Trent Telenko Profile picture
Nov 3 9 tweets 2 min read Twitter logo Read on Twitter
So, this device protects a circle 1.2 km across from drones & jams GPS/Glonas. That is the coverage of a platoon position in Ukraine, ~25-to-40 men

How many platoons are there in a battalion?

Usually there are 9 for line infantry, plus another 4-to-9 for US Mech Bn "tail"
1/
There are usual 9-to-10 battalions of tanks, infantry, & reconnaissance in a division.

In addition, there are usually 3-to-4 battalions of artillery with 18-to-24 guns each in 3-to-4 batteries of 4-to-8 guns.

Gun batteries will need a minimum of 2 jammers each while using
2/
..."shot & scoot" tactics to avoid counter battery fire.

Plus all artillery fire direction centers will need at least 2-to-3 active jammers so a mass MLRS *blarf* doesn't simply eliminate the grid square they are in.

Then how many are going to be needed with logistics?
Either there will be a jammer moving with every truck convoy and ammunition resupply point
_OR_ you will have to plant a continuous line of jammers along your main supply routes.

If you have three MSR, 24 km long to stop FPV drones, at one jammer per Kilometer for overlap.

3/
That is 72 jammers as a minimum for truck logistics in a divisional supply area.

9 btn X 14 = 126 Jammers
12 Artillery batteries X 2 = 24 jammers
14 fire direction centers X 3 = 42 jammers

4/
The total number of those jammers to cover a divisional sector is going to be a minimum of 264 jammers.

Who is going to properly site, take care and relocate of all of those jammers to support divisional operations?

How well do they have to be trained to do their jobs?

5/
Basically, these jammers will need a platoon for every tank/infantry/artillery battalion.

Plus a jammer company for every divisional main supply route.

We are talking two highly trained/expensive electronic warfare battalions for every division to counter the FPV threat.
6/
People on X making cracks about 'how expensive jam resistant FPV drones will be' demonstrate their technological, procurement & force structure innumeracy.

They are utterly clueless when it comes to deploying a large, skilled, signals trained jamming force structure.🤦‍♂️

7/7 End
@threadreaderapp unroll please.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Trent Telenko

Trent Telenko Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @TrentTelenko

Nov 1
This is one of those glass half empty/glass half full posts about the Russo-Ukraine War.

People wanting to see Russian power, see Russian air superiority.

When I look at Oct 22 report, it tells me that the RuAF has run out of trucks to support their artillery.

Logistics 🧵
1/
The Russians are using the VKS to deliver firepower to the Left bank of the Dnipro in lieu of artillery.

So where are they getting the fuel?

How are they moving & distributing it?

2/

Russia has an increasingly critical shortage of tactical trucks and particularly fuel trucks to distribute fuel.

This is affecting the Russian economy and has caused fuel shortages in Crimea

3/
Read 11 tweets
Oct 30
This @RealCynicalFox post is correct⬇️

A comparison of the US Army fighting the Germans in Aachen and Japanese in Manila are instructive in this regard.

1/
See:

"Knock 'em All Down:" The Reduction of Aachen, October 1944
Christopher R. Gabel, Ph.D.

"The battalion's catchphrase for this operation was "Knock 'em all down."  There was no attempt to avoid collateral damage; in fact, the troops displayed ...
2/
globalsecurity.org/military/libra…
Image
...a degree of enthusiasm in wrecking a German city."

Warfare with the Japanese in buildings or caves was a form of civil engineering with direct and indirect fire high explosive.  

You don't remove the enemy from the terrain.

3/ Image
Read 6 tweets
Oct 29
Gosh,

The level of threat ignorance and institutional delusion here is just awe inspiring.

BLUF:
When it comes to procuring electronic attack (EA) jamming systems. US Army leadership has the same level of competence as a young man who can't get laid in a wh*rehouse with a...
1/ Image
...pocket full of $100 bills and condoms.

Col. Jeffrey Church laid those facts out in the following article:

Army Wrestles With SIGINT vs. EW
By SYDNEY J. FREEDBERG JR.
on July 31, 2018 at 6:33 PM

2/ breakingdefense.com/2018/07/army-w…
Image
The US Army's dysfunctional E.A. procurement structure that Col. Church described in 2018 still exists.

In Oct 2023 at the Association of the US Army's (AUSA's) annual symposium, US Army General Randy George told reporters of the US Army's continued EA procurement dysfunction
3/ Image
Read 15 tweets
Oct 28
There are reasons that I'm concerned about Chinese PLA/CCP satellite coverage of US Navy Carrier groups after the US Defense Department ordered a THAAD battery to the Middle East.

1/
Very good reasons having to do with the possibility of Chinese anti-ship ballistic missile (ASBM) tech being on Iranian/Houthi medium range ballistic missiles.

2/

When you look at the outline of a Chinese solid fuel ASBM (left).

And then a Toufan (Iranian Ghadr) medium-range ballistic missile. (right).

It makes you think about Chinese technology transfers to Iran and go🤨🤔😱

3/3 End
Image
Image
Read 4 tweets
Oct 28
Interesting claims about the BMPT, a light turret w/o the '125mm autoloader of death' means a BMPT is a lot tougher to kill.

It's still Russian arms show marketing.

A US Javelin in top attack mode or a AFU Stugna will have this vehicle design (diagram⬇️) for a light snack
1/5
Image
The battlefield vulnerability of the BMPT is easily proven.

There are visuals of a BMPT being engaged by Ukrainian 152mm/155mm artillery shells showing it to be as vulnerable as any other ex-Soviet tank design to modern weapons.

2/5
There are visuals of a T-72 becoming a Stugna light snack.

3/5

Read 6 tweets
Oct 28
Well, this:

"Iranian-backed Houthis in Yemen. They have the new Toufan (Iranian Ghadr) medium-range ballistic missile"

Explains the movement of the US Army THAAD battery to the Mid-East.

1/
Image
I am really hoping I'm wrong about this prediction of mine regarding THAAD being there to protect US Carriers from Chinese tech anti-ship guided warheads on the Toufan (Iranian Ghadr).

Because if there are Chinese tech ASBM warheads...

2/

Image
...will there be Chinese satellite surveillance spotting for an Houthi ASBM warhead equipped Toufan/Ghadr?🤨🤔😱

3/3 End

Image
Image
Image
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(