Which is exactly what Ukrainian Partisans are reporting the Russian Army is suffering in Mariupol as of 27 Oct 2023.
If there is a RuAF fuel shortage in Ukraine, you would expect Ukraine to act to make it worse. 6/
We have confirmation of that with the Ukrainian Security Service attack on the Afip Refinery in the 🇷🇺Krasnodar region - the closest refinery to supply Crimea.
Nor is that the only Ukrainian strike on RuAF fuel distribution.
Now a Russian cistern fuel train in the occupied Donetsk City railway marshaling yard supporting the fuel resupply of RuAF Avdiivka Offensive has been destroyed with much collateral heat damage to the rail infrastructure there.
This will reduce for a week or more the rate at which Russia can expend AFV's at Avdiivka for a lack of means to distribute increasingly interdicted South Russia fuel stocks.
"Knock 'em All Down:" The Reduction of Aachen, October 1944
Christopher R. Gabel, Ph.D.
"The battalion's catchphrase for this operation was "Knock 'em all down." There was no attempt to avoid collateral damage; in fact, the troops displayed ... 2/ globalsecurity.org/military/libra…
...a degree of enthusiasm in wrecking a German city."
Warfare with the Japanese in buildings or caves was a form of civil engineering with direct and indirect fire high explosive.
The level of threat ignorance and institutional delusion here is just awe inspiring.
BLUF:
When it comes to procuring electronic attack (EA) jamming systems. US Army leadership has the same level of competence as a young man who can't get laid in a wh*rehouse with a... 1/
...pocket full of $100 bills and condoms.
Col. Jeffrey Church laid those facts out in the following article:
Army Wrestles With SIGINT vs. EW
By SYDNEY J. FREEDBERG JR.
on July 31, 2018 at 6:33 PM
The US Army's dysfunctional E.A. procurement structure that Col. Church described in 2018 still exists.
In Oct 2023 at the Association of the US Army's (AUSA's) annual symposium, US Army General Randy George told reporters of the US Army's continued EA procurement dysfunction 3/
There are reasons that I'm concerned about Chinese PLA/CCP satellite coverage of US Navy Carrier groups after the US Defense Department ordered a THAAD battery to the Middle East.
Very good reasons having to do with the possibility of Chinese anti-ship ballistic missile (ASBM) tech being on Iranian/Houthi medium range ballistic missiles.
The battlefield vulnerability of the BMPT is easily proven.
There are visuals of a BMPT being engaged by Ukrainian 152mm/155mm artillery shells showing it to be as vulnerable as any other ex-Soviet tank design to modern weapons.
I am really hoping I'm wrong about this prediction of mine regarding THAAD being there to protect US Carriers from Chinese tech anti-ship guided warheads on the Toufan (Iranian Ghadr).
Because if there are Chinese tech ASBM warheads...
The @UKikaski account brings up a good point here that the Russian S-400 SAM went after the biggest radar target, ATACMS the rocket motor, and not the cloud of M74 APAM bomblets it dispensed
The S-400 has some of the issues US Army Patriot had in 1991 & other unique to ATACMS 1/
The cloud of M74 explosive fragmentation death covers up to a square kilometer of area in an oval or circular shape depending on missile trajectory and speed of rotation at the moment of dispensing.
The larger the intended area of coverage...
2/
...the higher the altitude this happens.
The ATACMS being a highly non-ballistic missile target means the S-400 cannot really get a good reciprocal intercept track until the ATACMS trajectory settles down for warhead dispensing.