Sadly, the DoD is filled with these kind of guys whose worldview of drones is as a ROBOCOP class procurement/budget threat to their crewed "ED-209's" (F-35/LCS/M1299).
2/
Three years ago almost everybody was shocked when the Azeris conducted a complete CAS/BAI campaign in N-K using little plastic Bayraktars & miniature MAM-C/L LGBs.
Now no one is shocked that half of all RuAF guns, mortar & rocket systems killed in Oct 2023 died of drones 3/
Between April & June 2023 I tracked the systematic destruction of front line RuAF artillery systems to the tune of 700(+) systems.
The addition of masses of AFU grenade dropping and FPV drones with remote radio relay from other drones did 1/2 of that 700 number in Oct 2023.
4/
We have just seen in October 2023 a combat drone equivalent of the Battle of Cambrai in 1917. Where tanks began to take a dominant position in fighting ground wars.
But rather than being an expensive addition to the cost of war. Drones are a cheap disruptive innovation 5/
...that is providing 1st tier military airpower, ATGMs & artillery fire support to non-nation state actors to kill tanks, jets, and large artillery guns. They are the chariots of the late bronze age collapse empires facing the cheap iron weapons (drones) of the Sea 6/
...peoples. And 3D printing is the iron weapon making production analog for 2023.
For those that doubt that thought:
Here is a drone killed Merkava. A drone would do the same to an M1A2 SepV3 Abrams or an M-10 Booker.
The combat drone technology on display since 2017, when ISIS was plinking Iraqi M1A1 Abrams tanks, represents the kind of technological challenge to the Western way of war that digital camera technology did when Kodak 8/
...faced the shift to digital cameras.
Everything Kodak knew and experienced with cameras and photographic film left it's leadership as maladapted to new technology as those old late Bronze age chariot empires were to iron weapon wielding and bareback horse riding nomads.
9/
We can track this Kodak versus digital camera closing of Senior US Flag rank military minds to the Millennium Challenge 2002 (MC02) exercise where USMC General Van Riper destroyed the Blue Force carrier, USMC amphibious unit & 82nd Airborne Div. intervention force.
10/
...with cruise missiles, suicide boats and persistent chemical weapons.
Blue force lost 16 ships including a CV and 5 of 6 marine transports, and 20,000 men, in an afternoon.
"White Cell" restarting the exercise to give the 82nd Division it's training objectives is legitimate.
What was not was ordering Red air defenses not only not to shoot, but turn on its radars and come out into the open to be killed was utterly corrupt & unprofessional.
13/
This was 4-years after Operation Allied Force where Serbian air defenses did exactly what Gen Van Ripper's Red Team did from 24 March 1999 to 10 June 1999.
And the Serbs killed an F-117, while preserving their integrated air defenses to war's end.
Gen Van Ripper was literally told during the exercise by JFCOM Commander Gen. Buck Kernan no one would pay attention to what the Serbs did:
"You are playing out of character. The OPFOR would never have done what you did.”🤯🤦♂️
The fact that "White Cell" also forbid Red Team
15/
...from using the chemical weapons they possessed, the objective over which the Blue Force started the war over, was just the unprofessional military cheating cherry on top.
Van Riper had good _professional_ reasons for resigning as the head of the Red Team during the...
16/
...remainder of the exercise.
Gen Van Riper succinctly summed up what happened MC02:
“War-gaming is not normally corrupted, but this whole thing was prostituted; it was a sham intended to prove what they wanted to prove.”
17/
It was also highly professional that Van Riper leaked the scale of the scale of the cheating in MC02.
Military careers are made for sacrifice.
Sacrificing your own for the ethical good of the military service is an act of profound moral courage.👏👏👏
18/
The one thing I've seen from watching the US military respond to the drone threat since 2017 is that they learned nothing from MC02.
Not one US Flag rank has publicly criticized the Pentagon policy of not buying Chinese off the shelf drones for units to train with at home.
19/
And the "small explosive boat" threat in the Persian Gulf is orders of magnitude worse since suicide tactics are no longer required with drones.
It is utterly foolish to put USN carriers inside the Persian Gulf without flotillas of its own boat-drones to counter this threat 20/
Sadly, I don't expect the US military to adapt their services to fielded Iranian/Chinese/RuAF drone threats unless and until they have taken heavy combat losses from them.
I hope I'm wrong.
I strongly fear...I won't be.
21/21 End
@threadreaderapp unroll please
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
There are usual 9-to-10 battalions of tanks, infantry, & reconnaissance in a division.
In addition, there are usually 3-to-4 battalions of artillery with 18-to-24 guns each in 3-to-4 batteries of 4-to-8 guns.
Gun batteries will need a minimum of 2 jammers each while using
2/
..."shot & scoot" tactics to avoid counter battery fire.
Plus all artillery fire direction centers will need at least 2-to-3 active jammers so a mass MLRS *blarf* doesn't simply eliminate the grid square they are in.
Then how many are going to be needed with logistics?
"Knock 'em All Down:" The Reduction of Aachen, October 1944
Christopher R. Gabel, Ph.D.
"The battalion's catchphrase for this operation was "Knock 'em all down." There was no attempt to avoid collateral damage; in fact, the troops displayed ... 2/ globalsecurity.org/military/libra…
...a degree of enthusiasm in wrecking a German city."
Warfare with the Japanese in buildings or caves was a form of civil engineering with direct and indirect fire high explosive.
The level of threat ignorance and institutional delusion here is just awe inspiring.
BLUF:
When it comes to procuring electronic attack (EA) jamming systems. US Army leadership has the same level of competence as a young man who can't get laid in a wh*rehouse with a... 1/
...pocket full of $100 bills and condoms.
Col. Jeffrey Church laid those facts out in the following article:
Army Wrestles With SIGINT vs. EW
By SYDNEY J. FREEDBERG JR.
on July 31, 2018 at 6:33 PM
The US Army's dysfunctional E.A. procurement structure that Col. Church described in 2018 still exists.
In Oct 2023 at the Association of the US Army's (AUSA's) annual symposium, US Army General Randy George told reporters of the US Army's continued EA procurement dysfunction 3/
There are reasons that I'm concerned about Chinese PLA/CCP satellite coverage of US Navy Carrier groups after the US Defense Department ordered a THAAD battery to the Middle East.
Very good reasons having to do with the possibility of Chinese anti-ship ballistic missile (ASBM) tech being on Iranian/Houthi medium range ballistic missiles.
The battlefield vulnerability of the BMPT is easily proven.
There are visuals of a BMPT being engaged by Ukrainian 152mm/155mm artillery shells showing it to be as vulnerable as any other ex-Soviet tank design to modern weapons.