spirit of this rule is the same as in-person scouting as they want good faith actors, not shady characters skirting rules.
10/
Specifically, content must be "readily available" and expenses cannot be reimbursed. The intent behind the rule is for subscription content that is already available at a set price to everyone...not ad hoc camera video from the seats.
11/
Remember that the *intent* of bylaw 11.6 is to keep from paying people to attend games. Paying the travel expenses of anyone to scout is still not permissible in football. To do so in the name of a "scouting service" is a violation of the spirit and letter of the law.
12/
If Michigan thought it were above board, it would hire a professional scouting service, not pay people through Venmo to use their camera phones through third-party ticket vendors.
But real services wouldn't be stealing signs rather than actually filming games.
13/
If Michigan paid an actual, credible scouting service for video of sign-stealing, that service would be shunned by the entire coaching industry. It would violate their trust. Michigan went outside the law precisely because they weren't seeking a "scouting service."
14/
Teams, and scouting services, know that you are not allowed to record audio or videos of opponents' signals. That is expressly forbidden in 1.11 of the NCAA football rules book. You can't hire third parties to do what you can't, to record what you aren't allowed.
15/
Use of video services is certainly allowed. Think subscription services. The content would have to be produced by the service at its own discretion, made available to all at a set rate. The bylaws don't permit sending out scouts to record ad hoc.
16/
That's not what Michigan did here. They compensated people to attend games in person to film signs. This is in no way permissibly by NCAA bylaws. They know it, as does every coach in the NCAA.
/end
@bmoses30
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
"Moody’s credit analysis seeks to incorporate all issues that can materially impact credit quality, including ESG and climate risk; and aims to take the most forward-looking perspective that visibility into these risks and mitigants permits."
Since 2019, Moody's has been incorporating ESG/DEI into its credit ratings of businesses.
"The methodology was updated to explain further our integration of ESG in credit analysis, in particular through our ESG scores."
2/3
"The credit impact of ESG considerations is highly negative or very highly negative for about 20% of the more than 5,700 debt issuers that we have scored for exposure to ESG risks."
That's 1-in-every-5 Moody's dings for not abiding by ESG, rather than fiscal responsibility.
3/4
CDC is out here throwing data from several "multijurisdictional reports" of case rates together, despite a mountain of limitations, and presenting it as science.
These people are just doubling down on junk data. This is not at all intuitive.
These jurisdictional reports do not account for previous infection, length of time between shots or other confounding variables. Worse yet, some vaccination data has proven to be incomplete and literally includes unknown status as unvaccinated. These need to be controlled for.
Folks this is INFURIATING.
When you look at their actual data, late Omicron has 12-17 unvaccinated as three total deaths. This is the date range for the approved bivalent booster. Three.
I don't have to tell you that is not a statistically valid sample for a million reasons.
Three important pieces posted this past week detailing the incentives to overcount deaths associated with COVID-19. The first published in @Newsweek by @DrJBhattacharya and I. Nearly 450,000 Americans have received funeral expense reimbursement.
A COVID diagnosis makes hospitals eligible for 20% addon payments by CMS for Medicare patients (simply testing + when admitted for any reason). Further, when having COVID on the death certificate, families are eligible for funeral expense reimbursement by FEMA.
2/
Befuddling NFL officiating in last few minutes of this game:
* Int. grounding called on JB, but not on PM on 2nd & 4 throw that didn't get back to LOS
* Late hit called on PM, but not on JB throw
* Missed hold & block in back on punt
* Two missed holds on PM scramble
To me, I credit Mahomes for making plays, but this game was won by the KC d-line taking advantage of the Cincinnati injuries up front. But the one-sided officiating was shocking.
They sure had a selective memory of the rules regarding late hits:
As some still try to fearmonger on new variants, rise in cases, etc., we are reminded it's baseless.
Here is ave. inpatient census (with) COVID-19 by week (1st axis), w/ave ICU, multiple cause of death & underlying cause (2nd axis). Notice the separation since spring of 2022.
Blue = inpatient beds used for suspected/confirmed COVID
Orange = ICU census w/confirmed COVID
Gray = all deaths with COVID on death certificate
Yellow = all deaths where COVID was listed as primary (underlying) cause.
2/
Data sources: HHS Reported Inpatient Impact and Hospital Capacity timeseries used for hospital and ICU census where the daily average was used for corresponding weeks.
CDC Wonder MMWR weeks used for weeks ending for multiple and underlying cause of death
3/
"He led with his shoulder!" many college football fans quipped about an argument of potential targeting.
This thread exposes why people saying that don't understand the targeting rules in college football. To be fair, I don't think the officials apply it evenly, either.
1/
If you want to follow along, here is a link to the 2022 NCAA official rules book. You can find the targeting of a defenseless player rule on FR-93 (p. 96 of the PDF) in Rule 9, Art. 4