Glenn Greenwald Profile picture
Nov 2 4 tweets 2 min read Twitter logo Read on Twitter
Nothing has provoked more mockery and scorn from the American Right than grievances from college students and journalists of feeling "unsafe" due to others' views.

And there's nothing that parts of the Right have done more in the last 3 weeks than express such grievances.
Image
Image
The Right when black NYT reporters said they feel unsafe due to an op-ed calling for the military to crush George Floyd protests:

"Journalism is not about creating safe spaces."

Bari Weiss' site today: A jewish Guardian staffer feels "unsafe" due to anti-Israel reporting.

Image
Image
Conservatives pushing this "safety" rhetoric -- which isn't due to violence but words -- should either apologize to the minority groups they mocked all these years, or realize they're suddenly endorsing such flamboyant victim narratives because a group they like is claiming it.
And yes, yes, I know: you think the difference is the views you want censored and people cancelled for are genuinely bigoted, while your views aren't.

All censors think this.

Claiming the only marginalized and vulnerable group in the US are American Jews is ... untenable.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Glenn Greenwald

Glenn Greenwald Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ggreenwald

Oct 26
Absolutely pathetic that frauds like this one spent years parading as free speech warriors -- mocking college students who urged protection from views they find threatening -- only to now exploit this war, that is not even an American war! (😲), to seize broad censorship powers:
One thing that has provoked intense mockery and scorn from the right are victim narratives:

Students weeping, claiming mental trauma from feeling unsafe by bigoted views; depicting college students as children who can't hear upsetting views rather than as adults who must....
Those victim narratives have seen a huge boost in popularity recently, now defended most vocally by exactly the same people who led the mockery and derision when these victimhood claims, and demands for censorship, were invoked by other minority groups:

Read 7 tweets
Oct 25
I'd like to note again that the theory advanced here - that there's no such thing as an innocent Palestinian, or no difference between Palestinians and Hamas, because they elected Hamas (back in 2007) - was bin Laden's view for why all Americans are legitimate military targets:
This was also Hamas' rotted view on Oct. 7: that because Israelis voted for Netanyahu, they are all equally responsible and legitimate targets.

It seems that Americans should be the last people wanting such a theory to take root, given how many countries we bomb and invade. Image
One last point: there are many arguing that pro-Palestinian protests and petitions can and should be censored and outlawed because some entail calls for violence against Israelis.

Isn't the same true of a theory that says all Palestinians should be treated as Hamas?
Read 4 tweets
Oct 15
The attempt to destroy the concept of "civilian" with this rotted rationale -- all citizens are responsible for their leaders' violence -- is dangerous and vile.

This was bin Laden's defense of 9/11 (and Hamas' on Saturday).

It applies more to a democracy (US/UK) than Gaza.
Are Americans really ready to endorse the idea that every American, including civilians, is responsible for the aggression and violence of US leaders? That would make all Americans, and civilian infrastructure, legitimate targets for reprisals.

Compare:

After bin Laden invoked this rationale to deny the validity of the "civilian" category for Americans, the first time I heard someone adopt this view was when Alan Dershowitz argued in 2006 that many "civilians" weren't really civilians in Lebanon.

latimes.com/archives/la-xp…
Image
Read 4 tweets
Oct 10
The EU hired an Omidyar-funded firm ("Reset") that claims to be "disinformation experts". It issued a study accusing Big Tech platforms - especially X - of insufficiently censoring "pro-Russia propaganda."

The EU has a new censorship law and intends to use it to punish X:
The fraudulent "disinformation industry" was invented after Brexit and Trump's 2016 win because Western elites concluded online free speech is too dangerous.

This EU study -- designed to legally force X to censor more -- is supremely fraudulent:

rumble.com/v3ffei8-system…
Image
You should assume that everyone claiming to be a "disinformation expert" is a fraud and censorship advocate.

One of them - @jaredlholt of @ISDglobal - just had a major retraction in @thedailybeast, a tabloid with no standards. Look who funds ISD Global:



Image
Image
Read 4 tweets
Oct 5
Bill Arkin has long ensconced in corporate media, reporting for NYT, WPost and LA Times.

In 2011, he published a great 3-part series,"Top Secret America," with Dana Priest in the WPost.

He has a new article on how FBI is being harnessed to target Trump supporters for 2024:
I've repeatedly documented that the Dem Party is now the party of the US Security State. They revere CIA, FBI, and DHS. It's one reason neocons are Dems.

The reason is that they understand that these agencies are now their political allies against their political opponents. Image
CIA and FBI have repeatedly interfered in domestic politics to help elect Dems.

The bullshit 2016 Russiagate/collusion scandal came from CIA and FBI straight to NYT and WPost.

They're the ones who lied about Hunter laptop being "Russian disinformation" to shield Biden in 2020. Image
Read 4 tweets
Oct 3
The EU has enacted one of the world's most repressive online censorship laws. They're already citing their loss in the Slovak elections as proof they need more censorship.

Note that the NYT says their plan is to force social media sites to censor more - including for the US:👇
Image
What the EU is doing is exactly what neoliberals did in the US and UK after 2016: looked at the 2 election losses they suffered (Brexit and Trump) and concluded they can't allow a free internet any more: too dangerous.

Read about the EU censorship law:

nytimes.com/2023/09/27/tec…
On last night's @SystemUpdate_, we covered how a populist-left former PM in Slovakia won, vowing to cut off all support for the war in Ukraine.

The key is not just what it means for the war, but how the EU is exploiting it to justify more censorship:

Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(