Other than the BA.2.86/JN lineages, the hottest trend right now is for lineages to pick up the FliP mutations L455F/F456L in addition to A475V. It's pretty clear that this combination is more antibody resistant.
2/
The main lineages with this combination right now are JD.1.1, GK.3.1, FL.15.1.1 and GW.5.1.1.
3/
You would think the most prominent lineages would be derived from one of the very prominent lineages that was only one mutation away such as JG.1, HK.3, or JF.1. But that is not the case. 4/
Almost all of these lineages with the trio are derived from lineages that branched off earlier in the tree and recreated the whole trio of mutations from scratch.
5/
The most prevalent of these trio lineages is JD.1.1, which is derived from a little known lineage (XBB.1.5.102) that circulated mostly in Brazil. In the early summer it independently picked up 455F, 456L, and finally 475V.
6/
JD.1.1 mostly stayed put in Brazil until about July, when it moved into North America and Europe, and it has been expanding at a steady rate since then. 7/
Although JD.1.1 is the most prevalent of the trio lineages, the one I’m keeping my eye on is GW.5.1.1.
This lineage independently acquired 486P, 455F, 456L, (478I), and 475V.
8/
In addition, @LongDesertTrain recently noted that GW.5.1.1 has completely deleted Orf 7 and 8. (Something even the sequencers had not noted). It isn't the first lineage to do this, so I'm curious to see what it will do for the virus.
Not sure if anyone has noted this already, but the A475V + FliP mutations are showing up almost exclusively (>99%) in lineages lacking S:478R. I’m guessing 475V and 479R are incompatible. We’ll see if that is true.
10/
As always, let me know if I got any of my facts wrong.
11/11
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
SRR25926360 is the SRA number for a sample from DC collected on 8/27/23 from a sewershed with 1.6M people. You can look up the details about it on SRA. 3/ ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra/
Oh shit.
I mentioned before that I was worried that BA.2.86 would pick up S:456L because that is the one place where BA.2.86 is more sensitive to neutralizing antibodies than EG.5 and the like. 1/
This is @yunlong_cao data, but others have found the same. The mutation that gives EG.5 and HK.3 this resistance is S:F456L. 2/
I was expecting F456L because that is the change that usually appears first. It has shown up convergently at least 5 times in XBB backgrounds. F456L is often followed by the L455F (so called FLip), which presumably allows it to further escape class-1 antibodies.
3/
We submitted a very short manuscript this week on the SARS-CoV-2 cryptic lineage detected for the second longest period of time (16 months). 1/ medrxiv.org/content/10.110…
I wasn't sure when was the right time to write this up because I was never sure when it was really gone. At one point it disappeared for 7 months before reappearing.
The last time we was it was almost a year ago, so I think it is gone this time.
2/
This figure basically summarizes the manuscript.
The lineage first appeared 5 months before Omicron did with 5 RBD changes (4/5 at 'Omicron positions').
The last time we saw it had 12 RBD changes and it looked like an Omicron doppelganger.
Most studies that have been coming out have been finding that BA.2.86* is not all that immune evasive. So far it has not taken off like an Omicron, and I haven't heard of too many major outbreaks (yet).
However...
1/
BA.2.86 has remained the fastest growing lineage in the world since it emerged, with sequence numbers doubling about every week.
If the advantage is not coming from immune evasion, it must have something else going for it.
In addition, the main antibody sensitivity that BA.2.86 still seems to have is from class I neutralizing antibodies (E483DEL didn't evade these as much as I had anticipated). That is why EG.5 and the like seems to be doing better at immune evasion than BA.2.86.
3/
Our list of cryptic lineages has grown to 49. Here is an update on the RBD changes that are most common in these lineages. 1/
I first want to point out K417T, which is the most common change. It’s always 417T and not 417N (which is by far the most common in circulating lineages). The circulating lineages with 417T have all fizzled.
Why cryptics always have K417T specifically remains a mystery to me. 2/
The region from 444-446 is highly altered, but there is no one specific change favored. Class 3 neutralizing antibodies bind here, so change is selected for. However, the region does not seem to be critical in receptor binding, so ‘anything goes’. 3/
Here are some slides for a BA.2.86 introduction I'm giving.
The lineage has appeared in 4 countries in the last week and none of the 6 cases appear to be related.
1/6
The BA.2.86 Spike has been under very strong selective pressure. 2/6
Like in several cryptics, BA.2.86 has an insertion/duplication. 3/6